Skip to main content

Revisionen II

  • Chapter
  • 54 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die periprothetische Infektion des Kniegelenkersatzes unterscheidet sich in Pathogenese und Krankheitsverlauf nicht von der anderer Kunstgelenke. Bakterien gelingt es, den Fremdkörper in seinem knöchernen Bett zu besiedeln und von dort ausgehend eine Infektionskrankheit zu verursachen, die nur in Ausnahmefällen ohne Entfernung der Gelenkprothese kurativ zu behandeln ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Boss JH, Shajrawi I, Mendes DG (1994) The nature of the bone-implant interface. The lessons learned from implant retrieval and analysis in man and experimental animal. Med Prog Technol 20:119–142

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brisou JF (1995) Biofilms — Methods of enzymatic release of micro organisms. CRC-Press, Boca Raton Buchholz HW (1973) Tiefe Infektionen nach alloplastischem Hüftgelenksersatz. Langenbeck’s Arch Chirurg 334:547–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz HW (1973) Tiefe Infektionen nach alloplastischem Hüftgelenksersatz. Langenbeck‘s Arch Chirurg 334:547—553

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke JF (1961) The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery 50:161–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman DL, King RN, Andrade LD (1974) The foreign body reaction: A chronic inflammatory response. J Biomed Mater Res 8:199–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49:711–745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duff GP, Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS (1996) Aspiration of the knee joint before revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 331:132–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francois P, Vaudaux P, Lew PD (1998) Role of plasma and extracellular matrix in the physiopathology of foreign body infections. Ann Vase Surg 12:34–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frommelt L (2000) Periprosthetic infection - Bacteria and the interface between prosthesis and bone. In: Learmonth ID (ed) Interface in total hip arthroplasty. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gristina AD (1987) Biomaterial-centered infection: Microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science 237:1588–1595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gristina AG (1994) Implant failure and the immuno-incompetent fibro-inflammatory zonf. Clin Orthop 298:106–118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill C, Flamant R, Mazas F, Evrark J (1981) Prophylactic cephazolin versus placebo in total hip replacement. Report from a multicentre double-blind randomised trial. Lancet 4:795–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josefson G, Kolmert L (1993) Prophylaxis with systemic antibiotics versus gentamicin bone cement in total hip arthro-plasty. A ten-years survey of 1,688 hips. Clin Orthop 292:210–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidwell OM (1988) Air, antibiotics and sepsis in replacement joints. J Hosp Inf II (Suppl C):18–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwank S, Rajacic Z, Zimmerli W, Baiser J (1998) Impact of bacterial biofilm formation on in vitro and in vivo activities of antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemotherap 42:895–898

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, O’Connell JX, Duncan CP (1999) Prospective analysis of preoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Jt Surg Am 81:672–682

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tattevin P, Cremieux AC, Pottier P, Hüten D, Carbon C (1999) Prosthetic joint infection: when can prosthesis salvage be considered? Clin Infect Dis 29:292–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winninger DA, Fass RJ, (1996) Antibiotic-impregnated cement and beads for orthopedic infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:2675–2679

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerli W, Lew PD, Waldvogel FA (1984) Pathogenesis of foreign body infection - Evidence for a local granulocyte defect. J Clin Invest 73:1191–1200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerli W (1995) Die Rolle der Antibiotika in der Behandlung der infizierten Gelenkprothese. Orthopäde 24:308–313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers DC, Dennis DA, Johanson NA, Pellegrini VD Jr (1997) Common complications of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 79-A(2):278–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrack RL, Wolfe MW (1997) Diagnosis of the infected total knee replacement, 355–370. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (eds) Revision total knee arthroplasty. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengston S, Knutson K, Lidgren L (1989) Treatment of infected knee arthroplasty. CORR 245:173–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson S, Knutson K (1991) The infected knee arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up of 357 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 4:301–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen DE, Rand JA (1994) Intramedullary arthrodesis of the knee after failed total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 76-A:870–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald RH Jr (1998) Medical and surgical management of the patient with an infected total knee arthroplasty. In: Lotke PA, Garino JP (eds) Revision total knee arthroplasty. Lippincott-Raven, New York, pp 371–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerster von G, Klüber D, Käbler U (1991) Mittel- bis langfristige Ergebnisse nach Behandlung von 118 periprothetischen Infektionen nach Kniegelenkersatz durch einzeitige Austauschoperation. Orthopäde 20:244–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Göksan SB, Freeman MAR (1992) One-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 74-Br:78–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold DA, Scott SC, Scott WN (1996) Soft tissue expansion prior to arthoplasty in the multiply-operated knee. J Arthropl 5:512–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldmann RT, Scuderi GR, Insall JN (1996) 2-stage reimplantation for infected total knee replacement. CORR 331:118–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Hak DJ, Liebermann JR, Finerman GAM (1995) Single plane and biplane external fixators for knee arthrodesis. CORR 316:134–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakki S, Harwood SJ, Morrissey MA, Camblin JG, Laven DL,Webster WB Jr (1997) Comparative study of monoclonal antibody scan in diagnosing orthopaedic infection. CORR 335:275–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen AD (1997) Management of the infected total knee arthroplasty. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (eds) Revision total knee arthroplasty. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 371–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Härle A (1991) Die Infektion bei Knieendoprothesen. Orthopäde 20:227–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselbach von C (1989) Klinik und Pharmakokinetik von Kollagen — Gentamicin als adjuvante Lokaltherapie knöcherner Infektionen. Unfallchirurg 92:459–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Insall JN, Thompson FM, Brause BD (1983) Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthropla¬sty. J Bone Jt Surg 65A:1087–1098

    Google Scholar 

  • Isiklar ZU, Landon GC, Tullos HS (1994) Amputation after failed total knee arthroplasty. CORR 299:173–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerosch J (1995) Möglichkeiten bei nicht prothesenerhaltenden Revisonseingriffen bei der infizierten Kniealloarthro- plastik. In: Jerosch J (Hrsg) Infektionen des Bewegungsapparates. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson K, Hovelius L, Lindstrand A, Lidgren L (1984) Arthrodesis after failed knee arthroplasty. A nationwide multicenter investigation of 91 cases. CORR 191:202–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn D, Schmolke S (1996) Arthrodesis after revision of knee prostheses. Orthopäde 25:153–157

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lonner JH, Desai P, Dicesare PE, Steiner G, Zuckerman JD (1996) The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 78-A:1553–1558

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariani BD, Martin DS, Levine MJ, Booth RE, Tuan RS (1996) Polymerase chain reaction detection of bacterial infection in total knee arthroplasty. CORR 331:11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masri BA, Duncan CP, Beauchamp CP (1997) The modified two-stage exchange arthroplasty in the treatment of the infected total knee replacement: The PROSTALAC system and other articulated spacers. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (eds) Revision total knee arthroplasty. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 394–424

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson EJ, Lewonowski K, Dorr LD: (1995) Use of an articulated PMMA spacer in the infected total knee arthropla-sty. J Arthropl 1: 87–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mont MA, Waldman B, Banerjee Ch, Pacheco IH, Hungerford DS (1997) Multiple irrigation, debridement, and retention of components in infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthopl 4:426–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahabedian MY, Orlando JC, Delanois RE, Mont MA, Hungerford DS (1998) Salvage procedures for complex soft tissue defects of the knee. CORR 356:119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazarian DG, Booth RE Jr (1999) Extensor mechanism allografts in total knee arthroplasty.CORR 367:123–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand JA, Bryan RS (1983) Reimplantation for the salvage of an infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 65-A:1081–1086

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar MR (1996) Brauchen wir die Blutsperre noch? Unfallchirurg 99:374–378

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Segawa H, Tsukayama DT, Kyle RF, Becker DA, Gustilo RB (1999) Infection after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 81-A(10):1434–1445

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DG, Ehde DM, Legro MW, Reiber GE, del Aquila M, Boone DA (1999) Phantom limb, residual limb, and back pain after lower extremity amputations. CORR 361:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlasak R, Gearen PF, Petty W (1995) Knee arthrodesis in the treatment of failed total knee replacement. CORR 321:138–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman BJ, Mont MA, Payman KR, Freiberg AA, Windsor RE, Sculco TP, Hungerford DS (1999) infected total knee arthroplasty treated with arthrodesis using a modular nail. CORR 367:230–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside LA (1994) Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. CORR 299:169–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor RE (1991) Management of Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection. Orthop Clin N Am 3:531–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerli W (1995) Die Rolle der Antibiotika in der Behandlung der infizierten Gelenkprothesen. Orthopäde 24:308–313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frommelt, L., Gehrke, T. (2001). Revisionen II. In: Praxis der Knieendoprothetik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59518-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59518-9_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64006-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59518-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics