Advertisement

Normal fault growth: Evolution of tipline shapes and slip distribution

Chapter

Abstract

Descriptions of the 3D geometry of ancient faults suggest that single, continuous normal faults have approximately elliptical tipline shapes, with (sub)horizontal major axes. However, many examples of normal faults are not continuous, but consist of distinct, overstepping segments. Individual segments may have complex shapes as well as a vertical height that exceeds the horizontal length. Where fault segments step laterally, their tiplines are relatively straight and steeply plunging. Tiplines in relays between vertically stepping normal fault segments are also relatively straight, but have a (sub)horizontal attitude. The fault shapes appear strongly related to the presence of neighboring faults and the positions of the fault segments relative to one another.

We evaluate these observations with quasi-static 3D boundary element models consisting of two frictionless, circular normal faults in a homogeneous, linearly-elastic medium, subjected to a uniform dip-slip stress drop. The local slip gradient at the fault tipline is used to calculate the propagation tendency. Mechanical interaction enhances fault propagation at levels where the faults underlap, but impede it where they overlap. For laterally echelon segments, the overlapped portion of the tipline is likely to become straighter, and approach parallelism with the slip vector. Such straight tiplines promote linkage of segments along a continuous line rather than at one or a few points. Also, the slip-parallel, steeply plunging attitude of the line of linkage tends to minimize kinematic constraints during simultaneous slip of adjacent segments. For vertically overlapping segments, horizontal relays are predicted. These relays are perpendicular to the slip vector and thus have a limited preservation potential.

These results suggest that normal faults may consist of a patchwork of segments, linked along lines parallel and perpendicular to the overall slip vector. Each segment in turn is likely to exist of a patchwork of smaller segments. Analysis of the propagation tendency suggests that the envelope of this whole patchwork of linked segments tends to re-establish a smooth elliptical tipline and a smooth distribution of total slip.

Keywords

Stress Intensity Factor Normal Fault Energy Release Rate Propagation Tendency Fault Segment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aki, K., Characterization of barriers on an earthquake fault, J. Geophys. Res, 84, 6140–6148, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, D.J., A Stochastic Fault model: 1. Static case, J. geophys. Res., 85, 3867–3877, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aydin, A., and A.M. Johnson, Analysis of faulting in porous sandstones, J. Struct. Geol., 5, 19–31, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aydin, A., and A. Nur, Evolution of pull-apart basins and their scale independence, Tectonics, 1, 91–105, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aydin, A., and R.A. Schultz, Effect of mechanical interaction on the development of strike-slip faults with echelon patterns, J. Struct. Geol., 12, 123–129, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barenblatt, G.I., Mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture, Adv. Appl. Mech., 7, 55–129, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett, J.M., J. Mortimer, J. Rippon, J.J. Walsh, and J. Watterson, Displacement geometry in the volume containing a single normal fault, Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 71, 925–937, 1987.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, A.A., The boundary element method in engineering, 337 pp., McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1992.Google Scholar
  9. Bouvier, J.D., C.H. Kaars-Sijpesteijn, D.F. Kluesner, C.C. Onyejekwe, and R.C. Van Der Pal, Three-Dimensional Seismic Interpretation and Fault Sealing investigations, Nun River Field, Nigeria, Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 73, 1397–1414, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. Bürgmann, R., D.D. Pollard, and S.J. Martel, Slip distributions on faults: effects of stress gradients, inelastic deformation, heterogeneous host-rock stiffness, and fault interaction, J. Struct. Geol, 16, 1675–1690, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Childs, C, S.J. Easton, B.C. Vendeville, M.P.A. Jackson, S.T. Lin, J.J. Walsh, J. Watterson, Kinematic analysis of faults in a physical model of growth faulting above a viscous salt analogue, Tectonophysics, 228, 313–329, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Childs, D., J. Watterson, and J.J. Walsh, Fault overlap zones within developing normal fault systems, J. Geol. Soc. Lond., 152, 535–549, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Comninou, M.A., J. Dunders, The angular dislocation in a half-space, J. Elasticity, 5, 203–216, 1975. Cottrell, B., and J.R. Rice, Slightly curved or kinked cracks, Int. J. Fract., 16, 155–169, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowie, P.A., and C.H. Scholz, Physical explanation for the displacement-length relationship of faults, using a post-yield fracture mechanics model, J. Struct. Geol., 14, 1133–1148, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cox, S.J.D., and C.H. Scholz, On the formation and growth of faults: an experimental study, J. Struct. Geol., 10, 413–430, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crouch, S.L., A.M. Starheid, Boundary element methods in solid mechanics, 322 pp., George Allen & Unwin Ltc, London, 1983.Google Scholar
  17. Cruikshank, K.M., G. Zhao, and A.M. Johnson, Duplex structures connecting fault segments in Entrada Sandstone, J. Struct. Geol., 13, 1185–1196, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Das, S., and K. Aki, Fault Plane with barriers: a versatile earthquake model, J. geophys. Res., 82, 5658–5670, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davy, P., On the frequency-length distribution of the San Andreas Fault system, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 12141–12151, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dawers, N.H., and M.H. Anders, Displacement-length scaling and fault linkage, J. Struct. Geol., 17 (5), 607–614, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Du, Y., and A. Aydin, The maximum distortional strain energy density criterion for shear fracture propagation with applications to the growth paths of en echelon faults, Geophys. Res. Let., 20, 1091–1094, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Du, Y., and A. Aydin, Shear fracture patterns and connectivity at geometric complexities along strike-slip faults, J. geophys. Res., 100, 18093–18102, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dugdale, D.S., Yielding of steel sheets containing slits, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 8, 100–104, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gay, N.C., and W.D. Ortlepp, Anatomy of a mining-induced fault zone, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 90, 47–58, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gillespie, P.A., J.J. Walsh, and J. Watterson, Limitations of dimension and displacement data from single faults and the consequences for data analysis and interpretation, J. Struct. Geol., 14, 1157–1172, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ida, Y., Cohsive force across the tip of longitudinal shear crack and Griffith’s specific surface energy, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 3796–3805, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Irwin, G.R., Analyses of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate, J. Appl. Mech., 24, 361–364, 1957.Google Scholar
  28. Jev, B.I., C.H. Kaars-Sijpesteijn, M.P.A.M. Peters, N.L. Watts, & J.T. Wilkie, Akaso Field, Nigeria: Use of integrated 3-D seismic, fault slicing, clay smearing, & RFT-pressure data on fault trapping & dynamic leakage, Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 77, 1389–1404, 1993. Jeyakumaran, M.,Google Scholar
  29. J.W. Rudnicki, and L.M. Keer, Modeling slip zones with triangular dislocation elements, Seis. Soc. Am. Bull., 82, 2153–2169, 1992.Google Scholar
  30. Kanamori, H., The nature of seismicity patterns before large earthquakes., in Earth-quake prediction: an international review, edited by D. Simpson, Richards, AGU Maurice Ewing Series, 1981.Google Scholar
  31. Kronberg, P., Geometries of extensional fault systems, observed and mapped on aerial and satellite photographs of Central Afar, (Ethiopia/Djibouti), Geologie en Mijnbouw, 70, 145–161, 1991.Google Scholar
  32. Larsen, P.H., Relay structures in a Lower Permian basement-involved extension system, East Greenland, J. Struct. Geol., 10, 3–8, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lawn, B.R., and T.R. Wilshaw, Fracture of Brittle Solids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1975.Google Scholar
  34. Li, V.C., Mechanics of shear rupture, in Fracture mechanics of rocks, edited by B.K. Atkinson, pp. 351–428, Academic Press, London, 1987.Google Scholar
  35. Mandl, G., Discontinuous fault zones, J. Struct. Geol., 9, 105–110, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mandl, G., Mechanics of Tectonic Faulting: Models & Basic Concepts, 407 pp., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
  37. Mansfield, C.S., and J.A. Cartwright, High resolution fault displacement mapping from 3-D seismic data: evidence for dip-linkage during fault growth, J. Struct. Geol., 18, 249–263, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McGarr, A., D.D. Pollard, N.C. Gay, & W.D. Ortlepp, Observations & analysis of structures in exhumed mine-induced faults, in Conference VIII: Analysis of actual fault zones in Bedrock., pp. 101–120, USGS, Menlo Park, California, 1979.Google Scholar
  39. Moore, D.E., and D.A. Lockner, The role of microcracking in shear-fracture propagation in granite, J. Struct. Geol, 17, 95–114, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morley, C.K., R.A. Nelson, T.L. Patton, and S.G. Munn, Transfer zones in the East African rift system and their relevance to hycrocarbon exploration in rifts, Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 74, 1234–1253, 1990.Google Scholar
  41. Muraoka, H., and H. Kamata, Displacement distribution along minor fault traces, J. Struct. Geol, 5, 483–495, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nicol, A., J.J. Walsh, J. Watterson, and P.G. Bretan, Three-dimensional geometry and growth of conjugate normal faults, J. Struct. Geol., 17 (6), 847–862, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nicol, A., J. Watterson, J.J. Walsh, and C. Childs, The shapes, major axis orientations and displacement patterns of fault surfaces, J. Struct. Geol., 18, 235–248, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Olson, J., Fracture Mechanics analysis of joints and veins, PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1991.Google Scholar
  45. Olson, J.E., D.D. Pollard, Inferring stress states from detailed joint geometry, in Key questions in Rock Mechanics, edited by P.A. Cundall, R.L. Sterling, A.M. Starheid, pp. 159–167, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
  46. Olson, J.E., and D.D. Pollard, The initiation and growth of en echelon veins, J. Struct. Geol., 13, 595–608, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Palmer, A.C., and J.R. Rice, The growth of slip surfaces in the progressive failure of overconsolidated clay, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., A332, 527–548, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Paris, P.C., G.C. Sih, Stress analysis of cracks, in Fracture Toughness Testing, pp. 30–83, American Society for Testing Materials, Special Technical Publication, 1965.Google Scholar
  49. Peacock, D.C.P., Displacement & segment linkage in strike-slip fault zones, J. Struct. Geol., 13, 1025–1035, 1991. Peacock, D.C.P., D.J. Sanderson, Displacements, segment linkage and relay ramps in normal fault zones, J. Struct. Geol., 13, 721–733, 1991.Google Scholar
  50. Peacock, D.C.P., and D.J. Sanderson, Displacements, segment linkage and relay ramps in normal fault zones, J. Struct. Geol., 13, 721–733, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peacock, D.C.P., and D.J. Sanderson, Geometry and development of relay ramps in normal fault systems, Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 78, 147–165, 1994.Google Scholar
  52. Peacock, D.C.P., and D.J. Sanderson, Strike-slip relay ramps, J. Struct. Geol., 17, 1351–1360, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Peng, S., and A.M. Johnson, Crack growth and faulting in cylindrical specimens of Chelmsford granite, Int. J. Rock Mech. and Mining Sci., 9, 37–86, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Petit, J.P., and M. Barquins, Can natural faults propagate under mode-II conditions?, Tectonics, 7, 1243–1256, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pollard, D.D., and A. Aydin, Propagation and linkage of oceanic ridge segments, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 10017–10028, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pollard, D.D., S.D. Saltzer, and A.M. Rubin, Stress inversion methods; are they based on faulty assumptions?, J. Struct. Geol., 15, 1045–1054, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pollard, D.D., P. Segall, Theoretical displacements and stresses near fractures in rock: with applications to faults, joints, veins, dikes, and solution surfaces, inFracture mechanics of rocks, edited by B.K. Atkinson, Academic Press, London, 1987.Google Scholar
  58. Pollard, D.D., P. Segall, and P. Delaney, Formation and interpretation of dilatant echelon cracks, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 93, 1291–1303, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rice, J.R., Mathematical analysis in the mechanics of fracture, in Fracture: An advanced treatise, edited by H. Liebowitz, pp. 191–311, Academic Press, San Diego, 1968.Google Scholar
  60. Rice, J.R., Theory of precursory processes in the inception of earthquake rupture, Gerlands Beitrage Geophys., 88, 91–127, 1979.Google Scholar
  61. Rippon, J.H., Contoured patterns of throw and hade of normal faults in the coalmeasures (Westphalian) of northeast Derbyshire, Proc. Yorks. Geol. Soc, 45, 147–161, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rudnicki, J.W., Fracture mechanics applied to the earth’s crust, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 8, 489–525, 1980. Segall, P., D.D.Google Scholar
  63. Pollard, Mechanics of discontinuous faults, J. Geophys. Res., 85 (B8), 4337–4350, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Segall, P., and D.D. Pollard, Nucleation and growth of strike slip faults in granite, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 555–568, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shen, B., O. Stephansson, H.H. Einstein, B. Ghahreman, Coalescence of fractures under shear stresses in experiments, J. Geophys. Res., 100 (B4), 5975–5990, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sih, G.C., Three Dimensional Crack Problems, 452 pp., Noordhoff International, Leiden, 1975.Google Scholar
  67. Sneddon, I.N., The distribution of stress in the neighbourhood of a crack in an elastic solid, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Section A, 187, 229–260, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tada, H., P.C. Paris, and G.R. Irwin, The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, Paris Productions Incorporated (and Del Research Corporation), St. Louis, 1985.Google Scholar
  69. Thomas, A.L., Poly3D: a three-dimensional, polygonal element, displacement discontinuity boundary element computer program with applications to fractures, faults, and cavities in the Earth’s crust, MSc thesis, Stanford University, 1993.Google Scholar
  70. Thomas, A.L., and D.D. Pollard, The geometry of echelon fractures in rock: implications from laboratory and numerical experiments, J. Struct. Geol., 15, 323–334, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Walsh, J.J., and J. Watterson, Analysis of the relationship bewteen displacements and dimensions of faults, J. Struct. Geol., 10, 239–247, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Walsh, J.J., and J. Watterson, Displacement gradients of fault surfaces, J. Struct. Geol., 11 (3), 307–316, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Walsh, J.J., J. Watterson, Geometric and kinematic coherence & scale effects in normal fault systems, in The Geometry of Normal Faults, edited by A.M. Roberts, G. Yielding, B. Freeman, pp. 193–203, Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ., 1991.Google Scholar
  74. Willemse, E.J.M., Segmented normal faults: correspondence between three-dimensionalmechanical models and field data, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 675–692, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Willemse, E.J.M., D.D. Pollard, and A. Aydin, 3D analysis of slip distributions along echelon normal fault arrays with consequences for fault scaling, J. Struct. Geol., 18, 295–309, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Williams, M.L. , On the stress distribution at the base of a stationary crack, J. Appl. Mech., 24 (109–114), 1957.Google Scholar
  77. Wong, T.F., On the normal stress dependency of the shear fracture energy, in Earthquake source mechanics, edited by S. Das, J. Boatwright, C.H. Scholz, pp. 1–12, AGU, Washingon, D.C., 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rock Fracture Project, Department of Geological and Environmental SciencesStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Shell International Exploration & ProductionEPT-SGRijswijkThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations