Advertisement

Monitoring the Continental Reference Frame in South America

  • Hermann Drewes
  • Klaus Kaniuth
  • Wolfgang Seemüller
  • Klaus Stuber
  • Herbert Tremel
  • José Napoléon Hernandez
  • Melvin Hoyer
  • Eugen Wildermann
  • Luiz Paulo Fortes
  • Katia Duarte Pereira
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 120)

Abstract

The South American Terrestrial Reference System (SIRGAS) is defined according to the IERS conventions. The reference frame is realized by a set of three-dimensional geocentric coordinates of about 60 stations derived from a continental GPS campaign in 1995 (epoch 1995.4). The time evolution of station coordinates is defined by the true station motions, in a linear approximation given by the station velocities. These velocities may either be determined from continuous monitoring or from repeated GPS campaigns. The actual continuous monitoring within the IGS Regional Network for South America includes 16 stations on the continent. The linear station velocities derived from two years of observations are presented. As an example of irregular deformations, results from repeated GPS campaigns in a boundary zone along the Caribbean and South American plates are shown. Linear station velocities are estimated as well as unsteady station motions as a consequence of an earthquake. The adequate consideration of these motions in a global geodetic observing system is an important issue.

Keywords

Terrestrial Reference Frame Recent Crustal Movement Caribbean Plate South American Plate IERS Convention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Angermann D., Klotz J., Michel G., Reigber Ch., Reinking J.: Großräumige GPS-Netze zur Bestimmung der Krustenkinematik in Zentralasien und Südamerika. DVW Schriftenreihe (28) 79–93, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. Drewes H.: Time evolution of the SIRGAS reference frame. Springer, IAG Symposia, No. 118, 174–179, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. Freymueller J.T., Kellogg J.N., Vega V.: Plate motions in the North Andes region. J. Geophys. Res. (98) 21853–21863, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Herring T.A.: MIT T2 Associate Analysis Center Report. IGS 1996 Annual Report, 255–267, IGS Central Bureau, JPL, Pasadena 1997.Google Scholar
  5. Hoyer M., Arciniegas S., Pereira K., Fagard H., Maturana R., Torchetti R., Drewes H., Kumar M., Seeber G.: The definition and realization of the reference System in the SIRGAS project. Springer, IAG Symposia, No. 118,167–173, 1998Google Scholar
  6. Kaniuth K., Drewes H., Stuber K., Tremel H., Moirano J.: Results of the SIRGAS 95 GPS network processing at DGFI/I. Springer, IAG Symposia, No. 118, 180–186, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. Kaniuth K., Drewes H., Stuber K., Tremel H., Hernandez N., Hoyer M., Wildermann E., Kahle H.-G., Straub C: Crustal deformation along the Caribbean — South American plate boundary derived from the CASA GPS project. Springer, IAG Symposia, No. 118, 417–422, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. Kellogg J.V., Vega V.: Tectonic development of Panama, Costa Rica and the Colombian Andes: Constraints from Global Positioning System geodetic studies and gravity. Geol. Soc. Am. Special Paper 295, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. Kendrick E.C., Bevis M., Smalley Jr. R.F., Cifuentes O., Galban F.: Current rates of convergence across the Central Andes: Estimates from continuous GPS observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. (26) 541–544, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leffler L., Stein S., Mao A., Dixon T., Ellis M. A., Ocola L., Sacks I.S.: Constraints on present-day shortening rate across the central eastern Andes from GPS data. Geophys. Res. Lett. (24) 1031–1034, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Norabuena E., Leffler-Griffin L., Mao A., Dixon T., Stein S., Sacks LS., Ocola L., Ellis M.: Space geodetic observations of Nazca-South America convergence across the Central Andes. Science (279) 358–362, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Reigber Ch., Xia Y., Michel G.W., Klotz J., Angermann D.: The Antofagasta 1995 earthquake: Crustal deformation pattern as observed by GPS and D-INSAR. Proc. 3rd ERS Symp. on Space at the Service of our environment (ESA SP-414) 507-513, 1997.Google Scholar
  13. Ruegg J.C., and 14 others: The M = 8.1 Antofagasta (North Chile) earthquake of July 30, 1995: First results from teleseismic and geodetic data. Geophys. Res. Lett. (23) 917–920, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Seemüller W., Drewes H.: The IGS regional associate analysis center for South America at DGFI/I. Springer, IAG Symposia, No. 118,211-215, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. Sirgas Final Report, Working Groups I and II. IBGE Rio de Janeiro 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hermann Drewes
    • 1
  • Klaus Kaniuth
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Seemüller
    • 1
  • Klaus Stuber
    • 1
  • Herbert Tremel
    • 1
  • José Napoléon Hernandez
    • 2
  • Melvin Hoyer
    • 3
  • Eugen Wildermann
    • 3
  • Luiz Paulo Fortes
    • 4
  • Katia Duarte Pereira
    • 4
  1. 1.Deutsches Geodätisches ForschungsinstitutMünchenGermany
  2. 2.Servicio Autónomo de Geografia y Cartografia NationalCaracasVenezuela
  3. 3.Escuela de Ingeniería Geodésica, Facultad de IngenieríaLUZMaracaibo / Edo. ZuliaVenezuela
  4. 4.Departamento de GeodesiaInstituto Brasileiro de Geografia e EstatisticaBrasil

Personalised recommendations