Skip to main content

Suture Materials and Techniques

  • Chapter
  • 586 Accesses

Abstract

A smooth healing with minimal scarring is an important goal in every wound management of the skin. Patients will judge the work of the surgeon plastically, that is on the looks of the scar; so the scar makes the reputation of the surgeon.The great variety of skin wounds calls for a differentiated approach to each one, which again is based on individual suture techniques and a multitude of available suture materials. In addition, the degree of a wound’s contamination as well as a number of systemic and local factors may influence the healing process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Thiede A, Dietz UA, Debus ES (2002) Klinischer Einsatz — Nahtmaterialien. Langenbecks Arch Chir (Kongressband DGC): 276–282

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson E, Sondenaa K, Hoher J (1989) A comparative study of polydioxanone (PDS) and polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in colonic anastomosis in rats. Int J Colorectal Dis 4: 251–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anscombe AR, Hira N, Hunt B (1970) The use of a new absorbable material (PGS) in general surgery. Br J Surg 57: 917–920

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blomstedt B, Jacobsson S-J (1970) Experiences with Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in General Surgery. Acta Chir Scand 143: 259–263

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chu CC (1982) The effect of pH on the in vitro degradation of polyglycolide lactide copolymer absorbable sutures. J Biomed Mater Res 16: 117–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chu CC, Moncrief G (1983) An in vitro evaluation of the stability of mechanical properties of surgical suture materials in various pH conditions. Ann Surg 198: 223–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Diener H (2001) Organspezifisches Resorptionsverhalten verschiedener moderner absorbierbarer Nahtmaterialien. Inauguraldissertation, Medizinische Fakultät der Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thiede A, Lünstedt B (1991) Chirurgisches Nahtmaterial — Vor- und Nachteile. In: Jahrbuch der Chirurgie. Biermann, S 243–255

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor B, Bayat A (2003) Basic plastic surgery techniques and principles: how to suture. Student BMJ 11: 182–184

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nockemann FP (1992) Die chirurgische Naht. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tera H, Åberg C (1976) Tensile strengths of twelve types of knot employed in surgery, using different suture materials. Acta Chir Scand 142: 1–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Trimbos JB (1984) Securitiy of various knots commonly used in surgical practice. Obstet Gynecol 64: 274–280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chu CC (1997) Classification and general characteristics of suture materials. In: Chu CC, von Fraunhofer JA, Greisler HP (eds) Wound closure biomaterials. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, pp 39–63

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thiede A, Stüwe W, Lünstedt B (1985) Vergleich von physikalischen Parametern und Handhabungseigenschaften kurzfristig und mittelfristig absorbierbarer Nahtmaterialien. Chirurg 56: 803–808

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ziegler UE, Dietz UA, Debus ES, Keller HP, Thiede A (2004) Nahtmaterialien und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie, (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Trimbos JB, Mouw R, Ranke G, Trimbos KB, Zwinderman K (2001) The Donati stitch revisited: favorable cosmetic results in a randomized clinical trial. J Surg Res 107: 131–134

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mohabir RC, Christensen B, Blair GK, Fitzpatrick DG (2003) Avoiding stitch abscesses in subcuticular skin closure: the L-stitch. Can J Surg 46: 223–224

    Google Scholar 

  18. Geiger D, Debus ES, Ziegler UE, Thiede A, Dietz UA (2003) Kapillarität von chirurgischem Nahtmaterial und fadenabhängige Bakterientranslokation: eine qualitative Untersuchung, (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Israelsson L (1999) Bias in clinical trials: the importance of suture technique. Eur J Surg 165: 3–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Böhm HJ, Jung W (2001) Hautverschlussmaßnahmen. Trauma Berufskrankh 3 [Suppl 1]: 528–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Weise K, Schäffer M (2000) Behandlungsstrategien bei Wundheilungsstörungen. Unfallchirurg 103: 100–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fisher GT, Fisher JB, Stark RB (1980) Origin of the use of subcuticular sutures. Ann Plast Surg 4: 144–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dietz, U.A., Debus, E.S., Hamelmann, W., Czeczko, N.G., Zlegler, U.E., Thiede, A. (2004). Suture Materials and Techniques. In: Téot, L., Banwell, P.E., Ziegler, U.E. (eds) Surgery in Wounds. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59307-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59307-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63929-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59307-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics