Skip to main content

Contact Urticaria Syndrome and Claims Support

  • Chapter
Cosmetics
  • 719 Accesses

Abstract

Contact urticaria syndrome (CUS) was first defined by Maibach and Johnson [28], and since then numerous reports of contact urticaria to a variety of compounds such as foods, preservatives, fragrances, plant and animal products, metals and others, continue to be reported. Therefore, it is important to determine, in a scientific manner, whether or not a particular substance causes contact urticaria, and in what dose. Accurate experimental models are required to document urticaria-inducing properties of a substance; we also propose protocols to quantify efficacy of formulations that putatively inhibit CUS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agner T (1995) Ultrasound A mode measurement of skin thickness. In: Serup J, Jemel GBE (eds) Handbook of non-invasive methods and the skin, chap 12.5. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agner T, Serup J (1989) Skin reactions to irritants assessed by non-invasive bioengineering methods. Contact Dermatitis 20:352–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Amin S, Maibach HI (1997) Immunologic contact urticaria definition. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI (eds) Contact urticaria syndrome, chap 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andersen PH, Bjerring P (1995) Remittance spectroscopy: hardware and measuring principles. In: Berardesca E, Eisner P, Maibach HI (eds) Bioengineering of the skin: cutaneous blood flow and erythema, chap 17. (CRC series in dermatology) CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berardesca E (1995) Erythema measurements in diseased skin. In: Berardesca E, Eisner P, Maibach HI (eds) Bioengineering of the skin: cutaneous blood flow and erythema, chap 20. (CRC series in dermatology) CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berardesca E,Gabba P,Nume A, RabbiosiG, Maibach HI (1992) Objective prick test evaluation: noninvasive techniques. Acta Derm Venereol, 1992 Aug 72(4)261–263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bircher AJ (1995) Skin Pharmacology, In: Berardesca E, Eisner P, Maibach HI (eds) Bioengineering of the Skin: Cutaneous blood flow and erythema, chap 6. CRC Press Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bircher AJ, Guy RH, Maibach HI (1990) Skin pharmacology and dermatology. In: Shepherd AP, Oberg PA (eds) Laser-Doppler blood flowmetry. Kluwer Academic, Boston, pp 141–174

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blanken R, van der Valk PGM, Nater JP (1986) Laser-doppler flowmetry in the investigation of irritant compounds on the human skin. Dermatosen Beruf Umwelt 34:5–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisner P (1995) Chromametry: hardware, measuring principles, and standardisation of measurements. In: Berardesca E, Eisner P, Maibach HI (eds) Bioengineering of the skin: cutaneous blood flow and erythema, chap 19. (CRC series in dermatology) CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frosch PJ, Kligman AM (1979) The soap chamber test. J Am Acad Dermatol 1:35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gollhausen R, Kligman AM (1985) Human assay for identifying substances which induce non-allergic contact urticaria: the NICU test. Contact Dermatitis 13:98–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hannuksela M (1997) Mechanisms in contact urticaria. Clin Dermatol 15:619–922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson Roberts L II, Morrow JD (1997) Prostaglandin D2 mediates contact urticaria caused by sorbic acid, benzoic acid, and esters of nicotinic acid. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI (ed) Contact urticaria syndrome, chap 8. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jaeger D, Kleinhans D, Czuppon AB, Baur X (1992) Latex specific proteins causing immediate type cutaneous, nasal, bronchial and systemic reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 89:759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanerva L, Toikkanen J, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1996) Statistical data on occupational contact urticaria, Contact Dermatitis, 35:229–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Toikkanen J, Estlander T (1997) Statistics on occupational contact urticaria. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI (eds) Contact Urticaria Syndrome Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida:57–70

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lahti A (1980) Nonimmunologic contact urticaria. Acta Derm Venereol 60: Suppl 91:1–49

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lahti A (1987) Terfrenadine (HI-antagonist) does not inhibit nonimmunological contact urticaria. Contact Dermatitis 16:220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lahti A (1995) Immediate contact reactions. In: Rycroft RJG, Menne T, Frosch PJ (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis, chap 2.3. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lahti A (1997) Nonimmunologic contact urticaria. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI (eds) Contact urticaria syndrome, chap 3. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lahti A, Maibach HI (1984) An animal model for nonimmunologic contact urticaria. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 76:219–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lahti A, Maibach HI (1986) Immediate contact reactions (contact urticaria syndrome). In: Maibach HI (ed) Occupational and industrial dermatology, 2nd edn. Year Book Medical, Chicago, pp 32–44

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lahti A, Väänänen A, Kokkonen EL, Hannuksela M (1987) Acetylsalicylic acid inhibits non-immunologic contact urticaria. Contact Dermatitis 16:133–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Laurema Al, Maibach HI (1997) Model for Immunologic Contact Urticaria. In: AmIn S, Lahti A, Maibach HI (eds) Contact Urticaria Syndrome Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida:57–70

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li Q, Aoyama K, Matsushita T (1992) Evaluation of contact allergy to chemicals using a laser doppler flowmetry (LDF) technique. Contact Dermatitis 26:27–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Maibach HI (1986) Regional variation in elicitation of contact urticaria syndrome (immediate hypersensitivity syndrome). Shrimp. Contact Dermatitis 15:100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Maibach HI, Johnson HL (1975) Contact urticaria syndrome: contact urticaria to diethyltoluamide (immediate type hypersensitivity). Arch Dermatol 111:726–730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Morrow JD (1995) Prostaglandin D2 and contact urticaria. In: Berardesca E, Eisner P, Maibach HI (eds) Bioengineering of the skin: cutaneous blood flow and erythema, chap 8. (CRC series in dermatology) CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  30. Morrow JD, Minon TA, Awad JA, Roberts LJ II (1994) Release of markedly increased quantities of prostaglandin D2 from the skin in vivo in humans following the application of sorbic acid. Arch Dermatol 130:1408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pershing LK, Heuther S, Conklin RL, Krueger GG (1989) Cutaneous blood flow and percutaneous absorption: a quantitative analysis using a laser doppler flow meter and a blood flow meter. J Invest Dermatol 92:355–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Schriner DL, Maibach HI (1996) Regional variation of nonimmunologic contact urticaria. Functional map of the human face. Skin Pharmacol 9:312–321

    Google Scholar 

  33. Serup J, Staberg B, Klemp P (1984) Quantification of cutaneous edema in patch test reaction by measurement of skin thickness with high frequency pulsed ultrasound. Contact Dermatitis 10: 88–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Spriet A, Dupin-Spriet T, Simon P (1994) Selection of subjects. In: Spriet A, Dupin-Spriet T, Simon P (eds) Methodology of clinical drug trials, chap 3. Karger, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  35. Turjanmaa K, Makinen-Kiljunen S, Ruenala T, Alenius H, Palosuo T (1995) Natural rubber latex allergy: the European experience. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 15:71–88

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wilhelm KP, Surber C, Maibach HI (1989) Quantification of sodium lauryl sulfate irritant dermatitis in man: Comparison of four techniques: skin colour reflectance, transepidermal water loss, laser Doppler flow measurement and visual scores. Arch Dermatol Res 281:293–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bashir, S.J., Maibach, H.I. (1999). Contact Urticaria Syndrome and Claims Support. In: Elsner, P., Maibach, H.I., Merk, H.F. (eds) Cosmetics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59869-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59869-2_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64160-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59869-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics