Abstract
All economic development has one aspect of quantitative increase and another of qualitative improvement. Qualitative change is much more difficult to model than increased productivity. The mathematical methods through which economics asserted its supremacy among the social sciences are not in favour of formulating qualitative change, as it involves increasing diversity rather than increasing numbers of well-defined objects. Some of the most promising ideas about the nature of development, Smith’s division of labour, and Böhm-Bawerk’s lengthening of roundabout production, were never translated into convincing mathematical models. Even when the initial interests of the researchers may have been to find out something about qualitative improvements, they often end up modelling quantitative increase instead.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Puu, T. (1997). On Progress and Perfection in the Arts and Sciences. In: Andersson, Å.E., Beckmann, M.J., Löfgren, KG., Stenberg, M.A.A. (eds) Economics of Space and Time. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60877-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60877-3_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64596-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60877-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive