Skip to main content

Cooperation in Intergroup and Single-Group Prisoner’s Dilemma Games

  • Chapter
Understanding Strategic Interaction

Abstract

We review two experiments in which the Intergroup Prisoner’s Dilemma (IPD) team-game was compared with a single-group Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD). The first experiment (Bornstein & Ben-Yossef, 1994) compared the games when played once. We found that although the IPD and PD games are strategically equivalent, subjects were more likely to cooperate in the intergroup than in the single-group game. The second experiment (Bornstein, Winter, & Goren, in press) compared the IPD and PD games played repeatedly. We found again that subjects were initially more likely to cooperate in the IPD game than in the PD game. However, cooperation rates decreased as the game progressed and, as a result, the differences between the two games disappeared. This pattern suggests that subjects learn the structure of the game and adapt their behavior accordingly. Computer simulations based on the learning model of Roth & Erev (1995) support this interpretation.

We would like to thank the Israeli Academy of Science for supporting this research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aumann, R., & Brandengurger, A. (1994). Epistemic conditions for Nash Equilibrium. Discussion paper No. 57. The Center for Rationality and Interactive Decision Theory, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenheim, D., Peleg, B., & Whinston, M. D. (1987). Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibria Concepts. Journal of Economic Theory, 42, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, G. (1992). The free rider problem in intergroup conflicts over step-level and continuous public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, G., & Ben-Yossef, M. (1994). Cooperation in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, G., Winter, E., & Goren, H. (in press). Experimental study of repeated team games. European Journal of Political Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. I. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago\London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1965). Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1972). On the genetics of altruism and the counter-hedonic components in human culture. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1956). The function of social conflict. Glenco Ill: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colman, A. (1982). Game theory and experimental games: The study of strategic interaction. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, C. B. (1982). Learning the evolutionarily stable strategy. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 89, 611–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, A. (1995). Cooperation in the repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma when the number of stages is not commonly known. Discussion paper No. 65. The Center for Rationality and Interactive Desicion Theory, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, T. R., & Rosenthal, H. (1983). A strategic calculus of voting. Public Choice, 41, 7–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, An., & Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoner’s dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., & Erev, I. (1995). Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior, 8, 164–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1991). Evolution, learning, and economic behavior. Games and Economic Behavior, 3, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J. (1984). Game theory and evolution of behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 95–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A. A. (1976). Conflict and Cohesion: A review of the litrature. Journal of Conflict Resulotion, 20, 143–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Monographs, 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin — Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bornstein, G., Winter, E., Goren, H. (1997). Cooperation in Intergroup and Single-Group Prisoner’s Dilemma Games. In: Albers, W., Güth, W., Hammerstein, P., Moldovanu, B., van Damme, E. (eds) Understanding Strategic Interaction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64430-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60495-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics