Skip to main content

Risk Analysis in Esophageal Surgery

  • Conference paper
Esophageal Carcinoma

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 155))

Abstract

The postoperative mortality after esophagectomy still remains a major factor influencing the prognosis of esophageal cancer and largely depends on the patient’s preoperative physiological status.

A composite scoring system was developed to predict the risk of esophagectomy, based on quantitative assessment of preoperatively available physiological parameters. The scoring system was reviewed retrospectively on operated patients and evaluated prospectively in two subsequent patient groups.

An initial retrospective multivariate analysis of 432 esophagectomy patients identified a compromised general status (p = 0.001) and poor cardiac (p<0.001), hepatic (p<0.05), and respiratory (p<0.05) functions as independent predictors of a fatal postoperative course. Based on the relative risks associated with individual impaired organ functions — general status 3.6, cardiac function 2.8, hepatic function 2.1, pulmonary function 1.7 — a composite risk score was established. A prospective study in 121 patients confirmed that this composite scoring system provides better identification of high-risk patients than does any of the individual parameters alone. Including this composite score into the process of patient selection and choice of procedure resulted in a decrease of postoperative mortality from 9.4% (52/553) to 1.2% (4/323) (p=0.001).

The risk of death after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer can be objectively assessed prior to surgery and quantified by a composite risk score. This score provides a useful tool in refining the criteria of patient selection for resection and choice of procedure, and markedly reduces postoperative mortality when applied prospectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Müller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M, Zieren U, Pichlmaier H (1990) Surgical therapy of esophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 77: 845–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Law SYK, Fok M, Wong J (1994) Risk analysis in resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. World J Surg 18: 339–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lund O, Kimose HH, Aagaard MT, Hasenkam JM, Erlandsen M (1990) Risk stratification and long-term results after surgical treatment of carcinomas of the thoracic oesophagus and cardia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 99: 200–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartels H, Stein HJ, Schömig A, Siewert JR (1997) Risikoerfassung. Chirurg 68: 654–661

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartels H, Stein HJ, Schömig A, Siewert JR (1997) Risikoerfassung. Chirurg 68: 654–661

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bumm R, Panel of experts (1996) Staging and risk analysis in esophageal carcinoma. Results of a consensus conference. Dis Esoph 9 [Suppl]: 20–29

    Google Scholar 

  7. Siewert JR, Bartels H, Bollschweiler E et al (1992) Plattenepithelcarcinom des Oesophagus. Behandlungskonzept der Chirurgischen Klinik der Technischen Universität München. Chirurg 63: 693–700

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Siewert JR, Hölscher AH, Bollschweiler E, Stein HJ, Fink U (1994) Chirurgie des Barrett-Carcinoms. Chirurg 66: 102–109

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dixon WJ (1988) BMDP statistical software manual. University of California Press, Berkeley CA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mathews HR, Powell DJ, McCarley CL (1986) Effect of surgical experience on results of resection for oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 63: 621–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsutsui S, Moriguchi S, Moritha M, Kuwano H, Matsuda H, Mori M, Matsuura H, Sugimachi K (1992) Multivariate analysis of postoperative complications after oesophageal resection. Ann N Thorac Surg 53: 1052–1056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Isono K, Onoda S, Ishikawa T, Sato H, Nahayama K (1982) Studies on the causes of deaths from oesophageal carcinoma. Cancer 49: 2173–2179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nishi M, Hiramatsu J, Hioki K, Hatano T, Yamamota M (1988) Pulmonary complications after subtotal oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 75: 527–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gill R, Goodman N, Golfus G (1983) Aminopyrine breath test predicts surgical risk for patients with liver disease. Ann Surg 198: 701–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fun S, Lau WY, Yip WC et al (1987) Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 74: 408–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Peracchia A, Bardini R, Ruol A et al (1988) Carcinoma of the oesophagus in the elderly: indications and results of surgery. Dis Esoph 1: 147–153

    Google Scholar 

  17. Karnofsky D (1984) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1: 634–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Siewert JR, Dittler H-J (1993) Oesophageal carcinoma: impact of staging on treatment. Endoscopy 25: 28–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dittler H-J, Siewert JR (1993) Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in esophageal cancer. Endoscopy 25: 156–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bartels, H., Stein, H.J., Siewert, J.R. (2000). Risk Analysis in Esophageal Surgery. In: Lange, J., Siewert, J.R. (eds) Esophageal Carcinoma. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 155. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59600-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59600-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64044-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59600-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics