Skip to main content

Estimating Value-at-Risk Using Neural Networks

  • Conference paper
Informationssysteme in der Finanzwirtschaft

Zusammenfassung

There are various statistical techniques to estimate the market risk of a portfolio. This will most frequently be done by identifying market risk factors and modelling the impact of changes in market risk factors on the portfolio value. One increasingly popular measure for portfolio risk is the so called Value-at-Risk (VaR). This paper aims to show how VaR estimates can be obtained using a neural network approach. Results on a US-Dollar portfolio are compared to different VaR models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bundesaufsichtsamt für das Kreditwesen: Bekanntmachung über die Änderung und Ergänzung der Grundsätze über das Eigenkapital und die Liquidität der Kreditinstitute. Entwurf, October 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Basle Committee on Banking Supervision: An internal model-based approach to market risk requirements. Basle 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bishop, C. M.: Mixture density networks. Technical Report NCRG/94/004, Neural Computing Research Group, Aston University, Birmingham 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bishop, C. M.: Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brachinger, H. W.; Steinhauser, U.: Konzepte zur Messung von Risiko – vom intuitiven Risikobegriff zum Value at Risk. Dresdner Beiträge zu Quantitativen Verfahren Nr. 22/98.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Butler, J. S.; Schachter, B.: Improving value-at-risk estimates by combining kernel estimation with historical simulation. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN/Comptroller of the currency, Washington DC 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crnkov C.; Drachman, J.:Quality control. Risk Magazine. 9 (1996) 9, S. 138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hsieh, D. A.: Implications of nonlinear dynamics for financial risk management. In: Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28 (1993) 1, S. 39–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Husmeier, D.; Taylor, J. G.: Neural networks for predicting conditional probability densities: Improved training scheme combining EM and RVFL. Technical Report KCL-MTH-97–47. Dept. of Mathematics, King’s College London 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jorion, P.: Value at Risk: The new benchmark for controlling market risk. Irwin, Chicago, London, Singapore 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jordan, M. I.; Xu, L.: Convergence results for the EM approach to mixtures of experts architectures. Technical Report A.I. Memo No. 1458, MIT, November 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kupiec, P.: Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement methods. In: Journal of Derivatives 2 (1995), S. 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Locarek-Junge, H.; Prinzler, R.: Die Beurteilung von Marktrisiken mit Künstlichen Neuronalen Netzen. In: Biethahn, J.; Hoenerloh, A.; Kuhl, J.; Leisewitz, M.C.; Nissen, V; Tietze, M (Hrsg.): Betriebswirtschaftliche Anwendungen des Soft Computing: Neuronale Netze, Fuzzy Logic und Evolutionäre Algorithmen. Vieweg 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neuneier, R.; Hergert, F.; Finnoff, W.; Ormoneit, D.: Estimation of conditional densities: A comparison of neural network approaches. In: Int. Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. ICANN’94, Sorrento, Italy 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ormoneit, D.; Tresp, V.: Improved gaussian mixture density estimates using bayesian penalty terms and network averaging. Technical report, Institut für Informatik (H2) TU München, Siemens AG, Munich 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. P. Morgan/Reuters: RiskMetrics™-Technical Document. 4th edn., Morgan Guaranty Trust Company, Reuters Ltd, New York 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weigend, A. S.; Srivastava, A. N.: Predicting conditional probability distributions. In: International Journal of Neural Systems 6 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williams, P. M.: Using neural networks to model conditional multivariate densities. In: Neural Computation 8 (1996), S. 843–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Locarek-Junge, H., Prinzler, R. (1998). Estimating Value-at-Risk Using Neural Networks. In: Weinhardt, C., Selhausen, H.M.z., Morlock, M. (eds) Informationssysteme in der Finanzwirtschaft. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60327-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60327-3_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64355-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60327-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics