Skip to main content

Magnetic Signatures of Pampean Soils, A Case Study

  • Chapter
Southern Hemisphere Paleo- and Neoclimates

Abstract

In several places in the world measurements of the magnetic susceptibility have been used to detect environmental changes. This study reassesses this problem with special emphasis on the validation of some general conclusions that are often found in the literature. This study links magnetic susceptibility measurements of Pampean soils with present environmental conditions. It could be shown that also in the Argentine Pampa, where such studies have just been started, susceptibility measurements can be used for paleoclimatic studies. In contrast to the results from the cold Chinese Loess plateau the calibration is however different.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beget JE, Hawkins DB (1989) Influence of orbital parameters on Pleistocene loess deposition in Central Alaska. Nature 337: 151–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beget JE, Stone DB, Hawkins DB (1990) Paleoclimatic forcing of magnetic susceptibility variations in Alaska loess during the late Quaternary. Geology 18:40–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloemendal J, deMenocal P (1989) Evidence for a change in the periodicity of tropical climate cycles at 2.4 Myr from whole-core magnetic susceptibility measurements. Nature 342:897–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIRN (1989) Mapa de suelos de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria. Proyecto PNUD ARG 85/019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing JA, Maher BA, Oldfield F(1985) Geomorphological linkages between soils and sediments: the role of magnetic measurements. In: Richards KS, Arnett RR, Ellis, S (eds)Geomorphology and Soils.George Allen and Unwin,pp 441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing J, Morton R, Price T, Foster I (1986) Tracing movements of topsoil by magneticmeasurements: two case studies. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 42:93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy J(1992) Past Global Changes (PAGES). Report 19. Global Change IGBP of ICSU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans ME, Heller F (1994) Magnetic enhancement and paleoclimate: study of a loess/palaeosol couplet across the loess plateau of China. Geophys. J. Int. 117:257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassbinder JW, Stanjek H, Vali H (1990) Occurrence of magnetic bacteria in soil. Nature 343:161–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller F, Liu Tungsheng (1986) Paleoclimatic and sedimentary history from magneticsusceptibility of loess in China. Geophysical Research Letters 13(11):1169–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller F , Meili B, Wang J, Huamei L, Liu Tungsheng (1987)Magnetization and Sedimentation History of Loess in the Central Loess Plateau of ChinaIn: Liu Tungsheng (ed) Aspects of Loess Research. China Ocean Press, pp 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton J (1987) A simple model for the interpretation of magnetic records in lacustrine and ocean sediments. Quaternary Research 27:160–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukla G, Heller F, Liu Xiu Ming, Xu Tong Chun, Liu Tungsheng, An Zhi Sheng (1988) Pleistocene climates in China dated by magnetic susceptibility. Geology 16:811–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukla G , An ZS, Melice JL, Gavin J, Xiao JL(1990) Magnetic susceptibility record of Chinese Loess. Trans, of the Royal Soc. of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 81:263–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Borgne E (1955) Susceptibilite magnetique anormale du sol superficiel. Ann. Geophys. 11:399–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Tungsheng(1985a) Loess and the environment.China Ocean Press Beijing: 1–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Tungsheng, An Zhisheng, Yuan Baoyon and Han Jiamao (1985b) The Loess-Paleosol Sequence in China and Climatic History. Episodes 8(1):21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher B (1986) Characterization of soils by mineral magnetic measurement. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 42:76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher B, Taylor R (1988) Formation of ultrafine-grained magnetite in soils. Nature 336:368–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher B, Thompson R (1991) Mineral magnetic record of Chinese loess and paleosols. Geology 19:3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäher BA, Thompson R (1992) Paleoclimatic significance of the mineral Magnetic Record of the Chines Loess and Paleosols. Quaternary Research 37:155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins C (1977) Magnetic susceptibility of the soil and its significance in Soil Science. Journal of Soil Science 28:223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabel P (1993) The Brunhes-Matuyama boundary in Pleistocene sediments of Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Quaternary International 17:79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabel P, Camilión C, Machado G, Spiegelman A, Mormeneo L (1993) Magneto y litoestratigrafia de los sedimentos pampeanos en los alrededores de las Ciudad de Baradero Prov. de Buenos Aires. Rev. de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 48(3–4): 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oades JM, Townsend WN (1963) The detection of ferromagnetic minerals in soils and clays. Journal of soil science 14:179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen N, von Dobeneck T, Vali H (1986) Fossil bacterial magnetite in deep-sea sediments from the South Atlantic Ocean. Nature 320:611–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen N, Weiss D, Vali H (1992) Magnetic bacteria in lake sediments. In: Lowes FJ, Collinson D, Parry J, Runcorn S, Tozer D, Soward A (eds) Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen N, Schmidbauer E, Strattner M, Schueler D (1993) On the occurrence of bacterial magnetite in limnic sediments and soil. Ann. Geophys.l l(Suppl. 1) C 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter NW, Chlachula J, Evans ME (1995)Magnetic susceptibility and remanence record of the kurtak loess, southern Siberia, Russia. In Terra Nostra.Abstracts XIII INQUA Congress, Berlin 3–10 August 1995, p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwertmann U, Taylor R (1977) Iron oxides. In: Minerals in soil environment. Soil. Sci. Soc.Am. 145–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring S, Amman R, Ludwig W, Schleifer K, van Gemerden H, Petersen N (1993) Dominating Role of an Unusual Magnetotactic Bacterium in the Microaerobic Zone of a Freshwater Sediment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59:2397–2403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R, Oldfield F (1986) Environmental Magnetism. Allen and Uwin, London, p. 219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vali H, Forster O, Amarantidis G, Petersen N (1987) Magnetotactic bacteria and their magnetofossils in sediments. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 86:389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Houten FB (1982) Ancient Soils and Ancient Climates. In: Climate in Earth History. Studies in Geophysics. National Academy Press. Washington D.C., pp 112–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verosub KL, Ensley RA, Ulrick JS (1979) The role of water content in the magnetization of sediments. Geophysical Research Letters. 6(4):226–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiuming L, Shaw J, Liu T, Heller F, Yuan B (1992) Magnetic mineralogy of Chinese loess and its significance. Geophys. J. Int. 108:301–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H, Oldfield F, Yu L, Shaw J, An Z (1991) The magnetic properties of particle-sized samples from the Luo Chuan loess section: evidence for pedogenesis. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 68:250–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou LP, Oldfield F, Wintle AG, Robinson SG, Wang JT (1990) Partly pedogenic origin of magnetic variations in Chinese loess. Nature 346, 737–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nabel, P., Petersen, N. (2000). Magnetic Signatures of Pampean Soils, A Case Study. In: Smolka, P., Volkheimer, W. (eds) Southern Hemisphere Paleo- and Neoclimates. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59694-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59694-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64089-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59694-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics