Skip to main content

Theory, Field, and Laboratory: The Continuing Dialogue

  • Chapter
Understanding Strategic Interaction

Abstract

Reinhard Selten has proposed a four-step schema for policy analysis, consisting of (1) focus on a section of reality, (2) formal modelling of that reality, (3) comparison of outcomes under different institutional arrangements, and (4) pursuit of empirical research based on those comparisons. In this paper, we apply Selten’s schema to common-pool resources and the problems that they face. We show how the last decade of research has conformed to Selten’s pattern. In particular, we stress the role field studies and controlled laboratory experiments have played in building behavioral theories for these resources - a role we expect to see expand in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bester, Helmut, and Werner Güth. 1994. “Is Altruism Evolutionary Stable?” Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Sue E.S., and Elinor Ostrom. 1995. “A Grammar of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 89(3) (Sept.): 582–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, Robyn M. 1973. “The Commons Dilemma Game: An N-person Mixed-Motive Game with a Dominating Strategy for Defection.” Oregon Research Institute Research Bulletin 13:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Roy. 1995. Games for Business and Economics. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Roy, and Elinor Ostrom. 1991. “Rules and Games.” Public Choice 70(2) (May): 121–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Roy, Elinor Ostrom, and James Walker. 1990. “The Nature of Common-Pool Resource Problems.” Rationality and Society 2(3) (July): 335–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Clark, Margaret McKean, and Elinor Ostrom, eds. Forthcoming. Forest Resources and Institutions. Forests, Trees and People Programme, Phase II, Working Paper no. 3. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güth, Werner, and Hartmut Kliemt. 1994. “Competition or Co-operation. On the Evolutionary Economics of Trust, Exploitation and Moral Attitudes.” Metroeconomica 45(1394): 155–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, Garrett. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162:1243–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, John, and Reinhard Selten. 1988. A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, Wai Fung. 1994. “Institutions, Engineering Infrastructure, and Performance in the Governance and Management of Irrigation Systems: The Case of Nepal.” Ph.D. diss., Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1986. Proceedings of the Conference on Common Property Resource Management. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor. 1994. “Constituting Social Capital and Collective Action.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6(4) (Oct.): 527–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor, Roy Gardner, and James Walker. 1994. Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor and James Walker. Forthcoming. “Neither Markets Nor States: Linking Transformation Processes in Collective Action Arenas.” In Perspectives on Public Choice, ed. Dennis Mueller. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor, James Walker, and Roy Gardner. 1992. “Covenants With and Without a Sword: Self-Governance Is Possible.” American Political Science Review 86(2) (June): 404–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocco, Elena, and Massimo Warglien. 1995. “Computer Mediated Communication and the Emergence of ‘Electronic Opportunism’.” Venice, Italy: University of Venice, Department of Economics, Laboratory of Experimental Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager, Edella. 1990. “Model Specification and Policy Analysis: The Governance of Coastal Fisheries.” Ph.D. diss., Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, Reinhard. 1975. “Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games.” International Journal of Game Theory 4:25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, Reinhard. 1978. “The Chain Store Paradox.” Theory and Decision 9:127–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, Reinhard. 1986. “Institutional Utilitarianism.” In Guidance, Control, and Evaluation in the Public Sector, ed. Franz-Xaver Kaufmann, Giandomenico Majone, and Vincent Ostrom, 251–64. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, Reinhard. 1991. “Evolution, Learning, and Economic Behavior.” Games and Economic Behavior 3:3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, Reinhard, Michael Mitzkewitz, and Gerald Uhlich. 1988. “Duopoly Strategies Programmed by Experienced Players.” Discussion Paper no. B-106. Bonn, Germany: University of Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, Glenn G. 1991. Common Property Economics: A General Theory and Land Use Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Shui Yan. 1992. Institutions and Collective Action: Self-Governance in Irrigation. San Francisco, Calif.: ICS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, James, Roy Gardner, Elinor Ostrom, and Andrew Herr. 1995. “Voting on Allocation Rules in a Commons without Face-to-Face Communication: Theoretical Issues and Experimental Results.” Paper to be presented at the conference on “Game Theory and the Behavioral Sciences,” Tucson, Arizona, October 10–12, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissing, Franz J., and Elinor Ostrom. 1991. “Irrigation Institutions and the Games Irrigators Play: Rule Enforcement without Guards.” In Game Equilibrium Models II: Methods, Morals, and Markets, ed. Reinhard Selten, 188–262. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissing, Franz J., and Elinor Ostrom. 1993. “Irrigation Institutions and the Games Irrigators Play: Rule Enforcement on Government- and Farmer-Managed Systems.” In Games in Hierarchies and Networks: Analytical and Empirical Approaches to the Study of Governance Institutions, ed. Fritz W. Scharpf, 387–428. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag; Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin — Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J. (1997). Theory, Field, and Laboratory: The Continuing Dialogue. In: Albers, W., Güth, W., Hammerstein, P., Moldovanu, B., van Damme, E. (eds) Understanding Strategic Interaction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64430-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60495-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics