Skip to main content

Halophytes: Structure and Adaptation

  • Conference paper

Abstract

Halophytes are an ancient ecological type the origin of which is connected with the zone littoralis.A Saline environment of their habitat has a positive effect on them, as it reduces competition, prevents diseases and vermin and creates humidity at the expense of accumulation of moisture by salt. The negative qualities of this habitat are the high osmotic pressure of the soil solution and the toxic effect of salt. The morphogenesis and structure of vegetative and generative organs of hyperhalophytes (Halocnemum strobilaceum, Salicornia europaea) and euhalophytes from Suaeda (S. arcuata, S. microsperma, S. prostrata) and from ephemers (Hymenolobus procumbens, Spergularia microspermoides) were studied in the Kyzylkum desert with chloride-sulphate salting of soil, showing the characteristics of plant development caused by the specific habitat. The fruits of halophytes are not sclerified. The pericarp is parenchymatous. The testa have two layers of cells. Their adaptations to extreme desert conditions, including salinization, are implemented at the expense of the submerged position of fruits in fleshy cortex, the presence of tannins and melanins in the testa and fat in the embryo, which makes it difficult for salt to penetrate. The assimilating organs of hyperhalophytes are the shoots with reduced leaves and chlorenchymatic non-Kranz cortex of stems. Euhalophytes have small cylindrical leaves with Kranz (Suaeda arcuata, S. microsperma) and non-Kranz structure (S. prostrata, Hymenolobus, Spergularia ). However, the main line of adaptation of halophytes in both group is the succulent strategy whereby moisture is preserved at the expense of abundant water-bearing cells with thin walls. The structure of stems and roots of the species studied is anomalous, polycambialous and sclerenchymatous, which guarantees protection of lateral meristems and their substitution when they are damaged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akzhigitova NI (1982) Galofilnaja rastitelnost Srednej Azii i eje indikacionnye svojstva. FAN Uz SSR,Tashkent, 192 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Butnik AA (1981) Karpologicheskaya kharakteristika predstaviteley sem. Chenopodiaceae Bot J 10. 66: 1433–1443

    Google Scholar 

  • Butnik AA, Japakova UN, Begbaeva GF (1997). Adaptivnye svojstva galofitov v ontogeneze ras-tenij. Probl Osvo Pustyn. 4: 61–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel PA, Shakhov AA (1945) Ekologicheskoe znachenie vodnogo rezhima nekotorykh gaiophitov. Bot Zh SSSR 4.30: 154–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen I (1936) Biologische pflanzentypen als Hilfmittel in der Vegetationsforschung. Dissertation Middl fra Skalling lab, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies RL, Rudmik T (1991) Growth, reproduction and resource allocation in halophytes. Aquat Bot 1–2. 39: 3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi AC (1937) Some salient points in the evolution Amarantaceae and Chenopodiaceae. Am J Bot 1.24: 3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi AC, Rao V (1986) Stomatal types in some halophytes from the Mediterranean coast. Indian Bot Soc 65: 525–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller BA (1927) 0 solerose (Salicornia herbacea) i ego otnoshenii k zasoleniyu. Priroda i selskoe khozyaistvo zasushlivykh pustynnykh oblastei SSSR. 1–2:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvedeva RG (1962) Materialy po anatomii triby Salicornieae Dum.Soobsch.1. Osobennosti stroeniya sarsazana Halocnemum strobilaceum.Izv. AN KazSSR: 81–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagolevskiy VYa, Tilba AI (1989) Ekologo-fiziologicheskiy i geograficheskiy analiz galofitov Sev. Kavkaza. Ekologiya. 4: 3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker 0 (1928) Das Halophytenproblem. Ergeb Biot 3: 265–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungar JA (1962) Influence of salinity of seed germination in succulent halophytes.Ecology 4 43: 763–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungar JA (1979) Seed dimorphism in Salicornia europaea L.Bot Gaz 1. 140: 102–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Waisel Y (1972) Biology of halophytes. Academic Press, New York, 396 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Butnik, A.A., Japakova, U.N., Begbaeva, G.F. (2001). Halophytes: Structure and Adaptation. In: Breckle, SW., Veste, M., Wucherer, W. (eds) Sustainable Land Use in Deserts. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59560-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59560-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64027-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59560-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics