Skip to main content

Abstract

The Paradox of the Absent-Minded Driver is used in the literature to draw attention to the inadequacy of Savage’s theory of subjective probability when its underlying epistomological assumptions fail to be satisfied. This note suggests that the paradox is less telling when the uncertainties involved admit an objective interpretation as frequencies.

Ce que j’ai appris, je ne le sais plus. Le peu que je sais encore, je l’ai deviné. Chamfort, Maximes et Pensées, 1975

Support from the Economic and Social Research Council under their “Beliefs and Behaviour” Programme L 122 251 024 is gratefully acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Alpern. Games with repeated decisions. SIAM Journal of Control and Optimization, pages 468–477, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Binmore. Modeling rational players, I and II. Economics and Philosophy, 3:179–214, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Binmore. Modeling rational players, I and II. Economics and Philosophy, 4:9–55, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Binmore. Fun and Games. D. C. Heath, Lexington, Mass., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Binmore. Debayesing game theory. In B. Skyrms, editor, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Game Theory: Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and the Philosophy of Science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Binmore. Playing Fair: Game Theory and the Social Contract I. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Gilboa. Technical report.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Isbell. Finitary games. In Contributions to the Theory of Games III. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. M. Keynes. A Treatise on Probability. Macmillan, London, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Kuhn. Extensive games and the problem of information. In H. Kuhn and A. Tucker, editors, Contributions to the Theory of Games II. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. McClennen. Rationality and Dynamic Choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Nozick. Newcomb’s problem and two principles of choice. In N. Rescher, editor, Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Reidel, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Piccione and A. Rubinstein. On the interpretation of decision problems with imperfect recall. Working Paper 9–94, Sackler Institute, Tel Aviv University, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Rubinstein. Finite automata play the repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 39:83–96, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Savage. The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Selten. Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive-games. International Journal of Game Theory, 4:25–55, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Strotz. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economic Studies, 23:166–180, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Von Neumann and O. Morgenstern. The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin — Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Binmore, K. (1997). A Note On Imperfect Recall. In: Albers, W., Güth, W., Hammerstein, P., Moldovanu, B., van Damme, E. (eds) Understanding Strategic Interaction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64430-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60495-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics