Skip to main content

Computer-Assisted Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Chapter
Book cover Minimally Invasive Total Joint Arthroplasty
  • 221 Accesses

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty has become one of the most successful procedures in orthopedic practice since its introduction in the early 1970s [1, 2]. Since its development, it has undergone many refinements, leading to good 10–15 year follow-up studies [3–5]. Correct component alignment and soft-tissue balancing have been cited as two of the most important components of successful knee-arthroplasty surgery [6, 7]. Alignment of the components is dependent on many factors including accurate pre-operative planning, normal bone morphology to which standardized instruments are applied and accurate placement of these instruments with the surgeons skill. Incorrect alignment caused by a variation of any of these factors can lead to abnormal wear [8, 9], premature mechanical loosening of the components [10, 11], and patellofemoral problems [12, 13].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Insall J, Ranawat CS, Scott WN, Walker P: Total condylar knee replacement: Preliminary report. Clin Orthop 120: 149–154, 1976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Insall J, Tria AJ, Scott WN: The total condylar knee prosthesis: The first five years. Clin Orthop 145: 68–77, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stern SH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilised prosthesis: results after follow-up of 9–12 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74-A: 980–986, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vince KG, Insall JN, Kelly MA.The total condylar prosthesis: 10 to 12 year results of a cemented knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 3: 17–25, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ranawat CS, Flynn Jr WF, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ: Long- term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty: A 15 year survivorship study. Clin Orthop 286: 96–102, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Freeman MA, Todd RC, Bamert P, Day WH:ICLH arthroplasty of the knee: 1968–1977. J Bone Joint Surg Br 60: 339–344, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Insall JN, Scott WN, Ranawat CS:The total condylar prosthesis. A report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61: 173–180, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Laskin RS:Total condylar knee replacement in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A ten-year follow up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:529–535,1990

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wasiliewski RC.Galante JO, Leighty R, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG: Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 229: 31–43, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA: Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73: 709–714, 1991

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tew M, Waugh W:Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67: 551–556, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Figgie HE, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS, Gordon NH: The influence of tibial patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68: 1035–1040, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Figgie HE 3rd, Goldberg VM, Figgie MP, Inglis AE, Kelly M, Sobel M:The effect of alignment of the implant on fractures of the patella after condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 71 A: 1031–1039, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chauhan S, Clark GW, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM: Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus conventional jig based technique. J Bone Joint Surg 86-B: 366–371, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sparmann M,Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A: Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. J Bone Joint Surg 85-B: 830–835, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krachow KA et al.: Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery - 3rd Annual Meeting of CAOS (International Proceedings), June 18–21, 2003. Stein kopff, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bonutti P, Mont M: Minimum 2 year follow up of MIS TKA. AAOS 2004

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tria AJ, Coon TM: Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty-early experience. Clin Orthop 416: 185–190, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Laskin RS: New techniques and concepts in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 416: 151–153, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chauhan, S.K. (2004). Computer-Assisted Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Hozack, W.J., et al. Minimally Invasive Total Joint Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59298-0_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59298-0_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63926-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59298-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics