Advertisement

The Future Scope for Self-Reliance and Private Insurance

  • Alan Peacock
Conference paper

Abstract

Many years have past since a number of young liberal economists, including myself, raised the question—not then on anyone’s political agenda—as to whether the welfare state was a passing phenomenon (see Watson [ed.], 1957). It seemed only possible then to give rather tentative replies, and my own was contained in a pamphlet (Peacock, 1961), which achieved a certain temporary notoriety:

There is not much point in talking of individual freedom and responsibility to those who live in fear of want. But if poverty is abolished, if income and wealth can be equitably distributed, if economic fluctuations can be mitigated, then individuals are in a situation where, potentially at least, they can plan their own and their children’s future, and where it is less necessary for them to rely upon the State.… The true object of the Welfare State, for the Liberal, is to teach people how to do without it.

Keywords

Social Security Welfare State Private Insurance Economic Affair Private Provision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Akerlof, G.A. 1970. “The Market for ’Lemons’: Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(August): 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barr, N. 1993. The Economics of the Welfare State. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
  3. Barry, N. 1986. “Pensions and Policy-Making in Great Britain.” In: N. Barry and A.T. Peacock, The Political Economy of Pension Provision, Hume Occasional Paper No.2, pp. 11–18. Edinburgh: David Hume Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Beenstock, M., and V. Brasse. 1986. Insurance for Unemployment. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  5. Hayek, F. A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Institute of Economic Affairs. 1994. “Welfare: The Lost Century.” Economic Affairs 14(5): 5–45.Google Scholar
  7. Jasay, A. de. 1991. Choice, Contract, Consent: A Restatement of Liberalism. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  8. Mill, J.S. [1859] 1912. On Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Overbye, E. 1995. “Explaining Welfare Spending.” Public Choice 83(3–4): 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Peacock, A.T (ed.). 1984. The Regulation Game. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Peacock, A.T. 1961. The Welfare Society. Unservile State Paper No. 2. London: Liberal Party.Google Scholar
  12. Peacock, A.T. 1991. “Welfare Philosophies and Welfare Finance.” In: T. Wilson and D. Wilson (eds.), The State and Social Welfare. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Peacock, A.T. 1992. “The Credibility of Advice to Government.” The Economic Journal 102 (September): 1213–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peacock, A.T., and J. Wiseman. 1961. The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom: 1890–1955. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rizzo, I. 1990. The Hidden Debt. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  16. Soderstrom, L. 1989. “Almost Genuine Insurance Schemes as an Alternative to Tax-Financed Pensions and other Social Security Benefits.” In: A. Chiancone and K. Messere (eds.), Changes in Revenue Structure. Detroit: Wayne State University.Google Scholar
  17. Watson, G. (ed.). 1957. The Unservile State. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  18. Weizsäcker, R. von. 1990. “Population Aging and Social Security: A Politico-Economic Model of State Pension Financing.” Public Finance (3): 491–509.Google Scholar
  19. Wilson, T. 1985. “The Unwithered Welfare State.” In: D. Greenaway and G.K.Shaw (eds.), Public Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Yarrow, G. 1993. Social Security and Friendly Societies: Options for the Future. Report Commissioned and Published by the National Conference of Friendly Societies. London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Peacock

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations