Skip to main content
  • 65 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die gastroösophageale Refluxkrankheit ist die häufigste gutartige Erkrankung der Speiseröhre und betrifft ungefähr 10–30% der westlichen Bevölkerung [15]. Verantwortlich für diese Erkrankung ist symptomatischer oder asymptomatischer Reflux von Magen-oder Duodenalsaft in die Speiseröhre mit oder ohne Veränderungen an der Speiseröhrenschleimhaut. Salzsäure und Pepsin sind die am besten untersuchten Inhaltsstoffe aus dem Magen, die zur Entwicklung von Symptomen in der Speiseröhre und zu Veränderungen an der Mukosa führen können. Darüber hinaus kann sich Magensaft mit Flüssigkeit aus dem Duodenum durch transpylorischen Reflux von Gallensäuren oder Pankreasenzymen vermischen [14, 40]. Dieser duodenogastrische Reflux tritt auch bei Normalpersonen auf, hier jedoch überwiegend nachts und postprandial [17, 18, 44]. Für die Epithelschäden verantwortlich gemacht werden v.a. Gallensäuren, aber auch Trypsin und Lezithin [21, 28].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Attwood SEA, DeMeester TR, Bremner CG et al. (1989) Alkaline gastroesophageal reflux: Implications in the development of complications in Barrett’s columnar-lined lower esophagus. Surgery 106: 764–770

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Attwood SEA, Ball SC, Barlow AP et al. (1993) Role of intragastric and intraesophageal alkalinization in the genesis of complications in Barrett’s columnar lined lower esophagus. Gut 34: 11–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bechi P, Paucciani F, Baldini F et al. (1993) Long-term ambulatory enterogastric reflux monitoring. Validation of a new fib eroptic technique. Dig Dis Sci 38: 1297–1306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bechi P, Falciai R, Baldini R et al. (1994) A new fib eroptic sensor for ambulatory enterogastric reflux detection. In: Katzir A (ed) Fiber optic medical and fluorescent sensors and applications. Spie, Bellingham, pp 130–135

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bremner RM, Crookes PF, DeMeester TR et al. (1992) Concentration of refluxed acid and esophageal mucosal injury. Am J Surg 164: 522–527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carney CN, Orlando RC, Powell DW (1981) Morphologic alterations in early acid induced epithelial injury of the rabbit esophagus. Lab Invest 45: 198–208

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Champion G, Richter JE, Vaezi MF et al. (1994) Duodeno-gastric reflux; relationship to pH and importance in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 107: 747–754

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cross FS, Wangensteen OH (1961) Role of bile and pancreatic juice in the production of esophageal erosions and anemia. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 77: 862–884

    Google Scholar 

  9. DeMeester TR, Stein HJ (1989) Gastroesophageal reflux disease. In: Moody FG, Carey LC, Jones RS et al. (eds) Surgical treatment of digestive disease, 2nd edn. Year Book, Chicago, pp 65–108

    Google Scholar 

  10. DeMeester TR, Wang CI, Wernly JA et al. (1980) Technique, indications and clinical use of 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 79: 656–667

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Devault KR, Georgeson S, Castell DO (1993) Salivary stimulation mimics esophageal exposure to refluxed duodenal contents. Am J Gastroenterol 88: 1040–1043

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Drane WE, Karvelis K, Johnson DA et al. (1987) Scintigraphic evaluation of duodenogastric reflux. Problems, pitfalls, and technical review. Clin Nucl Med 12: 377–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Duane WC, Wiegand DM (1980) Mechanism by which bile salt disrupts the gastric mucosal barrier in the dog. J Clin Invest 66: 1044–1049

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferguson DJ, Sanchez-Palomera E, Sako Y et al. (1950) Studies on experimental esophagitis. Surgery 28: 1022–1039

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. The Gallop Organization (1988) A Gallop survey on „heartburn across America“. Princeton/NJ, The Gallop Organization

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gillen P, Keeling P, Byrne PJ et al. (1987) Barrett’s oesophagus: pH profile. Br J Surg 74: 774–776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gotley DC, Morgan AP, Cooper MJ (1988) Bile acid concentration in the refluxate of patients with reflux esophagitis. Br J Surg 75: 587–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gotley DC, Morgan AP, Ball D et al. (1991) Composition of gastro-oesophageal refluxate. Gut 32: 1093–1099

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamilton BH, Orlando RC (1989) In vivo alkaline secretion by mammalian esophagus. Gastroenterology 97: 640–648

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Harmon JW, Johnson LF, Maydonovitch CL (1981) Effect of acid and bile salts in the rabbit esophageal mucosa. Dig Dis Sci 26: 65–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Harmon JW, Doong T, Gadacz TR (1987) Bile acids are not equally damaging to the gastric mucosa. Surgery 7: 79–86

    Google Scholar 

  22. Helsingen N Jr (1961) Esophagitis following total gastrectomy: a clinical and experimental study. Acta Chir Scand 273 (Suppl): 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson F, Joelsson B, Floren CH et al. (1988) Bile salts in the esophagus of patients with esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 23: 712–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kauer WKH, Burdiles P, Ireland AP et al. (1995) Does duodenal juice reflux into the esophagus of patients with complicated GERD? Evaluation of a fiberoptic sensor for bilirubin. Am J Surg 169: 98–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kauer WKH, Peters JH, DeMeester TR et al. (1995) Mixed reflux of gastric and duodenal juice is more harmful to the esophagus than gastric juice alone: The need for surgical therapy reemphasized. Ann Surg 222: 525–533

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kivilaakso E, Fromm D, Silen W (1980) Effects of bile salts and related compounds on isolated esophageal mucosa. Surgery 87: 280–285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Krog M, Gustaysson S, Jung B (1982) Studies on oesophagitis–No evidence for pyloric incompetence as a primary etiological factor. A scintigraphic study with 99 Tcm-SolcoHIDA. Acta Chir Scand 148: 439–442

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lillemoe KD, Johnson LF, Harmon JW (1982) Role of the components of the gastroduodenal contents in experimental acid esophagitis. Surgery 92: 276–284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lillemoe KD, Johnson LF, Harmon JW (1985) Taurodexycholate modulates the effects of pepsin and trypsin in experimental esophagitis. Surgery 97: 662–667

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Matikainen M, Taavitsainen M, Kalima TV (1981) Duodenogastric reflux in patients with heartburn and esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 16: 253–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mattioli S, Pilotti V, Felice V et al. (1990) Ambulatory 24 hour pH monitoring of the esophagus, fundus and antrum. Dig Dis Sci 35: 929–938

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Moffat RC, Berkas EM (1965) Bile esophagitis. Arch Surg 91: 963–965

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nasrallah SM, Johnston GS, Gadacz TR et al. (1987) The significance of gastric bile reflux seen in endoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 9: 514–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Orlando RC, Bozymski EM (1973) Hearturn in pernicious anemia-a consequence of bile reflux. N Engl J Med 289: 522–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Orlando RC, Powell DW, Carney CN (1981) Pathophysiology of acute acid injury in rabbit esophageal epithelium. J Clin Invest 68: 286–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Orlando RC, Bryson JC, Powell DW et al. (1984) Mechanism of H+ injury in rabbit esophageal epithelium. Am J Physiol 9: G718 - G724

    Google Scholar 

  37. Palmer ED (1960) Subacute erosive („peptic“) esophagitis associated with achlorhydria. N Engl J Med 262: 927–929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pellegrini CA, DeMeester TR, Wernly JA et al. (1978) Alkaline gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Surg 75: 177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Powell DW, Orlando RC, Carney CN (1981) Acid injury of the esophageal epithelium. In: Harmon JW (ed) Basic mechanism of gastrointestinal mucosal cell injury and protection. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore/MD, p 55

    Google Scholar 

  40. Redo SF, Barnes WA, de la Sierra AO (1959) Perfusion of the canine esophagus with secretions of the upper gastro-intestinal tract. Ann Surg 149: 556–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Salo JA, Kivilaakso E (1982) Role of bile salts and trypsin in the pathogenesis of experimental alkaline esophagitis. Surgery 92: 61–68

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Salo JA, Kivilaakso E (1984) Contributions of trypsin and cholate to the pathogenesis of experimental alkaline reflux esophagitis. Scand J Gastroentero 119: 875–881

    Google Scholar 

  43. Salo JA, Lehto VP, Kivilaakso E (1983) Morphological alterations in experimental esophagitis. Light microscopic and scanning and transmission electron microscopic study. Dig Dis Sci 28: 440–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Schidlbeck NE, Heinrich C, Stellard F et al. (1987) Healthy controls have as much bile reflux as gastric ulcer patients. Gut 28: 1577–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schweitzer EJ, Harmon JW, Bass BL et al. (1984) Bile acid efflux precedes mucosal barrier disruption in the rabbit esophagus. Am J Physiol 247: G480 - G485

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Schweitzer EJ, Bass BL, Batzri S et al. (1986) Bile acid accumulation by rabbit esophageal mucosa. Dig Dis Sci 31: 1105–1113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Schweitzer EJ, Bass BL, Batzri S et al. (1987) Lipid solubilization during bile-salt induced esophageal mucosal barrier disruption in the rabbit. J Lab Clin Med 110: 172–179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Shimono M, Clementi F (1977) Intercellular junction of oral epithelium. J Ultrastruct Res 57: 119–126

    Google Scholar 

  49. Singh S, Bradley LA, Richter JE (1993) Determinants of oesophageal „alkaline“ pH environment in controls and patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 34: 309–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Smith MR, Buckton GK, Bennett JR (1984) Bile acid levels in stomach and oesophagus of patients with acid gastroesophageal reflux (abstract) Gut 25: A556

    Google Scholar 

  51. Stein HJ, Siewert JR (1993) Barrett’s esophagus: pathogenesis, epidemiology, functional abnormalities, malignant degeneration, and surgical management. Dysphagia 8: 276–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Stein HJ, Hinder RA, DeMeester TR et al. (1990) Clinical use of 24-hour gastric pH monitoring vs. o-diisopropyl iminodiacetic acid ( DISIDA) scanning in the diagnostic of pathologic duodenogastric reflux. Arch Surg 125: 966–971

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Stein HJ, Barlow AP, DeMeester TR et al. (1992) Complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Role of the lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal acid and acid/alkaline exposure, and duodenogastric reflux. Ann Surg 216: 35–43

    Google Scholar 

  54. Stein HJ, Smyrk T, DeMeester TR et al. (1992) Sensitivity and specificity of endoscopy and histology in the diagnosis of excessive duodenogastric reflux. Surgery 112: 796–804

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Stein HJ, Hoeft S, DeMeester TR et al. (1992) Reflux and motility pattern in Barrett’s esophagus. Dis Esoph 5: 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  56. Stein HJ, Feussner H, Kauer WKH et al. (1994) „Alkaline” gastroesophageal reflux: Assessment by ambulatory esophageal aspiration and pH monitoring. Am J Surg 167: 163–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Stein HJ, Kraemer SJM, Feussner H et al. (1994) Quantifizierung des intenstino-ösophagealen Refluxes mit einer fiberoptischen Bilirubin-Meßsonde. Z Gastroenterol 32: 247–251

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Stein HJ, Stipa F, Korn O et al. (1995) Ambulatory 24-hour fiberoptic intra-esophageal measurement of bilirubin in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Langenbecks Arch 315–318

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tanaka K, Fromm F (1983) Effect of bile acid and salicylate on isolated surface and glandular cells of rabbit stomach. Surgery 93: 660–663

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Thomas AJ, Nahrwold DL, Rose RC (1972) Detergent action of sodium taurocholate on rat gastric mucosa. Biochim Biophys Acta 282: 210–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Vaezi MF, Richter JE (1994) Complicated Barrett’s esophagus: role of acid and bile (abstract) Am J Gastroenterol 89:1630 (A62)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Vaezi MF, LaCamera RG, Richter JE (1994) Bilitec 2000 ambulatory duodenogastric reflux monitoring system. Studies on its validation and limitation. Am J Physiol 30:1050–1056

    Google Scholar 

  63. Winkelstein A (1935) Peptic esophagitis. A new clinical entity. JAMA 104: 906–909

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kauer, W.K.H., Stein, H.J. (1997). Alkalischer Reflux. In: Fuchs, KH., Stein, H.J., Thiede, A. (eds) Gastrointestinale Funktionsstörungen. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60372-3_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60372-3_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64375-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60372-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics