Abstract
There are two points where the concept of Least-Cost Planning (LCP, which is used here in the same sense as the more modern wording of Integrated Resource Planning-IRP) and the concept of “external” social costs, especially environmental costs, interact.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) and California Energy Commission (CEC). 1987. Standard Practice Manual, Economic Analysis of Demand-Side Management Programs. CPUC& CEC, San Francisco& Sacramento, CA
Chamberlin, John, Patricia Herman, and Greg Wikler. 1993. Mitigating Rate Impacts of DSM Programs. The Electricity Journal, Vol. 6, No. 9, pp. 46–65.
ELSAM. 1994. Integrated Resource Planning: From Concept to Practice. Integrated Resource Planning in the Danish Electric Utilities, Main Report. ELSAM, Fredericia.
Friedrich, Rainer. 1993. Externe Kosten der Stromerzeugung, Probleme bei ihrer Quantifizierung. VWEW, Frankfurt/M.
Friedrich, Rainer, et al. 1990. Externe Kosten der Stromerzeugung, 2. Auflage. VWEW, Frankfurt/M
Hohmeyer, Olaf. 1989. Soziale Kosten des Energieverbrauchs, 2. Auflage. Springer, Berlin et al
Krause, Florentin, and Joseph Eto. 1988. Least-Cost Utility Planning, A Handbook for Regulatory Utility Commissioners. Part II: The Demand Side, Conceptual and Methodological Issues. National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Washington, DC
Leprich, Uwe 1994: Least-Cost Planning als Regulierungskonzept.Öko-Institut, Freiburg
Öko-Institute/Gesamthochschule Kassel (GhK). 1993. Gesamt-Emissions-Modell Integrierter Systeme (GEMIS) Version 2.0, Endbericht im Auftrag des Hessischen Ministeriums für Umwelt, Energie und Bundesangelegenheiten. Uwe R. Fritsche et al. Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Energie und Bundesangelegenheiten, Wiesbaden.
Öko-Institute and Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy. 1995. Least-Cost Planning Case Study Hannover, Final Report. Stadtwerke Hannover, Hannover.
Prognos AG. 1992. Die externen Kosten der Energieversorgung. Schäfer-Poeschel, Stuttgart
Wagner, H.-J., and A. Melchert. 1993: Auf dem Prüfstand: Externe Kosten, Analyse der drei Varianten der Hohmeyer-Studie. VWEW, Frankfurt/M
Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy and Beratungsgruppe Energie & Marketing (BEM). 1995. Evaluierung des KesS-Programms der RWE Energie AG, Endbericht. Peter Hennicke et al. Wuppertal Institute/BEM, Wuppertal/Icking.
Wuppertal Institute/Öko-Institute. 1994. Endbericht “Least-Cost Planning” im Auftrag der “Gruppe Energie 2010”. Peter Hennicke/Dieter Seifried. Wuppertal Institute/Öko-Insti-tute, Wuppertal/Freiburg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Thomas, S. (1997). Least-Cost Planning — An Instrument for Minimization of Social Costs. In: Hohmeyer, O., Rennings, K., Ottinger, R.L. (eds) Social Costs and Sustainability. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60365-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60365-5_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64372-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60365-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive