Skip to main content

Higher-Dimensional Properties of Non-Uniform Pseudo-Random Variates

  • Conference paper
Monte-Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 1998

Abstract

In this paper we present the results of a first empirical investigation on how the quality of non-uniform variates is influenced by the underlying uniform RNG and the transformation method used. We use well known standard RNGs and transformation methods to the normal distribution as examples. We find that except for transformed density rejection methods, which do not seem to introduce any additional defects, the quality of the underlying uniform RNG can be both increased and decreased by transformations to non-uniform distributions.

address of correspondence

Research supported by the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF), project no. P11143-MAT

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afflerbach, L. and Hörmann, W. 1992. Nonuniform random numbers: A sensitivity analysis for transformation methods. In G. C. Pflug and U. Dieter Eds.,Lecture Notes in Econom. Math. Systems, Volume 374, pp. 135–144. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Afflerbach, L. and Wenzel, K. 1988. Normal random numbers lying on spirals and clubs.Statistical Papers 29, 237–244.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Box, G.E.P. and Muller M. E. 1958. A note on the generation of random normal deviates.Annals of Mathem. Stat. 29, 2, 610–611.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Deng, L. Y. and Chhikara, R. S. 1992. Robustness of some non-uniform random variate generators.Statistica Neerlandia 46, 2–3, 195–207.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Devroye, L . 1982. A note on approximations in random variate generation. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 14, 149–158.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Devroye, L. 1986.Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation. Springer- Verlag, New-York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Eichenauer, J. and Lehn, J. 1986. A non-linear congruential pseudo random number generator.Statistical Papers 27, 315–326.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Eichenauer-Herrmann, J. 1993. Statistical independence of a new class of inversive congruential pseudorandom numbers.Math. Comp. 60, 375–384.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Fishman, GS and Moore, LR 1986. An exhaustive analysis of multiplicative congruential random number generators with modulus 231-1.SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput 7, 24–45. see erratum, ibid. p. 1058

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Good, I. J. 1953. The serial test for sampling numbers and other tests for randomness.Proc. Cambridge Philosophical Society 49, 276–284.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hellekalek, P. and Leeb, H. 1997. Dyadic diaphony.Acta Arith. 80 187–196.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Herendi, T., Siegl, T., and Tichy, R. F. 1997. Fast Gaussian random number generation using linear transformations.Computing 59, 163–181.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hörmann, W. 1994a. A note on the quality of random variates generated by the ratio of uniforms method.ACM TOMACS 4, 1, 96–106.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hörmann, W. 1994b. The quality of non-uniform random numbers. In H. Dyckhoff, U. Derings, M. Salomon, and H. C. Tijms Eds.,Operations Re- search Proceedings 1993 (Berlin, 1994), pp. 329–335. Springer Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Hörmann, W. 1995. A rejection technique for sampling from T-concave dis- tributions.ACM Trans. Math. Software 21, 2, 182–193.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Hörmann, W. and Derflinger, G. 1990. The ACR method for generating normal random variables.OR Spektrum 12, 181–185.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hörmann, W. and Derflinger, G. 1993. A portable uniform random num- ber generator well suited for the rejection method.ACM Trans. Math. Software 19, 4, 489–495.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kinderman, A.J. and Monahan, F.J. 1977. Computer generation of random variables using the ratio of uniform deviates.ACM Trans. Math. Soft. 3, 3, 257–260.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kinderman, A. J. and Ramage, J. G. 1976. Computer generation of normal random variables.J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 71, 356, 893–898.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. L’Ecuyer, P. 1994. Uniform random number generation.Ann. Op. Re- search 53, 77–120.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. L’Ecuyer, P., Cordeau, J.-F., and Simand, R. 1998. Close-points spatial tests for random number generation, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leeb, H. and Hellekalek, P. 1998. Asymptotic properties of the spectral test, diaphony, and related quantities, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leeb, H. and Wegenkittl, S. 1997. Inversive and linear congruential pseu- dorandom number generators in empirical tests.ACM TOMACS 7, 2, 272–286.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Marsaglia, G. 1962. Improving the polar method for generating a pair of random variables. Technical Report Dl-82-0203, Boeing Sci. Res. Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marsaglia, G. 1985. A current view of random number generators. In L. Billard Ed.,Computer Science and Statistics: The Interface, pp. 3–10. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Matsumoto, M. and Kurita, Y. 1994. Twisted GFSR generators II.ACM TOMACS 4, 3, 254–266.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Monahan, F. 1985. Accuracy in random number generation.Math. Comp. 45, 172, 559–568.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Neave, H. R. 1973. On using the Box-Müller transformation with multiplicative congruential pseudo-random number generators.Appl. Statist. 22, 1, 92–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Niederreiter, H. 1992.Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods. SIAM, Philadelphia.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Park, S. K. and Miller, K. W. 1988. Random number generators: good ones are hard to find.Comm. ACM 31, 1192–1201.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Schmidt, B . 1996. Simplex II, Referenzhandbuch, Version 2.6. Universität Passau.http://www.uni-passau.de/~simplex/

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zinterhof, P. 1976. Über einige Abschätzungen bei der Approximation von Funktionen mit Gleichverteilungsmethoden.Sitzungsber. Österr. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Natur. KL II 185, 121–132.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leydold, J., Leeb, H., Hörmann, W. (2000). Higher-Dimensional Properties of Non-Uniform Pseudo-Random Variates. In: Niederreiter, H., Spanier, J. (eds) Monte-Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 1998. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59657-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59657-5_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66176-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59657-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics