Skip to main content

Experience with Continuous Absorbable Suture for Laparotomy Closure

  • Conference paper
Incisional Hernia
  • 240 Accesses

Abstract

Suture material and suture technique may affect wound healing. Most surgeons now use a continuous or interrupted mass closure technique, and most studies performed have not shown differences in wound complication rates between these methods. Most authors favour the continuous technique because it is faster and cheaper [1–5].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gislason H, Grønbech JE, Søreide O. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations - Comparison of three closure techniques. Eur J Surg 1995; 161: 349–354.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sahlin S, Ahlberg J, Granström L, Ljungstrom KG. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure. Br J Surg 1993;80:322–324.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fagniez PL, Hay JM, Lacàine F, Thomsen C. Abdominal midline incision closure. Arch Surg 1985;120:1351–1353.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Richards PC, Balch CM, Aldrete JS. Abdominal wound closure. Ann Surg 1983;197:238–243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Trimbos JB, Smit IB, Holm JP, Hermans J. A randomized clinical trial comparing two methods of fascia closure following midline laparotomy. Arch Surg 1992;127:1232–1234.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Santora TA, Roslyn JJ. Incisional hernia. Surg Clin North Am 1993;73:557–570.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoetz DJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Closure of abdominal wounds with polydioxanone. Arch Surg 1988;123:72–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bucknall TE, Ellis H. Abdominal wound closure- A comparison of monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid. Surgery 1981;89:672–677.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Leaper DJ, Pollock AV, Evans M. Abdominal wound closure: a trial of nylon, polyglycolic acid and steel sutures. Br J Surg 1977;64:603–606.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wissing J, Th JMV van Vroonhoven, ME Schattenkerk, HF Veen, RJG Ponsen, Jeekel J. Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial. Br J Surg 1987;74:738–741.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Osther PJ, Gjøde P, Mortensen BB, Bartholin J, Gottrup F. Randomized comparison of polyglycolic acid and polyglyconate sutures for abdominal fascial closure after laparotomy in patients with suspected impaired wound healing. Br J Surg 1995;82:1080–1082.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Closure of midline laparotomy incisions with polydioxanone and nylon: the importance of suture technique. Br J Surg 1994;81:1606–1608.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kendall SWH, Brennan TG, Guillou PJ. Suture length to wound length ratio and the integrity of midline and lateral paramedian incisions. Br J Surg 1991;78:705–707.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Krukowski ZH, Cusick EL, Engesest J, Matheson NA. Polydioxanone or polypropylene for closure of midline abdominal incisions: a prospective comparative clinical trial. Br J Surg 1987;74:828–830.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bucknall TE, Cox PJ, Ellis H. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: a prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies. BMJ 1982;27:931–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Medina M, Sillero M, Martinez-Gallego G, Delgado-Rodriguez M. Risk factors of surgical wound infection in patients undergoing herniorrhaphy. Eur J Surg 1997;163:191–198.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Corman ML, Veidenheimer MC, Coller JA: Controlled clinical trial of three suture materials for abdominal wall closure after bowel operations. Am J Surg 1981; 141:510–513.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jenkins TPN. The burst abdominal wound: a mechanical approach. Br J Surg 1976;63:873–876.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gislason, H. (1999). Experience with Continuous Absorbable Suture for Laparotomy Closure. In: Schumpelick, V., Kingsnorth, A.N. (eds) Incisional Hernia. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60123-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60123-1_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64267-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60123-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics