Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Automation in Automotive Industries pp 62–73Cite as

Automation Strategies at the First-Tier Suppliers in Japan: Process Development and Product Trajectory. Hypothesis on the Supplier-Assembler Relationship

  • Conference paper

  • 261 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present some hypotheses on assembly automation strategies at “sfirst-tire” auto parts suppliers in Japan. By assembly automation strategy, we mean a coherent set of decisions on building and utilizing capabilities of assembly automation in order to improve manufacturing performance.

This paper is an outcome from the research project which is financially supported by The Matsushita International Foundation and The Ministry of Education,Science,Sports and Culture of Japan (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (1) 08303012). The author is grateful to Prof. Koichi Shimokawa (Hosei University) and Prof. Takahiro Fujimoto (University of Tokyo) for constructive comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abernathy, William J. (1978) The Productivity Dilemma: Roadblock to Innovation in the Automobile Industry, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abernathy, William J., Kim B. Clark and Alan M. Kantrow (1983). Industrial Renaissance. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amikura, Hisanaga (1992) “Manufacturing Systems as the Learning Mechanism: Cases from Automobile Industry,” Working Paper Series #91M006, Economics Association for Chiba University, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asanuma, Banri (1989). “Manufacturer-Supplier Relationship in Japan and the Concept of Relation Specific Skill.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, 3, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asanuma, Banri and T. Kinutani (1989). “Risk Absorption in Japanese Subcontracting: A Microeconomics Study of the Automobile Industry.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, 6, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Kim. B. (1996) “Competing through Manufacturing and the New Manufacturing Paradigm: Is Manufacturing Strategy Pass??” Journal of Production and OperationsManagement 5, no. 1 (Spring).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Kim B., and Takahiro Fujimoto (1991). Product Development Performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Robert E., and Paul S. Adler (1993). Designed for Learning: A Tale of Two Auto Factories.″ Sloan Management Review, Spring, pp. 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, Michael A. (1985). The Japanese Automobile Industry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, Michael A. and Akira Takeishi (1991). “Supplier Relations and Management: A Survey of Japanese, Japanese-Transplant, and U.S. Auto Plants.” Strategic Management Journal, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J. and Walter W. Powell (1983) “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”, American Sociological Review, vol. 48 (April), pp. 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni (1982) “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories”, Research Policy, vol. (11), pp. 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, Takahiro (1992 a). “Why Do Japanese Auto Companies Automate Assembly Operations?” Presented at the Berlin Workshop on Assembly Automation. November, Fujimoto, Takahiro 1992. Research Institute for the Japanese Economy Discussion Paper 92-F-15, University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, Takahiro (1992 b). “What Do You Mean by Automation Ratio?” Presented at the Berlin Workshop on Assembly Automation. November, 1992. Research Institute for the Japanese Economy Discussion Paper 92-F-16, University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, Takahiro (1993 a). “Imakoso Balance-gata Lean Hoshiki Wo Mézase.” (Go For the Lean-on-Balance System Now). Ekonomisuto, Mainichi News Paper, March 2, pp. 18–25. (English translation is forthcoming from Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Germany.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, Takahiro (1993 b). “At a Crossroads.” Look Japan, September 1993. pp. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, Takahiro (1993 c). “Strategies for Assembly Automation in the Automobile Industry.” Paper presented at The International Conference on Assembly Automation and Future Outlook of Production Systems. Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan. November, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, Takahiro (1994 a). “The Origin and Evolution of the Black Box Parts’ Practice in the Japanese Auto Industry” Research Institute for the Japanese Economy Discussion Paper 94-F-l, University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, Takahiro (1994 b). “Reinterpreting the Resource-Capability View of the Finn: A Case of the Development-Production Systems of the Japanese Auto Makers” Research Institute for the Japanese Economy Discussion Paper 94-F-20, University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, Takahiro (1994 c). “The Dynamic Aspect of Product Development Capabilities: An International Comparison in the Automobile Industry” Research Institute for the Japanese Economy Discussion Paper 94-F-29, University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, Takahiro (1995). “Buhin Torihiki to Kigyokan Knakei.” (Parts Transaction and Inter-Organizational Relationship) in Uekusa (ed.) Nihon no Sangyo Soshiki (Japanese Industrial Organization), Tokyo: Yuhikaku, 45–72. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, Takahiro and Takashi Matsuo (1993). “Note on the Findings of the Assembly Automation Study (Second Report) — A Survey of the Japanese Auto Makers” Paper presented at The International Conference on Assembly Automation and Future Outlook of Production Systems. Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan. November, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, Takahiro and Akira Takeishi (1993). “Jidosha Sangyo no Seisansei (Productivity of the Automobile Industry) ”. Soshiki Kagaku (Organizational Science), Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 36–43 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, Takahiro and Joseph Tidd (1993). “The UK and Japanese Auto Industry: Adoption and Adaptation of Fordism.” Paper Presented at the Conference on Entrepreneurial Activities and Enterprise Systems, University of Tokyo Research Institute for the Japanese Economy, Gotenba City, January 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Robert H, and Steven C. Wheelwright (1984). Restoring Our Competitive Edge. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helper, Susan (1990) “Competitive Supplier Relations in the U.S. and Japanese Auto Industries: An Exit/Voice Approach,” Business and Economics History, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helper, Susan (1991) “How much Has Really Changed between U.S. Automakers and Their Suppliers?” Sloan Management Review, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, Marco (1993). “Real-World R&D: Jumping the Product Generation Gap.” Harvard Business Review, May–June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itami, Hiroyuki and Tsuyoshi Numagami (1992) “Dynamic Interaction Between Strategy and Technology”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13, pp. 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaikumar, Ramchandran (1986). “Postindustrial Manufacturing.” Harvard Business Review, November December: pp. 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürgens, Ulrich, Knuth Dohse, and Thomas Malsch (1986). “New Production Concepts in West German Car Plants.” in Tolliday, Steven, and Jonathan Zeitlin (ed.) The Automobile Industry and Its Workers: Between Fordism and Flexibility: Polity Press: pp. 258–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krafcik, John (1988). “Triumph of the Lean Production System.” Sloan Management. Review, Fall: pp. 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumasaka, Hideyuki (1988). “Jidosha no Kumitate Gijutu no Genjo to Shorai” (Current Status and Future of assembly Techniques of Automobiles). Jidosha Gijutu (Automotive Technology), Vol. 42, No. 1: pp. 72–78 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Monden, Yasuhiro (1983). Toyota Production System. Atlanta: Institute of Industrial Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishiguchi, Toshihiro (1994). Strategic Industrial Sourcing: The Japanese Advantage, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sei, Shoichiro (1993). “Contradiction between Standardization and High Quality in Assembly Automation in the Japanese Auto-Industry.” Paper presented at The International Conference on Assembly Automation and Future Outlook of Production Systems. Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan. November, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimokawa, Koichi (1992). “Japanese Production System and the Factory Automation.” Discussion paper for the Berlin Workshop on Assembly Automation. November 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J., Gary Pisano and Amy Shuen (1992). “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.” Revised, June 1992. University of California at Berkeley Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, Joseph (1991). Flexible Manufacturing Technologies and Industrial Competitiveness. London: Pinter Publisher, von Hippel, Eric (1990) “Task partitioning: An innovation process variable”, Research Policy, vol. 19, pp. 407–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, Daniel E. (1986). “Real Robots Do Need Jigs.” Harvard Business Review, My-June: pp. 110–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, Daniel E. (1993). “Nippondenso Co. Ltd.: A Case Study of Strategic Product Design.” C.S. Draper Laboratory Working Paper, CADL-P 3225. Womack, James P., Daniel T. Jones, and Daniel Roos. The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Rawson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Hisanaga Amikura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Economics and Management, University Ca’ Foscari, San Trovaso 1075, 30123, Venice, Italy

    Anna Comacchio , Giuseppe Volpato  & Arnaldo Camuffo ,  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Amikura, H. (1999). Automation Strategies at the First-Tier Suppliers in Japan: Process Development and Product Trajectory. Hypothesis on the Supplier-Assembler Relationship. In: Comacchio, A., Volpato, G., Camuffo, A. (eds) Automation in Automotive Industries. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59864-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59864-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64157-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59864-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation