Skip to main content

From Object-Relational to Federated Databases

  • Conference paper
Datenbanksysteme in Büro, Technik und Wissenschaft

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((INFORMAT))

Abstract

Object-relational databases allow users to manipulate rich data types that are not supported by traditional relational database systems. However, the majority of such data are in systems that are outside of that database—either in file systems, specialized systems, hierarchical databases, or other varieties of relational database that do not provide as rich a level of abstraction. Users want to take advantage of object-relational technology to exploit the rich semantics and abstraction but cannot afford to change existing applications or to move that data into the database to do so. The solution for enterprises is a federated database system, which allows users to leverage their existing applications and existing data, while allowing new applications to exploit the functional richness of object-relational technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Bayer and E.M. McCreight. Organization and maintenance of large ordered indices. Acta Informatica, 1 (3): 173–189, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Carey, D. DeWitt: Of Objects and Databases: A Decade of Turmoil. VLDB Conference 1996: pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Chen, J. Chow, Y. Fuh. M. Jou, N. Mattos, B. Tran, Y. Wang. UDS: An Extensible Architecture for User-Defined Search. submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Comer. The ubiquitous b-tree. ACM Computing Surveys, 2 (11): 121–137, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Chrysanthis and K. Ramamritham. Impact of autonomy requirements on transactions and their management in heterogeneous distributed database systems. Proceedings of the DBTA Workshop on Interoperability of Database Systems and Database applications, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Chrysanthis and K. Ramamritham. Autonomy requirements in heterogeneous distributed database systems. Proceedings of the conference on the Advances on Data Management, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. de Ferreira Rezende and K. Hergula. The Heterogeneity Problem and Middleware Technology: Experiences with and Performance of Database Gateways. Proc. International Conference on Very Large Databases, pp. 146–157. New York, August, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Final Committee Draft Database Language SQL- Part 2: Foundation ( SQL/Foundation), by Jim Melton (ed. ), September 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Hammer and D. McLeod. An approach to resolving semantic heterogeneity in a federation of autonomous, heterogeneous, database systems. Internation Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 2(1). PP 51–83, March 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T.Y. Leung, H. Pirahesh, P. Seshadri, and J. Hellerstein. Query Rewrite Optimization Rules in IBM DB2 Universal Database. Readings in Database Systems, Third Edition. M. Stonebraker and J. Hellerstein (eds. ), 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Tamer Özsu and P. Valduriez: Principles of Distributed Database Systems, Prentice Hall, p. 79, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Pirahesh, J.M. Hellerstein, and W. Hasan. Extensible/Rule Based Query Rewrite Optimization in Starburst. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 39–48, San Diego, June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Pirahesh, T.Y. Leung, and W. Hasan. A Rule Engine for Query Transformation in Starburst and IBM DB2 C/S DBMS. IEEE Twelfth International Conference on Data Engineering, April 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Tork Roth, P. Schwarz: Don’t Scrap It, Wrap It! A Wrapper Architecture for Legacy Data Sources. VLDB Conference 1997, pp. 266–275.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Stonebraker, P. Brown, with D. Moore: Object-Relational DBMSs. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Sheth and J. Larson. Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Computing Surveys, 22 (3). pp. 183–236, Sept 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mattos, N.M., Kleewein, J., Roth, M.T., Zeidenstein, K. (1999). From Object-Relational to Federated Databases. In: Buchmann, A.P. (eds) Datenbanksysteme in Büro, Technik und Wissenschaft. Informatik aktuell. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60119-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60119-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65606-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60119-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics