Abstract
Sometimes revisions ought to start closer to the original basis for the paper, considered for a revision, than to start only with linguistic re-formulations and additions. Such a deeper analysis will be applied here, with a subsequent set of comments to the latest WMA proposal for a new version of the Declaration of Helsinki.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Riis, P. (2002). Revising the Helsinki Declaration: content of rules and their importance for science. In: Taupitz, J. (eds) Das Menschenrechtsübereinkommen zur Biomedizin des Europarates — taugliches Vorbild für eine weltweit geltende Regelung? / The Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine of the Council of Europe — a Suitable Model for World-Wide Regulation?. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Deutsches, Europäisches und Internationales Medizinrecht, Gesundheitsrecht und Bioethik der Universitäten Heidelberg und Mannheim, vol 7. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59424-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59424-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43449-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59424-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive