Abstract
The advantages of quasi-Monte Carlo methods diminish, mainly due to practical constraints, as the dimension of the problem grows. This phenomenon has been widely observed in several fields, especially in particle transport theory, and several methods have been proposed to provide remedies for the difficulties faced in high dimensional quasi-Monte Carlo simulation.
One of the methods that has been used successfully in various high dimensional problems will be presented. The advantages of this method will be illustrated when applied to selected problems from option pricing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. B. Owen,“Latin Supercube Sampling for Very High Dimensional Simulations”, ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, Vol. 8, No. 1, 71–102, 1998.
N. Bouleau and D. Lépingle,Numerical Methods For Stochastic Processes, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, 1994.
J. Spanier,“Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods for Particle Transport Problems”, Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing 1994, Lecture Notes in Statistics #106, Springer, 1995.
J. Spanier and L. Li, “Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods for Integral Equations”, Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 1996, Lecture Notes in Statistics #127, Springer, 1998.
G. Ökten, “A Probabilistic Result on the Discrepancy of a Hybrid-Monte Carlo Sequence and Applications”, Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 4, 255–270, 1996.
P. Bratley, B. L. Fox, “ALGORITHM 659: Implementing Sobol’s Quasirandom Sequence Generator”, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, Vol. 14, No. 1, 88–99, 1988.
B. L. Fox,“ALGORITHM 647: Implementation and Relative Efficiency of Quasirandom Sequence Generators”, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, Vol. 12, No. 4, 362–376, 1986.
P. Bratley, B. L. Fox and H. Niederreiter,“Implementation and Tests of Low- Discrepancy Sequences”, ACM Transactions on Modelling and Computer Simulation, 2, 195–213, 1992.
A. G. Z. Kemna and A. C. F. Vorst,“A Pricing Method for Options Based on Average Asset Values”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 14, 113–129, 1990.
S. J. Taylor,“Modeling Stochastic Volatility: A Review And Comparative Study”, Mathematical Finance, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1994.
H. Johnson and D. Shanno, “Option Pricing when the Variance is Changing”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1987.
G. Ökten,Contributions to the Theory of Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, Dissertation.Com, 1999 (www.dissertation.com/library/1120419a.htm www.dissertation.com/library/1120419a.htm).
G. Pages and Y. J. Xiao, “Sequences with low discrepancy and pseudo-random numbers: theoretical remarks and numerical tests”, J. Statist. Comput. Simul., Vol. 56, 163–188, 1997.
I. M. Sobol’, “Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models”, MMCE, Vol. 1, No. 4, 407–414, 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ökten, G. (2000). Applications of a Hybrid-Monte Carlo Sequence to Option Pricing. In: Niederreiter, H., Spanier, J. (eds) Monte-Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 1998. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59657-5_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59657-5_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66176-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59657-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive