Skip to main content

The Transfer of Organizing Principles in the World Auto Industry: Cross-Cultural Influences on Replication at Opel Eisenach

  • Conference paper
Book cover Automation in Automotive Industries
  • 258 Accesses

Abstract

The world auto industry is currently experiencing the gradual diffusion of new organizing principles for manufacturing work, linked to a model of the overall production system — often called ″lean production″ (Womack, Jones, and Roos, 1990) or ″flexible production″ (MacDuffie, 1995) — that has significant productivity and quality advantages over traditional mass production. These organizing principles are increasingly likely to become the dominant model for automotive manufacturing. This provides an important opportunity to assess the extent and nature of the diffusion process, particularly across national borders, in light of past theories about the transfer of this kind of knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brannan, Mary Yoko and Jane Salk. 1994. “Cultural Dynamics in Biculturai Work Settings: Empirical Examples of Negotiated Culture”, presented at Academy of International Business conference, Boston, MA, Nov. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, Michael. 1985. The Japanese Auto Industry: Technology and Management at Toyota and Nissan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J. and Walter W. Powell. 1991. The New Institutionalism in.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, Richard and Martin Kenney. 1991. ″Transplanted Organizations: The Transfer of Japanese Industrial Organization to the U.S.″ American Sociological Review Vol. 56 (June), pp. 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Geert, M.H. Bond, and CL. Luk. 1993. “Individual Perceptions of Organizational Cultures: A Methodological Treatise on Levels of Analysis ”, Organizational Studies. Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 483–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce and Udo Zander. 1992. ″Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology.″ Organization Science. Vol. 3, No. 3 (August), pp. 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce. 1993. “On the importance of being inert,” in Organizational Theory and the Multinational Corporation. Sumantra Ghoshal and D. Eleanor Westney (eds.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewchuk, Wayne. 1988. American Technology and the British Car Industry. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDuffie, John Paul. 1995. ″Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance-Organizational Logic and Flexible Production in the World Auto Industry,″ Industrial and Labor Relations Review. Vol. 48, No. 2 (January), pp. 192–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDuffie, John Paul and Frits Pil. 1995. “Work Practices and Manufacturing Performance in the World Auto Industry: The Diffusion and Adaptation of Lean Production in the U.S., Europe, and Japan,” submitted to Industrial Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard and Sidney Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, Gabriel. 1994. “Unpacking Stickiness: An Empirical Investigation of the Barriers to Transfer of Best Practice Inside the Firm,” working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, Michael and Elaine Romanelli. 1985. “Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation,” in B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 7: 171–222. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Stephen. 1994. “Culturally-Responsive Strategies in Negotiation: Developing Empirical Tests and Training Implications,” presented at Academy of International Business conference, Boston, MA, Nov. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westney, Eleanor. 1987. Imitation and Innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Sidney. 1995. “Four Rs of Profitability: Rents, Resources, Routines, and Replication,” in Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Finn: Towards a Synthesis. Cynthia Montgomery (ed.), Hingham, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 147–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, James, Daniel Jones and Daniel Roos. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Rawson-MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

MacDuffie, J.P. (1999). The Transfer of Organizing Principles in the World Auto Industry: Cross-Cultural Influences on Replication at Opel Eisenach. In: Comacchio, A., Volpato, G., Camuffo, A. (eds) Automation in Automotive Industries. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59864-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59864-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64157-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59864-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics