Abstract
The current structure and possible future modifications of the IAG were in the focus of the Section II meeting of IAG in October 1998 in Munich.
The main conclusion was, that the IAG should invoke a thorough review process within the next IAG “legislation period” from 1999–2003. This process should include at least one special retreat of the IAG Executive Committee with a well selected list of guests. It must involve all IAG sections and all other relevant IAG entities (like IAG services).
Section II is convinced that a thorough review process is necessary because
-
geodesy underwent a dramatic development since the creation of the current structure,
-
space geodesy became increasingly important in the same period: today, it plays a dominant role in all sections,
-
the current section structure does not seem to reflect the present-day situation in an adequate way
-
the IAG services (like IERS, IGS, etc.) play an increasingly important role also for research in geodesy and geodynamics but are not well (if at all) integrated in the current structure.
Section II is convinced that these facts fully justify a thorough reorganization. Section II is also convinced, however, that the entire spectrum of IAG must participate in this important process in order to converge to a satisfactory solution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beutler, G., H. Drewes, R. Rummel, Ch. Reigber (1999). Space Techniques and their Coordination within IAG at Present and in Future.In proceedings of 1998 IGGOS Symposium, in press.
Beutler, G . (1999). IAG Services in the Current Framework of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG). Inthis Volume.
Geodesist’s Handbook (1996). In Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 70, No. 12, pp. 839–1036.
Mueller II . (1996). The Commission: a Historical Note, in CSTG Bulletin, No. 12, pp. 7–20, Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut, Munich.
Mueller, II . (1998). Science Services: International Association of Geodesy (IAG)/Federation of Astronomical & Geophysical Services (FAGS). In Special Volume, IAG Scientific Assembly, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Sep 3–9, 1997,62 pages, available through IAG Central Bureau c/o Department of Geophysics, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rummel, R .(1998). Global Integrated Geodetic and Geodynamic Observing System (GIGGOS).In Proceedings of 1998 IGGOS Symposium, (in press).
Torge, W . (1996). The International Association of Geodesy (IAG) — More than 130 Years of International Cooperation. In the Geodesist’s Handbook, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 70, No. 12, pp. 840–845.
Willis, P . (ed.) (1995). Travaux de l’Association Internationale de Géodésie, Tome 30, Rapports Généraux et Rapports Techniques átblis á l’Occasion de la Vittgtiéme Assemblée Générale, ä Boulder, USA, Juillet 1995. Secrétariat de 1’Association, 140, rue de Grenelle, 75700 Paris, France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 SPringer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Beutler, G., Drewes, H., Rummel, R. (2000). Reflections on a new structure for IAG Beyond 2000 — conclusions from the IAG Section II Symposium in Munich. In: Schwarz, KP. (eds) Geodesy Beyond 2000. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 121. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59742-8_71
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59742-8_71
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64105-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59742-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive