Advertisement

Comment on Hans-Georg Petersen “Pros and Cons of a Negative Income Tax”

  • Lars Söderström

Abstract

There are many more pros than cons in this paper. Professor Petersen is quite enthusiastic about the negative income tax (NIT) as a substitute for current welfare state transfers in accordance with what he calls the social aid principle (Fürsorgeprinzip). I do not share his enthusiasm. In my view, NIT is both expensive and inefficient.

Keywords

Disability Pension Unemployment Benefit Housing Allowance Cash Benefit Factor Income 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Jerger, J., and A. Spermann. 1995. “Alternatives to Subsidize Low-Wage Employment: The Case for a Targeted Negative-Income Tax Solution in Germany.” International Institute of Public Finance 51st Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, August 21–24 (mimeo).Google Scholar
  2. Statistics Sweden. 1992. Socialutgifterna och utgifternas finansiering år 1990. S42 SM 9201. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.Google Scholar
  3. Swedish Government. 1990. Reviderad Finansplan 1990/1991. Stockholm: Swedish Government.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars Söderström

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations