Skip to main content

Hereditarily Optimal Realizations: Why are they Relevant in Phylogenetic Analysis, and how does one Compute them

  • Conference paper
Algebraic Combinatorics and Applications

Abstract

One of the main problems in phylogenetic analysis (where one is concerned with elucidating evolutionary patterns between present day species) is to find good approximations of genetic distances by weighted trees. As an aid to solving this problem, it might seem tempting to consider an optimal realization of the metric defined by the given distances — the guiding principle being that, in case the metric is tree-like, the optimal realization obtained will necessarily be that unique weighted tree that realizes this metric. Although optimal realizations of arbitrary distances are not generally trees, but rather weighted graphs, one could still hope to obtain an informative representation of the given metric, maybe even more informative than the best approximating tree. However, optimal realizations are not only difficult to compute, they may also be non-unique. In this note we focus on one possible way out of this dilemma: hereditarily optimal realizations. These are essentially unique, and can also be described in an explicit way. We define hereditarily optimal realizations, discuss some of their properties, and we indicate in particular why, due to recent results on the so-called T-construction of a metric space, it is a straight forward task to compute these realizations for a large class of phylogentically relevant metrics.

The author thanks the New Zealand Marsden Fund for its support.

The author thanks the Swedish Natural Science Research Council (NFR) for its support (grant# M12342-300).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Althöfer, I.: On optimal realizations of finite metric spaces by graphs, Discrete Comput. Geometry 3 (1988) 103–122

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandelt, H.-J., Dress, A.: A canonical decomposition theory for metrics on a finite set, Adv. in Math. 92 (1992) 47–105

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandelt H.-J., Dress, A.: Split decomposition: a new and useful approach to phylogenetic analysis of distance data, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1 (3) (1992b) 242–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandelt, H.-J., Forster, P., Sykes, B., Richards, M.: Mitochondrial portraits of human population using median networks, Genetics 141 (October 1995) 743–753

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barthélémy, J., Guenoche A.: Trees and Proximity Representations, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester New York Brisbane Toronto Singapore, 1991

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Buneman, P.: The recovery of trees from measures of dissimilarity, In F. Hodson, Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences, (pp.387–395), Edinburgh University Press, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chepoi, V., Fichet, B.: A note on circular decomposable metrics, Geometriae Dedicata 69 (3) (March 1998) 237–240

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Christopher, G., Farach, M., Trick, M.: The structure of circular decomposable metrics, Algorithms—ESA ’96 (Barcelona), Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., 1136, Springer, Berlin, (1996) 486–500

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dress, A.: Trees, tight extensions of metric spaces, and the cohomological dimension of certain groups: A note on combinatorial properties of metric spaces, Adv. in Math. 53 (1984) 321–402

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dress, A., Hendy, M., Huber, K., Moulton, V.: On the number of vertices and edges in the Buneman Graph, Ann. Combin. 1 (1997) 329–337

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dress, A., Huber, K., Moulton, V.: Some variations on a theme by Buneman, Ann. Combin. 1 (1997) 339–352

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dress, A., Huber, K.T., Moulton, V.: A Comparison between two distinct continuous models in projective cluster theory: The median and the tight-span construction, Ann. Combin. 2 (1998) 299–311

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Dress, A., Huber, K.T., Moulton, V.: An explicit computation of the infective hull of certain finite metric spaces in terms of their associated Buneman complex, Mid Sweden University Mathematics Department Report No. 6 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dress, A., Huber, K.T., Moulton, V.: Hereditarily optimal realizations of consistent metrics, in preparation

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dress, A., Huber, K.T., Koolen, J., Moulton, V.: Six points suffice: How to check for metric consistency, Mid Sweden University Mathematics Department Report No. 8 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dress, A., Huber, K.T., Lockhart, P., Moulton, V.: Lite Buneman networks: A technique for studying plant speciation, Mid Sweden University Mathematics Department Report No. 1 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dress, A., Huson, D.: Computing phylogenetic networks from split systems, submitted (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dress, A., Huson, D., Moulton, V.: Analyzing and visualizing distance data using SplitsTree, Discrete Applied Mathematics 71 (1996) 95–110

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Dress, A., Moulton, V., Terhalle, W.: T-theory: An Overview, Europ. J. Combinatorics 17 (1996) 161–175

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Hillis, D., Moritz, C., Barbara, K.: Phylogenetic Inference, In Molecular Systematics, D.M. Hillis, (pp.407–514), Sinauer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huson, D.: SplitsTree: a program for analyzing and visualizing evolutionary data, Bioinformatics 14 (1) (1998) 68–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Imrich, W., Simoes-Pereira, J., Zamfirescu, C.: On optimal emdeddings of metrics in graphs, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 36, No. 1, (1984) 1–15

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalmanson K.: Edgeconvex circuits and the travelling salesman problem, Canadian Jour. Math., 27 (1975) 1000–1010

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Zaretsky, K.: Reconstruction of a tree from the distances between its pendant vertices, Uspekhi Math. Nauk (Russian Mathematical Surveys) 20 (1965) 90–92 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dress, A., Huber, K.T., Moulton, V. (2001). Hereditarily Optimal Realizations: Why are they Relevant in Phylogenetic Analysis, and how does one Compute them. In: Betten, A., Kohnert, A., Laue, R., Wassermann, A. (eds) Algebraic Combinatorics and Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59448-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59448-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41110-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59448-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics