Skip to main content

Admissibility and Stability

  • Chapter
Understanding Strategic Interaction
  • 243 Accesses

Abstract

Admissibility is a useful criterion for selecting among equilibria, but I argue that enforcing admissibility dilutes the power of stability criteria to select among equilibrium components, and this accounts for anomalous examples of stable sets. Therefore, admissibility should be invoked only when selecting equilibria within a component that is immune to payoff perturbations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bagwell, Kyle (1995), ‘Commitment and Observability in Games,’ Games and Economic Behavior, 8: 271–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banks, Jeffrey, and Joel Sobel (1987), ‘Equilibrium Selection in Signaling Games,’ Econometrica,55: 647–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blume, Lawrence, and William Zame (1994), ‘The Algebraic Geometry of Perfect and Sequential Equilibrium,’ Econometrica, 62: 783–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cho, In-Koo, and David Kreps (1987), ‘Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102: 179–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fudenberg, Drew, David Kreps, and David Le vine (1988), ‘On the Robustness of Equilibrium Refinements,’ Journal of Economic Theory, 44: 354–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fudenberg, Drew, and Eric Maskin (1986), ‘The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting and with Incomplete Information,’ Econometrica, 54: 533–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kohlberg, Elon, and Jean-François Mertens (1986), ‘On the Strategic Stability of Equilibria,’ Econometrica, 54: 1003–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kreps, David (1990), A Course in Economic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kreps, David, and Robert Wilson (1982), ‘Sequential Equilibria,’ Econometrica,50: 863–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mertens, Jean-François (1989), ‘Stable Equilibria — A Reformulation,’ Mathematics of Operations Research, 14: 575–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mertens, Jean-François (1995), ‘Two Examples of Strategic Equilibrium,’ Games and Economic Behavior, 8: 378–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Myerson, Roger (1978), ‘Refinement of the Nash Equilibrium Concept,’ International Journal of Game Theory, 7: 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Myerson, Roger (1986), ‘Multistage Games with Communication,’ Econometrica,54: 323–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pearce, David (1984), ‘Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection,’ Econometrica, 52: 1029–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Selten, Reinhard (1965), ‘Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfragetragheit,’ Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 121: 301–24.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Selten, Reinhard (1975), ‘Re-examination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games,’ International Journal of Game Theory. 4: 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Selten, Reinhard (1978), ‘The Chain-Store Paradox,’ Theory and Decision, 9: 127–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van Damme, Eric (1984), ‘A Relation between Perfect Equilibria in Extensive-Form Games and Proper Equilibria in Normal-Form Games,’ International Journal of Game Theory, 13: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. van Damme, Eric (1987), Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  20. van Damme, Eric (1989), ‘Stable Equilibria and Forward Induction,’ Journal of Economic Theory, 48: 476–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. van Damme, Eric (1991), ‘Refinements of Nash Equilibrium,’ in J.J. LafFont (1992), Advances in Economic Theory: Sixth World Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin — Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, R. (1997). Admissibility and Stability. In: Albers, W., Güth, W., Hammerstein, P., Moldovanu, B., van Damme, E. (eds) Understanding Strategic Interaction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64430-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60495-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics