Skip to main content

Vertical Integration in the Electricity Supply Industry: Competition and Investment Issues

  • Conference paper
Towards Competition in Network Industries
  • 132 Accesses

Abstract

Mergers or long-term contracts between firms operating in the same industry but at different stages of supply, such as a manufacturing company and a retailer (e. g. oil companies and petrol stations) or a manufacturing company and a supplies of parts (e. g. car companies and their suppliers), have always been of interest to competition authorities. The potential for anticompetitive behavior following vertical mergers is, however, deemed to be less that in the case of horizontal mergers. Nevertheless, in the utilities — electricity, gas, telecommunications and water — the adverse effect of vertical integration on competition could be very important due to the low degree of competition in these sectors in the first place. Thus, natural monopoly characteristics and high sunk costs at one or more stages of supply have traditionally implied high firm concentration and monopolization. This together with state regulation raises the incentive for vertically integrated firms to stifle competition and deter entry in activities which are not naturally monopolistic (Yarrow, 1994; Vickers, 1995).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Besanko, D., D. Dranove. and M. Shanley (1996), The Economics of Strategy, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, P. and M. D. Whinston (1991), The ‘Foreclosure’ Effects of Vertical Mergers, in: Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 147, pp. 207 – 226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, D.W. and E. R. Larsen (1994), Assessment of the uncertainty in future UK electricity investment using an industry simulation model, in: Utilities Policy, Vol. 4, pp. 229 – 236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, E.D. (1996), Electric Utility Regulation in the European Union: A Country by Country Guide, Chicester: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times (1996), 9.12.1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times (1996b) 22.06.1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graack, C. (1996), Telecom operators in the European Union: Internationalization strategies and network alliances, in: Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 341 – 355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O.D. and J. Tirole. (1990), Vertical Integration and Market Foreclosure, in: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp 205–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjalmarsson, L. (1996), From club-regulation to market competition in the Scandinavian electricity supply industry, in: Gilbert, R.J. and Khan, E.P. (eds.), International Comparisons of Electricity Regulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA-International Energy Agency (1994), Electricity Supply Industry: Structure, Ownership and Regulation in OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (1995), Energy Policies of the Russian Federation, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (1996a), The Role of IEA Governments in Energy, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (1996b), Energy Policies of IEA Countries. 1996 Review, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P.L. (1985), Vertical Integration and Long-Term Contracts: The Case of Coal-Burning Electric Generating Plants, in: Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 33, pp. 32 – 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumkar, L. (1995), Widerstände und Spannungen auf dem Weg zum europäischen Binnenmarkt für Elektrizität, in: Weltwirtschaft, No. 4, pp. 444 – 470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumkar, L. (1996a), Wettbewerb im Stromsektor der USA I: Re-regulierung der Groβhandelsebene, Kiel Working Paper No. 738, Kiel Institute of World Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumkar, L. (1996b), “Wettbewerb im Stromsektor der USA I: Re-regulierung der Groβhandelsebene,” Kiel Working Paper No. 739, Kiel Institute of World Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1992), Economics, Organization and Management, London: Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • MMC — Monopolies and Mergers Commission (1996), PowerGen pic and Midlands Electricity plc: A report on the proposed merger, Cm 3231, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordover, J.A., G. Saloner and S. C. Salop (1990), Equilibrium Vertical Foreclosure, in: American Economic Review, Vol. 80, pp. 127 – 142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. (1996), Competition: the Continuing Issues, in: Surrey, J. (ed.), The British Electricity Experiment, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M.K. (1989), Vertical Integration: Determinants and Effects, in: Schmalensee, R. and R. D. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, P.T. and L. V. Martorell (1996), How should it be done? Electricity regulation in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Chile, in: Gilbert, R.J. and E. P. Khan, eds., International Comparisons of Electricity Regulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterson, M. (1993), Vertical Integration and Vertical Restraints, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 9, pp. 41 – 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, 0. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, J. (1995), Competition and Regulation in Vertically Related Markets, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 62, pp. 1 – 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, J. and G. Yarrow (1988), Privatization: An Economic Analysis, Cambridge ( Mass. ): MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarrow, G. (1991), Vertical Supply Arrangements: Issues and Applications int the Energy Industries, in: Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 7, pp. 35 – 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarrow, G. (1994), Privatization, Restructuring, and Regulatory Reform in Electricity Supply, in: Bishop, M., J. Kay and C. Mayer, eds., Privatization and Economic Performance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sinclair, A., Palinkas, P. (1999). Vertical Integration in the Electricity Supply Industry: Competition and Investment Issues. In: Welfens, P.J.J., Yarrow, G., Grinberg, R., Graack, C. (eds) Towards Competition in Network Industries. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60189-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60189-7_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64296-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60189-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics