Skip to main content

Claim Support: Ethical Aspects for Conducting Human Studies

  • Chapter
Cosmetics
  • 725 Accesses

Abstract

The EU Cosmetics Directive requires that: “A cosmetic product put on the market within the Community must not cause damage to human health when applied under normal or reasonably foreseeable conditions of use, taking account, in particular, of the product’s presentation, its labelling, any instructions for its use and disposal as well as any other indication or information provided by the manufacturer or his authorized agent or by any other person responsible for placing the product on the Community market” [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anon (1993) Council Directive 93/35/EEC of 14 June 1993 amending for the sixth time Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. Off J Eur Commun LI 51:32–36

    Google Scholar 

  2. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1993) OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals: health effects. Paris, OECD, vol 2, section 4

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anon (1992) Annex V to Commision Directive 92/69/EEC adapting to technical progress for the seventeenth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Off J Eur Commun L383 A: 124–139

    Google Scholar 

  4. Botham PA, Earl LK, Fentem JH, Roguet R, van de Sandt JJM (1998) Alternative methods for skin irritation testing: the current status. ECVAM skin irritation task force report 1. ATLA. 26,195–211

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balls M, Basketter D, Berardesca E, Edwards C, Eisner P, Ennen J, Leveque JL, Loden M, Masson P, Parra J, Paye M, Pierard G, Rodrigues L, Rogiers V, Salter D, Schaefer H, Zuang V (1998) Non-invasive measurements in human volunteers and their potential use in the safety assessment of cosmetics. ECVAM workshop report. ATLA, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Silva O, Basketter DA, Barratt MD, Corsini E, Cronin MTD, Das PK, Degwert J, Enk A, Garrigue JL, Hauser C, Kimber I, Lepoittevin JP, Peguet J, Ponec M (1996) Alternative methods for skin sensitisation testing. ECVAM workshop report 19. ATLA. 24:683–705

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schlatter C, Reinhardt CA (1985) Acute irritation tests in risk assessment. Food Chem Toxicol 23:45–148

    Google Scholar 

  8. Basketter DA, Whittle E, Chamberlain M (1994) Identification of irritation and corrosion hazards to skin: an alternative strategy to animal testing. Food Chem Toxicol 32:539–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Basketter DA, Chamberlain M, Griffiths HA, Rowson M, Whittle E, York M (1997) The classification of skin irritants by human patch test. Food Chem Toxicol 35:845–852

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. DHSS (Department of Health and Social Security, UK) (1982) Report No. 27 on health and social subjects. Guidelines for the testing of chemicals for toxicity, pp 1-57

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia C, Chesne C (1996) In vitro approaches for cosmetic product development and claim substantiation. Cosmetics and Toiletries Manufacture Worldwide, p. 267-268

    Google Scholar 

  12. Annas JG (1992). Regulation of human experimentation. The changing landscape of human experimentation: Nuremberg, Helsinki, and beyond. J Law Med 2:119–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Federal Register (FDA) (1981) Protection of human subjects: informed consent. Standards for institutional review boards for clinical investigations, vol 46, No. 17, pp 8942–8980

    Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organisation (1982) Proposed international guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, Geneva, pp 1-45

    Google Scholar 

  15. Royal College of Physicians (1986) Research on healthy volunteers. J R Coll Physicians Lond 20:243–257

    Google Scholar 

  16. World Medical Association (1989) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. 41st World Medical Assembly, Hong Kong, September 1989

    Google Scholar 

  17. CPMP Working Party on Efficacy of Medicinal Products (1990)EEC note for guidance: good clinical practice for trials on medicinal products in the European Community. Pharmacol Toxicol 67:361–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. COLIPA/SCAAT (1996) The Colipa position paper on human testing for skin compatibility of products or skin tolerance of potentially irritant cosmetic ingredients. Doc 96/304

    Google Scholar 

  19. Royal College of Physicians (1986) Guidelines on the practice of ethics committees in medical research involving human subjects. The Royal College of Physicians of London, pp 1-43.2nd edn 1990

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ward R, Clothier R (1997) The use of human volunteers in cosmetic efficacy and safety testing. ECVAM contract report. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gompertz D (1994) Of mice or men? Hum Exp Toxicol 13:381–382 (editorial)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zuang, V. (1999). Claim Support: Ethical Aspects for Conducting Human Studies. In: Elsner, P., Maibach, H.I., Merk, H.F. (eds) Cosmetics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59869-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59869-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64160-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59869-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics