Skip to main content

Strict and Symmetric Correlated Equilibria are the Distributions of the ESS’s of Biological Conflicts with Asymmetric Roles

  • Chapter
Understanding Strategic Interaction

Abstract

We investigate the ESS’s of payoff-irrelevant asymmetric animal conflicts in Selten’s (1980) model. We show that these are determined by the symmetric and strict correlated equilibria of the underlying (symmetric) two-person game. More precisely, the set of distributions (on the strategy space) of ESS’s coincides with the set of strict and symmetric correlated equilibria (described as distributions). Our result enables us to predict all possible stable payoffs in payoff-irrelevant asymmetric animal conflicts using Aumann’s correlated equilibria. It also enables us to interpret correlated euqilibria as solutions to biological conflicts: Nature supplies the correlation device as a phenotypic conditional behavior.

This work was supported by Volkswagen Foundation Grant I/63691 to ECO-RATIO group. We would like to thank the Institute of Advanced Studies of The Hebrew University of Jerusalem for its hospitality which contributed to our “coordination”. We acknowledge helpful conversations with R. Aumann, S. Ellner, U. Motro, R. Selten, J. Sobel, and P. Young. We thank S. Zamir and D. Goldberg for comments on the manuscript. A.S. would like to thank especially R. Selten, A. Neyman and M. Maschler for introducing him to the intriguing world of game theory and competitive interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aumann, R.J. (1974). “Subjectivity and Correlation in Randomized Strategies,” J. Math. Eco. 1, 67–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R.J. (1987). “Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality,” Econometrica 55, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cripps, M. (1991). “Correlated Equilibria and Evolutionary Stability”, Journal of Economic Theory 55, 428–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N.B. (1978). “Territorial Defense in the Speckled Wood Butterfly Pararge aegeria: the Resident Always Wins,” Anim. Behav. 26, 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forges, F. (1986). “An Approach to Communication Equilibria,” 54, 1375–1385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forges, F. (1990). “Sunspot Equilibirum as a Game-Theoretical Solution Concept,” Core Discussion Paper No. 9029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein, P. (1981). “The Role of Asymmetries in Animal Conflicts,” Animal Behavior 29, 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein, P., and Selten, R. (1991). “Evolutionary Game Theory,” in Handbook of Game Theory (R. Aumann and S. Hart, Eds.). Amsterdam: North Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, A.R., and Dill, L.M. (1980). “Zebrea Spiders May Use Uncorrelated Asymmetries to Settle Contests,” Am. Nat. 116, 199–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith, J., and Parker, G.A. (1976). “The Logic of Asymmetric Contests,” Anim. Behav. 24, 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michod, R.E., and Levin, B.R. (eds.) (1988). The Evolution of Sex. Sunderland, Mass: Sinuar Ass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R.B. (1991). Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G.A. (1978). “Selfish Genes, Evolutionary Games, and the Adaptiveness of Behavior,” Nature (Lond.) 274, 849–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G.A. (1982). “Phenotype-limited Evolutionary Stable Strategies,” in Current Problems in Sociobiology (King’s College Sociobiology Group, Eds.), pp. 173–201. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G.A. (1984). “Evolutionary Stable Strategies,” in Behavioral Ecology (J.R. Krebs and W.B. Davies, Eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G.A., and Hammerstein, P. (1985). “Game Theory and Animal Behavior,” in Evolution, essay in honor of John Maynard-Smith (P.J. Greenwood, P.H. Harvey, and M. Slatkin, Eds.), pp. 73–94. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert, S.E., and Hammerstein, P. (1983). “Game Theory in the Ecological Context,” Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sys 14, 377–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shmida, A. and Peleg, B. (1991). “Strict and symmetric correlated equilibria are the distributions of the ESS’s of biological conflicts with assymmetric roles”. Disc, paper No. 11. Center for Rationality. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1980). “A Note on Evolutionarily Stable Strategies in Asymmetric Animal Conflicts,” J. of Theor. Biol. 84, 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1991). “Evolution, Learning and Economic Behavior,” Games and Eco. Beh. 3, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme, E.E.C. (1987). Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin — Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shmida, A., Peleg, B. (1997). Strict and Symmetric Correlated Equilibria are the Distributions of the ESS’s of Biological Conflicts with Asymmetric Roles. In: Albers, W., Güth, W., Hammerstein, P., Moldovanu, B., van Damme, E. (eds) Understanding Strategic Interaction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64430-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60495-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics