Skip to main content

Remote Sensing of Surface Properties. The Key to Land Degradation and Desertification Assessments

  • Conference paper
Sustainable Land Use in Deserts

Abstract

Since the International Convention on Desertification of the United Nations has come into force, the need to measure degradation processes in these areas has further increased. While standard methods for undertaking such measurements are imperfect or expensive, remote sensing with air- or space-borne sensor systems offers considerable potential. It provides a comprehensive spatial coverage, is intrinsically synoptic, collects objective, repetitive data and is thus ideally suited for monitoring environmentally sensitive areas. However, the relatively low spatial resolution provided by remote sensing satellites implies that one needs to exploit the spectral contrast between soil and vegetation and their intermediate states to develop surrogate measurements of degradation. Relationships between climate and environmental conditions, which may be of primary importance at a global scale, become problematic when local factors such as topography, lithology and soil properties determine the redistribution of water available for plant growth. Suitable remote sensing approaches must therefore concentrate on both, vegetation and soil-related assessments of ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams JB, Smith MO and Gillespie AR (1989) Simple models for complex natural surfaces: a strategy for the hyperspectral era of remote sensing. Proc IGARSS `89 Symp, July 10–14, Vancouver, Canada, pp 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Asrar G (ed) (1989) Theory and applications of optical remote sensing. Wiley Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baret F and Jacquemoud S (1994) Modeling canopy spectral properties to retrieve biophysical and biochemical characteristics. In: Hill J and Mégier J (eds) Imaging spectrometry — a tool for environmental observations. EUROCOURSES: remote sensing, vol 4. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 145–167

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Craig MD (1994) Minimum-volume transforms for remotely sensed data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 32: 542–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elachi C (1987) Introduction to the physics and techniques of remote sensing. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elvidge CD (1990) Visible and near infrared reflectance characteristics of dry plant materials. Int J Remote Sens 11: 1775–1795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escadafal R, Belgith A and Ben Moussa A (1994) Indices spectraux pour la télédétéction de la dégradation des milieux naturels en Tunisie aride. Proc 6th Int Symp on Physical Measurements and Signatures in Remote Sensing, 17–24 January 1994, Val d’Isere, France, ESA Publ, pp 253–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Graetz RD (1990) Remote sensing of terrestrial ecosystem structure: an ecologist’s pragmatic view. In: Hobbs RJ and Mooney HA (eds) Remote sensing of biosphere functioning. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 5–30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graetz RD (1996) Empirical and practical approaches to land surface charaterization and change detection. In: Hill J, Peter D (eds) The use of remote sensing for land degradation and desertification monitoring in the Mediterranean basin. State of the art and future research. EUR 16732 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 9–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Graetz RD and Gentle MR (1982) The relationships between reflectance in the Landsat wavebands and the composition of an Australian semi-arid shrub rangeland. Photogramm Engin Remote Sens 48: 1721–1730

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill J and Peter D (eds) (1996) The use of remote sensing for land degradation and desertification monitoring in the Mediterranean Basin. State of the art and future research, EUR 16732 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill J and Schutt B (2000) The use of earth observation satellites for mapping complex patterns of erosion and stability in dry Mediterranean ecosystems. Remote Sens Environ (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill J, Mégier J and Mehl W (1995) Land degradation, soil erosion and desertification monitoring in Mediterranean ecosystems. Remote Sens Rev 12: 107–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill J, Hostert P, Tsiourlis G, Kasapidis P and Udelhoven T (1998a) Monitoring 20 years of intense grazing impact on the Greek island of Crete with earth observation satellites. J Arid Environ 39: 165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill J, Udelhoven T, Schtitt B and Yair A (1998b) Differentiating biological soil crusts in a sandy arid ecosystem based on hyperspectral data acquired with DAIS-7915. In: Schaepman M, Schläpfer D and Itten K (eds) Proc 1st EARSeL Workshop on Imaging Spectrometry, RSL, University of Zurich, Switzerland, 6–8 Oct. 1998, EARSeL, Paris, pp 427–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon R and Danin A (1997) Floristic variation in Israel: a GIS analysis. Flora 192: 341–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer HJ (1996) Observation of the earth and its environment: survey of missions and sensors. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand TM and Kiefer RW (1987) Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainguet M (1994) Desertification, natural background and human mismanagement, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainguet M (1999) Aridity. Droughts and human development. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pech RP, Davis AW and Graetz RD (1986) Reflectance modelling and the derivation of vegetation indices for an Australian semi-arid shrubland. Int J Remote Sens 7: 389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Trejo F (1994) Desertification and land degradation in the European Mediterranean, EUR 14850 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickup G and Chewings VH (1988) Forecasting patterns of soil erosion in arid lands from Landsat MSS data. Int J Remote Sens 9, 1: 69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinty B, Verstraete M, Gobron N and Iaquinta J (1996) Advanced modelling and inversion techniques for the quantitative characterisation of desertification. In: Hill J and Peter D (eds) The use of remote sensing for land degradation and desertification monitoring in the Mediterranean basin. State of the art and future research. EUR 16732 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 169–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards JA (1993) Remote sensing digital image analysis — an introduction. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott JR (1996) Remote sensing: the image chain approach. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schowengerdt RA (1997) Remote sensing. Models and methods for image processing. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegal BS and Goetz AFH (1977) Effect of vegetation on rock and soil type discrimination. Photogramm Engin Remote Sens 43: 191–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MO, Ustin SL, Adams JB, Gillespie AR (1990) Vegetation in deserts I: a regional measure of abundance from multispectral images. Remote Sens Environ 32: 1–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabarant F (1999) Apport de la télédétéction et de la modélisation à l’etude de la dynamique de production d’un écosysteme méditerranéen de chêne vert (Quercus ilex) dans le sud de la France. Laboratoire d’Ecologie Vegetale, Universite Orsay, Paris Sud

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DSG and Middleton NJ (1994) Desertification. Exploding the myth. John Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Yair A (1994) The ambiguous impact of climate change at the desert fringe: Northern Negev, Israel. In Millington AC and Pye K (eds) Environmental change in drylands: biogeographical and geomorphological perspectives. John Wiley, Chichester, pp 199–227

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hill, J. (2001). Remote Sensing of Surface Properties. The Key to Land Degradation and Desertification Assessments. In: Breckle, SW., Veste, M., Wucherer, W. (eds) Sustainable Land Use in Deserts. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59560-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59560-8_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64027-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59560-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics