Skip to main content

50 Years of Bailey’s Lemma

  • Conference paper
Algebraic Combinatorics and Applications

Abstract

Half a century ago, The Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society published W. N. Bailey’s influential paper Identities of the Rogers-Ramanujan type [16]. The main result therein, which was inspired by Rogers’ second proof of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities [49] (and also [48,28,15]), is what is now known as Bailey’s lemma. To celebrate the occasion of the lemma’s fiftiest birthday we present a history of Bailey’s lemma in 5 chapters (or rather sections), covering (i) Bailey’s work, (ii) the Bailey chain (iii) the Bailey lattice (iv) the Bailey lemma in statistical mechanics, and (v) conjugate Bailey pairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. K. Agarwal, G. E. Andrews and D. M. Bressoud, The Bailey lattice, J. Ind. Math. Soc. 51 (1987), 57–73.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Ahn, S.-W. Chung and S.-H. H. Tye, New parafermion, SU(2) coset and N = 2 superconformal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 365 (1991), 191–240.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. E. Andrews, An analytic generalization of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities for odd moduli, Prod. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 71 (1974), 4082–4085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G. E. Andrews, Multiple series Rogers-Ramanujan type identities, Pacific J. Math. 114 (1984), 267–283.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. E. Andrews, q-Series: Their development and application in analysis, number theory, combinatorics, physics, and computer algebra, in CBMS Regional Conf. Ser. in Math. 66 (AMS, Providence, Rhode Island, 1985 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. E. Andrews, The fifth and seventh order mock theta functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 293 (1986), 113–134.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. G. E. Andrews, E⋎PHKA! num = △ + △ + △, J. Number Theory 23 (1986), 285–293.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. G. E. Andrews, Bailey chains and generalized Lambert series: I. four identities of Ramanujan, Illinois J. Math. 36 (1992), 251–274.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. E. Andrews, R. J. Baxter, D. M. Bressoud, W. H. Burge, P. J. Forrester and G. Viennot, Partitions with prescribed hook differences, Europ. J. Combinatorics 8 (1987), 341–350.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. G. E. Andrews, R. J. Baxter and P. J. Forrester, Eight-vertex SOS model and generalized Rogers-Ramanujan-type identities, J. Stat. Phys. 35 (1984), 193–266.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. G. E. Andrews and A. Berkovich, A trinomial analogue of Bailey’s lemma and N = 2 superconformal invariance, Commun. Math. Phys. 192 (1998), 245–260.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. G. E. Andrews, F. J. Dyson and D. Hickerson, Partitions and indefinite quadratic forms, Invent. Math. 91 (1988), 391–407.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. G. E. Andrews and D. Hickerson, Ramanujan’s “lost”notebook. VII. The sixth order mock theta functions, Adv. Math. 89 (1991), 60–105.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. G. E. Andrews, A. Schilling and S. O. Warnaar, An A 2 Bailey lemma and Rogers-Ramanujan-type identities, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1999), 677–702.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. W. N. Bailey, Some identities in combinatory analysis, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) 49 (1947), 421–435.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. W. N. Bailey, Identities of the Rogers-Ramanujan type, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) 50 (1949), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Berkovich, Fermionic counting of RSOS-states and Virasoro character formulas for the unitary minimal series M(v,v + 1). Exact results, Nucl. Phys. B 431 (1994), 315–348.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Berkovich and B. M. McCoy, Continued fractions and fermionic representations for characters of M(p,p) minimal models, Lett. Math. Phys. 37 (1996), 49–66.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Berkovich, B. M. McCoy and P. A. Pearce, The perturbations ∅ 2,1 and ∅ 1,5 of the minimal models M(p,p) and the trinomial analogue of Bailey’s lemma, Nucl. Phys. B 519 [FS] (1998), 597–625.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Berkovich, B. M. McCoy and A. Schilling, N = 2 supersymmetry and Bailey pairs, Physica A 228 (1996), 33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Berkovich, B. M. McCoy and A. Schilling, Rogers-Schur-Ramanujan type identities for the M(p,p) minimal models of conformal field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 191 (1998), 325–395.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Berkovich, B. M. McCoy, A. Schilling and S. O. Warnaar, Bailey flows and Bose-Fermi identities for the conformal coset models (A1(1))N × (A1(1))N /(A1(1))N + N, Nucl. Phys. B 499 [PM] (1997), 621–649.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. M. Bressoud, Some identities for terminating q-series, Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 89 (1981), 211–223.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. D. M. Bressoud, M. Ismail and D. Stanton, Change of base in Bailey pairs, preprint math.CO/9909053. To appear in The Ramanujan Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. H. Burge, Restricted partition pairs, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 63 (1993) 210–222.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Y.-S. Choi, Tenth order mock theta functions in Ramanujan’s lost notebook, Invent. Math. 136 (1999), 497–569.

    Google Scholar 

  27. F. J. Dyson, Three identities in combinatory analysis, J. London. Math. Soc. 18 (1943), 35–39.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. O. Foda, K. S. M. Lee and T. A. Welsh, A Burge tree of Virasoro-type polynomial identities, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 13 (1998) 4967–5012.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. O. Foda and Y.-H. Quano, Polynomial identities of the Rogers-Ramanujan type, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 10 (1995), 2291–2315.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. O. Foda and Y.-H. Quano, Virasoro character identities from the Andrews- Bailey construction, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12 (1996), 1651–1675.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. P. J. Forrester and R. J. Baxter, Further exact solutions of the eight-vertex SOS model and generalizations of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities, J. Stat. Phys. 38 (1985), 435–472.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. J. Fulman, A probabilistic proof of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities preprint math.CO/0001078.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Fulman, Random matrix theory over finite fields: a survey, preprint math. GR/0003195.

    Google Scholar 

  34. G. Gasper and M. Rahman, Basic Hypergeometric Series, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Vol. 35, ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990 ).

    Google Scholar 

  35. I. Gessel and D. Stanton, Applications of q-Lagrange inversion to basic hypergeometric series, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 277 (1983), 173–201.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. V. G. Kac and D. H. Peterson, Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras, theta functions and modular forms, Adv. Math. 53 (1984), 125–264.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. V. G. Kac and M. Wakimoto, Modular invariant representations of infinite- dimensional Lie algebras and superalgebras, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 85 (1988), 4956–4960.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. C. Krattenthaler and O. Foda, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  39. G. M. Lilly and S. C. Milne, The C e Bailey transform and Bailey lemma, Constr. Approx. 9 (1993), 473–500.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. S. C. Milne, Balanced 3 2 summation theorems for U(n) basic hypergeometric series, Adv. Math. 131 (1997), 93–187.

    Google Scholar 

  41. S. C. Milne and G. M. Lilly, The A e and C e Bailey transform and lemma, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 26 (1992), 258–263.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. S. C. Milne and G. M. Lilly, Consequences of the A e and C e Bailey transform and Bailey lemma, Discrete Math. 139 (1995), 319–346.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. P. Paule, On identities of the Rogers-Ramanujan type, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 107 (1985), 255–284.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. P. Paule, A note on Bailey’s lemma, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 44 (1987), 164–167.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. P. Paule, The concept of Bailey chains, Publ. I.R.M.A. Strasbourg 358/S-18, (1988), 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  46. A. Riese, Contributions to symbolic q-hypergeometric summation, PhD thesis, RISC, J. Kepler University, Linz (1997), http: / / www. risc. uni-linz. ac. at /research / combinat / risc / publications.

    Google Scholar 

  47. L. J. Rogers, Second memoir on the expansion of certain infinite products, Proc. London Math. Soc. 25 (1894), 318–343.

    Google Scholar 

  48. L. J. Rogers, On two theorems of combinatory analysis and some allied identities, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) 16 (1917), 315–336.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. A. Schilling and S. O. Warnaar, A higher-level Bailey lemma, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 11 (1997), 189–195.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. A. Schilling and S. O. Warnaar, A higher level Bailey lemma: proof and application, The Ramanujan Journal 2 (1998), 327–349.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. A. Schilling and S. O. Warnaar, Conjugate Bailey pairs. From configuration sums and fractional-level string functions to Bailey’s lemma, preprint math.Q A/9906092.

    Google Scholar 

  52. U. B. Singh, A note on a transformation of Bailey, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 45 (1994), 111–116.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. L. J. Slater, A new proof of Rogers’s transformations of infinite series, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) 53 (1951), 460–475.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. L. J. Slater, Further identities of the Rogers-Ramanujan type, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) 54 (1952), 147–167.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. L. J. Slater, Wilfrid Norman Bailey, J. London Math. Soc. 37, (1962), 504–512.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. S. O. Warnaar, Fermionic solution of the Andrews-Baxter-Forrester model II. Proof of Melze’s polynomial identities, J. Stat. Phys. 84 (1996), 49–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. S. O. Warnaar, A note on the trinomial analogue of Bailey’s lemma, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 81 (1998), 114–118.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  58. S. O. Warnaar, Supernomial coefficients, Bailey’s lemma and Rogers-Ramanujan-type identities. A survey of results and open problems, Sem. Lothar. Combin. 42 (1999), Art. B42n, 22 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  59. S. O. Warnaar, The Bailey lemma and Kostka polynomials, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Warnaar, S.O. (2001). 50 Years of Bailey’s Lemma. In: Betten, A., Kohnert, A., Laue, R., Wassermann, A. (eds) Algebraic Combinatorics and Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59448-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59448-9_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41110-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59448-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics