Skip to main content

Stated Privacy Preferences versus Actual Behaviour in EC Environments: a Reality Check

  • Conference paper
e-Finance

Abstract

As electronic commerce environments become more and more interactive, privacy is a matter of increasing concern. Many surveys have investigated households' privacy attitudes and concerns, revealing a general desire among Internet users to protect their privacy. To complement these questionnaire'based studies, we conducted an experiment in which we compared self-reported privacy preferences of 171 participants with their actual disclosing behavior during an online shopping episode. Our results suggest that current approaches to protect online users' privacy, such as EU data protection regulation or P3P, may face difficulties to do so effectively. This is due to their underlying assumption that people are not only privacy conscious, but will also act accordingly. In our study, most individuals stated that privacy was important to them, with concern centering on the disclosure of different aspects of personal information. However, regardless of their specific privacy concerns, most participants did not live up to their self-reported privacy preferences. As participants were drawn into the sales dialogue with an anthropomorphic 3-D shopping bot, they answered a majority of questions, even if these were highly personal. Moreover, different privacy statements had no effect on the amount of information disclosed; in fact, the mentioning of EU regulation seemed to cause a feeling of ‵false security′'. The results suggest that people appreciate highly communicative EC environments and forget privacy concerns once they are ‘inside the Web ’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Backhaus, Klaus/Piltz, Klaus (1990), Strategische Allianzen - eine neue Form kooperativen Wettbewerbs?, in: Backhaus, Klaus/Piltz, Klaus [Hrsg.], ZfbF Sonderheft 27, S. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Backhaus, Klaus/Plinke, Wulff (1990), Strategische Allianzen als Antwort auf veranderte Wettbewerbsstrukturen, in: Backhaus, Klaus/Piltz, Klaus [Hrsg.], ZfbF Sonderheft 27, S. 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Badaracco, Joseph L. (1991), The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete Through Strategic Alliances, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berger, Allen N./Demsetz, Rebecca S./Strahan, Philip E. (1999), The Consolida¬tion of the Financial Services Industry: Causes, Consequences, and Implications for the Future, in: Journal of Banking & Finance 23, S. 135–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger, Allen N./DeYoung, Robert/Genay, Hesna/Udell, Gregory F. (2000), Globalization of Financial Institutions: Evidence from Cross-Border Banking Performance, in: Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, Bd. 3

    Google Scholar 

  6. Besen, Stanley M./Farrell, Joseph (1994), Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (2), S. 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Book, Thomas (2001), Strukturwandel und intemationaler Wettbewerb im Borsenwesen, unveroffentlichtes Manuskript, Justus-Liebig-Universitat Giessen.

    Google Scholar 

  8. BZ (06.11.1999), o. V., Wiener Borse halbiert mit Xetra die Gebuhren, in: BorsenZeitung, S. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, Kalman J./Conroy, Robert M./Maier, Steven F. (1985), Order Flow and the Quality of a Market, in: Amihud, Yakov/Ho, Thomas Y./Schwartz, Robert A. [Hrsg.], Market Making and the Changing Structure of the Securities Industry, Lexington, MA, S. 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen, Kalman J./Maier, Steven F./Schwartz, Robert A./Whitcomb, David K. (1982), An Analysis of the Economic Justification for Consolidation in a Secondary Security Market, in: Journal of Banking & Finance 6, S. 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Contractor, Farok J./Lorange, Peter (1988), Why Should Firms Cooperate? The Strategy and Economics Basis for Cooperative Ventures, in: Contractor, Farok J./Lorange, Peter [Hrsg.], Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexington, MA, S. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  12. DaTeOO, Das, T. K./Teng, Bing-Sheng (2000), A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances, in: Journal of Management 26, S. 31–61.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Di Noia, Carmine (1998), Competition and Integration among Stock Exchanges in Europe: Network Effects, Implicit Mergers and Remote Access, Financial Institutions Center [Hrsg.], Working Paper, 98–03.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Domowitz, Ian (1995), Electronic Derivatives Exchanges: Implicit Mergers, Network Externalities and Standardization, in: The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 35, S. 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Domowitz, Ian/Steil, Benn (1999), Automation, Trading Costs, and the Structure of the Securities Trading Industry, in: Litan, Robert E./Santomero, Anthony M. [Hrsg.], Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services 1999, Washington D. C., S. 33–81.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Economides, Nicholas (1993), Network Economics with Application to Finance, in: Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments 2 (5), S. 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edwards, Franklin R. (1981), The Regulation of Futures Markets: A Conceptual Framework, in: The Journal of Futures Markets 1 (Supplement), S. 417–439

    Google Scholar 

  18. Farrell, Joseph/Saloner, Garth (1986), Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation, in: American Economic Review 76, S. 940–955.

    Google Scholar 

  19. FAZ (01.10.1999), o. V., Fusion zur Eurex mit hohen Synergien, in: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, S. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gahl, Andreas (1991), Die Konzeption strategischer Allianzen, Berlin, zugl.: Munster, Univ., Diss., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. GeigOO, Geiger, Albert M. (2000), Konsolidierung der europaischen Borsenlandschaft am Beispiel der Eurex, SchloB Reichartshausen, European Business School, Diss.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gideon, Carolyn/Verma, Shashi Kant/Zeckhauser, Richard (1998), Mergers and Alliances as the Response to Contracting Challenges in Information Technology, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University [Hrsg.], Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gomber, Peter (2000), Elektronische Handelssysteme: Innovative Konzepte und Technologien im Wertpapierhandel, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gort, Michael (1969), An Economic Disturbance Theory of Mergers, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics 83, S. 624–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hamel, Gary (1991), Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning Within International Strategic Alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal 12 (Special Issue), S. 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hamilton, James L. (1979), Marketplace Fragmentation, Competition, and the Efficiency of the Stock Exchange, in: The Journal of Finance 34, S. 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harrigan, Kathryn Rudie (1985), Strategies for Joint Ventures, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Harvey, Michael G./Lusch, Robert F. (1995), A Systematic Assessment of Potential International Strategic Alliance Partners, in: International Business Review 4, S. 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Inkpen, Andrew (1998), Learning, Knowledge Acquisition, and Strategic Alli-ances, in: European Management Journal 16, S. 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kalenberg, Michael (1988), Starkung des Borsenplatzes Deutschland durch Bor- senzentralisierung, in: Zeitschrift fur das gesamte Kreditwesen, S. 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kaufer, Erich (1980), Industrieokonomik: Eine Einfuhrung in die Wettbewerbs- theorie, Munchen.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Knoppe, Marc (1997), Strategische Allianzen in der Kreditwirtschaft, Miin- chen/Wien, zugl.: Rostock, Univ., Diss., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kogut, Bruce (1988), Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, in: Strategic Management Journal 9, S. 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. W. Bessler, T. Book.

    Google Scholar 

  35. KUmpel, Siegfried/Hammen, Horst (2000), Zur Genehmigungsfahigkeit eines geplanten Borsenverbundes, in: Hammen, Horst/KUmpel, Siegfried/Schneider, Uwe H. [Hrsg.], Rechtliche Aspekte eines geplanten Verbundes zwischen der Frankfurter und der Londoner Wertpapierborse, Wertpapier-Mitteilungen, Sonderbeilage Nr. 3, S. 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lambe, C. Jay/Spekman, Robert E. (1997), Alliances, External Technology Acquisition, and Discontinuous Technological Change, in: Journal of Product Innovation Management 14, S. 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee, Ruben (1998), what is an Exchange? The Automation, Management and Regulation of Financial Markets, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Malkamaki, Markku (1999), Are there Economies of Scale in Stock Exchange Activities?, Bank of Finland Discussion Papers, 4/99.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Madhavan, Ananth (1995), Consolidation, Fragmentation, and the Disclosure of Trading Information, in: Review of Financial Studies 8, S. 579–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mclnish, Thomas H./Wood, Robert A (1996), Competition, Fragmentation and Market Quality, in: Lo, Andrew W. [Hrsg.], The Industrial Organization and Regulation of the Securities Industry, Chicago/London, S. 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mendelson, Haim (1987), Consolidation, Fragmentation, and Market Performance, in: Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, S. 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ohmae, Kenichi (1989), The Global Logic of Strategic Alliances, in: Harvard Business Review 67 (5), S. 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Porter, Michael E./Fuller, Mark B. (1989), Koalitionen und globale Strategien, in: Porter, Michael E. [Hrsg.], Globaler Wettbewerb: Strategien der neuen Internationali- sierung, Wiesbaden, S. 363–400.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Potthoff, Volker/Widmer, Michael (1999), Eurex als Modell einer grenzuber- schreitenden Derivateborse: Funktions- und Aufsichtsprobleme, in: Nobel, Peter [Hrsg.], Aktuelle Rechtsprobleme des Finanz- und Borsenplatzes Schweiz, Bern, S. 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schmidt, Hartmut (1970), Borsenorganisation zum Schutze der Anleger, Tubingen, zugl.: Saarbriicken, Univ. d. Saarlandes, Diss., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schmidt, Hartmut (1977), Vorteile und Nachteile eines integrierten Zirkulati- onsmarktes fiir Wertpapiere gegeniiber einem gespaltenen Effektenmarkt, Kommission der Europaischen Gemeinschaften [Hrsg.], Briissel.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schmidt, Hartmut (1988), Wertpapierborsen: Strukturprinzip, Organisation, Kassa- und Terminmarkte, Miinchen.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Schmidt, Hartmut (1992), Die Rolle der Regionalborsen am deutschen Kapital- markt heute und morgen, in: Kredit und Kapital 25, S. 110–134 (Teil I) und S. 233–258 (Teil II).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schwartz, Robert A. (1996), Equity Trading II: Integration, Fragmentation, and the Quality of Markets, in: Steil, Benn et al. [Hrsg.], The European Equity Markets: The State of the Union and the Agenda for the Millennium, London, S. 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sheremata, Willow A. (1997), Barriers to Innovation: A Monopoly, Network Externalities, and the Speed of Innovation, in: The Antitrust Bulletin 42, S. 937–972.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Stoll, Hans R. (1993), Organization of the Stock Market: Competition or Fragmentation, in: Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 5 (4), S. 89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. (05.05.2000), o. V., Deutsche Borse verschiebt ihren Borsengang bis 2001, in: vwd, S. 9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Spiekermann, S., Großklags, J., Berendt, B. (2001). Stated Privacy Preferences versus Actual Behaviour in EC Environments: a Reality Check. In: Buhl, H.U., Kreyer, N., Steck, W. (eds) e-Finance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59504-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59504-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64000-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59504-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics