Skip to main content

What’s New in Imaging?

New Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Esophageal Cancer Using an Endoluminal Surface Coil and Antibody-Coated Magnetite Particles

  • Conference paper
Esophageal Carcinoma

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 155))

Abstract

An endoluminal surface coil: Esophageal cancer was studied by high resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine the histopathologic basis for signal intensity in these lesions and to determine the potential of this modality for evaluating the depth of cancer invasion. In a basic study, 14 tumors were examined with a 1.5-T superconductive MR system using a surface coil. The esophageal wall could be differentiated into four layers on the T1-weighted images and seven layers on the T2-weighted images. The signal intensity of the tumor varied from low to intermediate on the T1- and T2-weighted images. The submucosal layer is important in evaluating cancer invasion on the T2-weighted images. In a clinical study, 30 patients with esophageal cancer were examined with a 1.5-T superconductive MR system using an endoluminal surface coil. In terms of depth of cancer invasion, the accuracy rate of MRI using the endoluminal surface coil was 83%. In conclusion, MRI with an endoluminal surface coil will be a useful examination for esophageal cancer in the future.

Antibody-coated magnetite particles: A highly specific and effective MRI contrast agent was prepared by coating superparamagnetite particles with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed against epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs), which are overexpressed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The agent was shown to have EGFR-specific MRI contrast capacity in vivo in athymic rats bearing TE8 or H69 tumors Immunospecific MRI using magnetite particles coated with MAbs against EGFR seems to be useful in the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Holscher AH, Dittler HJ, Siewert JR (1994) Staging of squamous esophageal cancer: accuracy and value. World J Surg 18: 312–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Imai Y, Kressel HY, Saul SH, Chao PH et al (1990) Colorectal tumors: an in vitro study of high-resolution MR imaging. Radiology 177: 695–701

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Japanese Society for Esophageal Disease. Guide lines for the clinical and pathologic studies on carcinoma of the esophagus, 8th edn

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schnall MD, Imai Y, Tomaszewski J et al (1991) Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. Radiology 178: 797–802

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Corn BW, Lanciano RM, Rosenblum N et al (1995) Improved treatment planning for the Syed-Neblett template using endorectal coil magnetic resonance and intraoperative (laparotomy/laparoscopy) guidance: a new integrated technique for hysterectomized women with vaginal tumors. Gynecol Oncol 56: 255–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozawa S, Ueda M, Ando N et al (1987) High incidence of EGF receptor hyperproduction in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer 39: 333–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozawa S, Ueda M, Ando N et al (1989) Prognostic significance of epidermal growth factor receptor in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer 63: 2169–2173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vogl TJ, Hammerstingl R, Schwarz W et al (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging of focal liver lesions. Comparison of the superparamagnetic iron oxide resovist versus gadolinium-DTPA in the same patient. Invest Radiol 31: 696–708

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cerdan S, Lotscher H, Kunnecke B et al (1989) Monoclonal antibody-coated magnetite particles as contrast agents in magnetic resonance of tumors. Magn Reson Med 12: 151–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weissleder R, Elizondo G, Wittenberg J et al (1990) Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide: characterization of a new class of contrast agents for MR imaging. Radiology 175: 489–493

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Renkin E, Curry F (1982) Endothelial permeability: pathways and modulations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 401: 248–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tiefenauer LX, Kuhne G, Andres RY (1993) Antibody magnetite nanoparticles: in vitro characterization of a potential tumor-specific contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Bioconjug Chem 4: 347–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Renshaw PF, Owen CS, Evans AE et al (1986) Immunospecific NMR contrast agents. Magn Reson Imaging 4: 351–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen B, Arai SF, Brain JD (1979) Smoking impairs long-term dust clearance from the lung. Science 204: 514–516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozawa S, Imai Y, Ando N et al (1996) High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of esophageal cancer using an endoluminal surface coil. In: Peracchia A et al (eds) Recent advances in diseases of the esophagus. Monduzzi, Bologna, pp 165–175

    Google Scholar 

  16. Suwa T, Ozawa S, Ueda M et al (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging of squamous cell carcinoma using magnetite particle coated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody. Int J Cancer 75: 626–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ozawa, S., Imai, Y., Suwa, T., Kitajima, M. (2000). What’s New in Imaging?. In: Lange, J., Siewert, J.R. (eds) Esophageal Carcinoma. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 155. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59600-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59600-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64044-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59600-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics