Abstract
The Paradox of the Absent-Minded Driver is used in the literature to draw attention to the inadequacy of Savage’s theory of subjective probability when its underlying epistomological assumptions fail to be satisfied. This note suggests that the paradox is less telling when the uncertainties involved admit an objective interpretation as frequencies.
Ce que j’ai appris, je ne le sais plus. Le peu que je sais encore, je l’ai deviné. Chamfort, Maximes et Pensées, 1975
Support from the Economic and Social Research Council under their “Beliefs and Behaviour” Programme L 122 251 024 is gratefully acknowledged.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
S. Alpern. Games with repeated decisions. SIAM Journal of Control and Optimization, pages 468–477, 1988.
K. Binmore. Modeling rational players, I and II. Economics and Philosophy, 3:179–214, 1987.
K. Binmore. Modeling rational players, I and II. Economics and Philosophy, 4:9–55, 1987.
K. Binmore. Fun and Games. D. C. Heath, Lexington, Mass., 1991.
K. Binmore. Debayesing game theory. In B. Skyrms, editor, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Game Theory: Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and the Philosophy of Science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992.
K. Binmore. Playing Fair: Game Theory and the Social Contract I. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1994.
I. Gilboa. Technical report.
J. Isbell. Finitary games. In Contributions to the Theory of Games III. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1957.
J. M. Keynes. A Treatise on Probability. Macmillan, London, 1921.
H. Kuhn. Extensive games and the problem of information. In H. Kuhn and A. Tucker, editors, Contributions to the Theory of Games II. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1953.
E. McClennen. Rationality and Dynamic Choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.
R. Nozick. Newcomb’s problem and two principles of choice. In N. Rescher, editor, Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Reidel, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1969.
M. Piccione and A. Rubinstein. On the interpretation of decision problems with imperfect recall. Working Paper 9–94, Sackler Institute, Tel Aviv University, 1994.
A. Rubinstein. Finite automata play the repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 39:83–96, 1986.
L. Savage. The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York, 1951.
R. Selten. Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive-games. International Journal of Game Theory, 4:25–55, 1975.
R. Strotz. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economic Studies, 23:166–180, 1973.
J. Von Neumann and O. Morgenstern. The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1944.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin — Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Binmore, K. (1997). A Note On Imperfect Recall. In: Albers, W., Güth, W., Hammerstein, P., Moldovanu, B., van Damme, E. (eds) Understanding Strategic Interaction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64430-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60495-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive