Skip to main content

Racial Differences in Skin Function: Related to Claim Support

  • Chapter
Cosmetics

Abstract

Racial variability in skin function is an area in which data are often conflicting. The understanding and quantifying of racial differences in skin function are of importance for skin care and the prevention and treatment of skin diseases. A key feature that characterizes race is skin color: is deeply pigmented skin (black or brown) different than fair skin in terms of responses to chemical and environmental insults? Is skin care the same? Is there a different risk among racial groups to develop a skin disease after exposure to the same insults? The issue is difficult to define and the interpretation of pathophysiologic phenomena should consider not only anatomical and functional characteristics of ethnic groups, but also socioeconomic, hygienic and nutritional factors. Indeed, even though it is well established that all humans belong to the same species, many physical differences exist among human populations. These differences, appeared during the latest stages of evolution, could be due both to genetic and environmental factors [1]. This paper reviews and discusses recent findings as relates to claim support.

Modified with permission from [1]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shriver MD (1997) Ethnic variation as a key to the biology of human disease. Ann Intern Med 127:401–403

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Freeman RG, Cockerell EG, Armstrong J et al. (1962) Sunlight as a factor influencing the thickness of epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 39:295–297

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomson ML (1955) Relative efficiency of pigment and horny layer thickness in protecting the skin of European and Africans against solar ultraviolet radiation. J Physiol (Lond) 127:236

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weigand DA, Haygood C, Gaylor JR (1974) Cell layers and density of Negro and Caucasians stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 62:563–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rienertson RP, Wheatley VR (1959) Studies on the chemical composition of human epidermal lipids. J Invest Dermatol 32:49–51

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson LC, Corah NL (1963) Racial differences in skin resistance. Science 139:766–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Corcuff P, Lotte C, Rougier A, Maibach H (1991) Racial differences in corneocytes. Acta Dermatol Venereol (Stockh) 71:146–148

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sugino K, Imokawa G, Maibach H (1993) Ethnic difference of stratum corneum lipid in relation to stratum corneum function. J Invest Dermatol 100:597

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kompaore F, Marty JP, Dupont Ch (1993) In vivo evaluation of the stratum corneum barrier function in Blacks, Caucasians and Asians with two noninvasive methods. Skin Pharmacol 6:200–207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reed JT, Ghadially R, Elias PM (1994) Effect of race, gender and skin type on epidermal permeability barrier function. J Invest Dermatol 102:537

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson R, Parrish J (1981) The optics of human skin. J Invest Dermatol 77:13–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pathak MA, Fitzpatrick TB (1974) The role of natural photoprotective agents in human skin. In: Fitzpatrick TB, Pathak MA, Harber RC et al. (eds) Sunlight and man. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 725–750

    Google Scholar 

  13. Everett MA, Yeagers E, Sayre RM et al. (1966) Penetration of epidermis by ultraviolet rays. Photochem Photobiol 5:533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaidbey KH, Poh Agin P, Sayre RM et al. (1979) Photoprotection by melanin-a comparison of black and Caucasian skin. Am Acad Dermatol 1:249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Szabo G, Gerald AB, Pathak MA (1969) Racial differences in the fate of melanosomes in human epidermis. Nature 222:1081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hausser KW, Vahle W (1969) Sunburn and suntanning. In: Urbach F (ed) The biologic effect of ultraviolet radiation. Pergamon, London, pp 13–21

    Google Scholar 

  17. Olson RL, Gaylor J, Everett MA (1973) Skin color, melanin and erythema. Arch Dermatol 108:541–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stoughton RB (1969) Bioassay methods for measuring percutaneous absorption. In: Montagna W, Stoughton RB, Van Scott EJ (eds) Pharmacology of the skin. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, p 542

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bronaugh RL, Stewart FR, Simon M (1986) Methods for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies VII: use of excised human skin. J Pharm Sci 75:1094

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Berardesca E, Maibach HI (1989) Physical antrolopgy and skin: a model for exploring skin function. In: Maibach HI, Lowe N (eds) Models in dermatology 4. Karger, Basel, pp 202–208

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wickema-Sinha WJ, Shaw SR, Weber OJ (1978) Percutaneous absorption and excretion ot tritiumlabelled diflorasone diacetate, a new topical corticosteroid in the rat, monkey and man. J Invest Dermatol 71:372–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hymes JA, Spraker MK (1986) Racial differences in the effectiveness of a topically applied mixture of local anesthetics. Reg Anesth 11:11–13

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wedig JH, Maibach HI (1981) Percutaneous penetration of dipyrithione in man: effect of skin color (race). Am Acad Dermatol 5:433–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Guy RH, Tur E, Bierke S et al. (1985)Are there age and racial differences to mrthyl nicotinate-induced vasodilatation in human skin? J Am Acad Dermatol 12:1001

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Berardesca E, Maibach HI (1988) Contact dermatitis in blacks. Dermatol Clin 6:363–368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin S, Ho H, Chien YW (1993) Development of a new nicotine transdermal delivery system: in vitro kinetics studies and clinical pharmacokinetic evaluations in two ethnic groups. J Contr Rel 26:175–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Berardesca E,de Rigal J,Leveque JL, Maibach HI (1991) In vivo biophysical characterization of skin physiological differences in races. Dermatologica 182:89–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Berardesca E, Maibach HI (1988) Racial differences in sodium lauryl sulphate induced cutaneous irritation: Black and white. Contact Dermatitis 18:65–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Berardesca E, Maibach HI (1988) Sodium lauryl sulphate induced cutaneous irritation. Comparison of white and Hispanic subjects. Contact Dermatitis 19:136–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rietschel RL (1978) A method to evaluate skin moisturizers in vivo. J Invest Dermatol 70:152–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilson D, Berardesca E, Maibach HI (1988) In vitro transepidermal water loss: differences between black and white human skin. Br J Dermatol 119:647–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Marshall EK, Lynch V, Smith HV (1919) Variation in susceptibility of the skin to dichloroethylsulfide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 12:291–301

    Google Scholar 

  33. Edgewood Arsenal Technical Report (1970) The cutaneous irritant reaction to agent O-chlorobenzylidene malonitrile (CS). Quantitation and racial influence in human subjects. Edgewood Arsenal Technical Report 4332, February 1970

    Google Scholar 

  34. Weigand DA, Gaylor JR (1974) Irritant reaction in Negro and Caucasian skin. South Med J 67:548–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Frosh P, Kligman AM (1981) A method for appraising the stinging capacity of topically applied substances. J Soc Cosmet Chem 28:197

    Google Scholar 

  36. Grove GL, Soschin DM, Kligman AM (1984) Adverse subjective reactions to topical agents. In: Drill VA, Lazar P (eds) Cutaneous toxicology. Raven, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kenney J (1970) Dermatoses seen in American Negroes. Int J Dermatol 9:110–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Marshall J, Heyl T (1963) Skin diseases in the Western Cape Province. S Afr Med J 37:1308

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dogliotti M (1970) Skin disorders in the Bantu: a survey of 2000 cases from Baragwanath Hospital. S Afr Med J 44:670

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Scott F (1972) Skin diseases in the South African Bantu. In: Marshall J (ed) Essays on tropical dermatology. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kligman AM, Epstein W (1975) Updating the maximization test for identifying contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1:231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Fisher AA (1977) Contact dermatitis in black patients. Cutis 20:303–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Olumide YM (1985) Contact dermatitis in Nigeria. Contact Dermatitis 12:241–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Fregert S, Hjorth N, Magnusson B et al. (1969) Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. Trans St John’s Hosp Dermatol Soc 55:17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fisher AA (1976) Vitiligo due to contactants. Cutis 17:431–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kahn G (1970) Depigmentation caused by phenolic detergent germicides. Arch Dermatol 102:177–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Verhagen AR (1974) Pomade acne in black patients. Arch Dermatol 110:465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Plewig G, Fulton JE, Kligman AM (1970) Pomade acne. Arch Dermatol 101:580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kaidbey KH, Kligman AM (1974) A human model for coal tar acne. Arch Dermatol 109:212–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Berardesca E, Maibach HI (1989) Cutaneous reactive hyperaemia: racial differences induced by corticoid application. Br J Dermatol 120:787–794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Andersen KE, Maibach HI (1979) Black and white human skin differences. I Am Acad Dermatol 1:276–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Berardesca E, Maibach H (1996) Racial differences in skin pathophysiology. J Am Acad Dermatol 34:667–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berardesca, E., Maibach, H.I. (1999). Racial Differences in Skin Function: Related to Claim Support. In: Elsner, P., Maibach, H.I., Merk, H.F. (eds) Cosmetics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59869-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59869-2_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64160-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59869-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics