Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment and Rehabilitation Concepts in Europe

  • Chapter
Book cover Minimally Invasive Total Joint Arthroplasty

  • 223 Accesses

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the leading causes of pain and disability in the Western World [1]. Over the last 40 years, total hip replacement (THR) has become a successful and widely acclaimed procedure to treat hip arthritis and to restore functional status and quality of life [2]. Due to extensive orthopedic research in improvements of prosthetic materials and design, fixation techniques, implant-tissue interaction and process-optimizing, THR became a highly effective technology with durable long-term results, while being very cost-effective [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The burden of musuloskeletal conditions at the of the new millennium. World Health Organ tech Rep Ser, 2003.919:i–x,1–218

    Google Scholar 

  2. Murray, D. Surgery and joint replacement for disease. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl], 1998. 281: 17–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Faulkner, A., et al. Effectiveness of hip Prostheses in primary total hip replacement: a critical review of evidence and an economic model. Health Technil Assses, 1998. 2 (6): 1–133

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burwell, H.N., D. Scott. A lateral intermuscular approach to the hip joint for replacement of the femoral head by a prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1954. 36: 104–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hardinge, K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1982. 64 (1): 17–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris, W.H. A new lateral approach to the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1967. 49 (5): 891–898

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iyer, K.M. A new posterior approach to the hip joint. Injury, 1981. 13 (1): 76–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Light, T.R., K.J. Keggi. Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 1980 152: 255–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith-Peterson, M.N. Approach to and exposure of the hip joint for mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1949. 31: 40–46

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sutherland, R., J.J. Rowe. Simplified surgical approach to the hip. Arch Surg, 1944. 48: 144

    Google Scholar 

  11. Watson-Jones, R. Fractures of the neck of the femur. Br J Surg, 1936. 23: 787–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger, R.A. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop, 2003 417: 232–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berry, D.J., et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Development, early results, and a critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003. 85-A(l1): 2235–2246

    Google Scholar 

  14. DiGioia, A.M., 3rd, et al. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty, 2003. 18 (2): 123–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldstein, W.M., et al. Minimal-incision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003. 85-A [Suppl 4]: 33–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kennon, R.E.,et al.Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003. 85-A [Suppl 4]: 39–48

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lester, D.K., M. Helm, Mini-Incision posterior approach for hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics and Traumatology, 2001. 4: 245–253

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sherry, E, et al. Minimal invasive surgery for hip replacement: a new technique using the NILNAV hip system. ANZ J Surg, 2003. 73 (3): 157–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Waldman, B.J. Advancements in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.Orthopedics, 2003. 26 [8 Suppl]: S833–836

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lester, D.K., L.S. Linn. Variation in hospital charges for total joint arthroplasty: an investigation of physician efficiency.Orthopedics, 2000. 23 (2): 137–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Waldman, BJ. Minimally invasive total hip replacement and perioperative management: early experience. J South Orthop Assoc, 2002. 11 (4): 213–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wenz, J.F., I. Gurkan, S.R. Jibodh. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics, 2002. 25(10): 1031 –1043

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Merx, H., et al. International variation in hip replacement rates. Ann Rheum Dis, 2003. 62 (3): 222–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Muller, R.T., N. Schurmann. Cost analysis of hip and knee prostheses as the basis for cost-benefit evaluation. Zentralbl Chir, 2001. 126 (1): 55–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Arnold, P., et al. Review of the results of the ARO multicenter study. Orthopäde, 1998. 27 (6): 324–332

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fitzpatrick, R., et al. Primary total hip replacement surgery: a systematic review of outcomes and modelling of cost-effectiveness associated with different prostheses. Health Technol Assess, 1998. 2 (20): 1–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Soderman, P., et al. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part II. Disease-specific follow-up and the Swedish National Total Hip Arthro-plasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand, 2001. 72 (2): 113–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Puolakka, T.J.,et al. The Finnish Arthroplasty Register: report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand, 2001.72(5): 433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Herberts, P., H. Malchau. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacements review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand, 2000. 71 (2): 111–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Metz, C.M., A.A. Freiberg. An international comparative study of total hip arthroplasty cost and practice patterns. J Arthroplasty, 1998. 13 (3): 296–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Callaghan, J.J., et al. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2000. 82 (4): 487–497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Harris, W.H. Options for primary femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. Cemented stems for all. Clin Orthop, 1997(344): 118–123

    Google Scholar 

  33. Head, W.C., D.J. Bauk, R.H. Emerson, Jr.Titanium as the material of choice for cementless femoral components in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 1995(311): 85–90

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hozack, W.J., et al. Primary cementless hip arthroplasty with a titanium plasma sprayed prosthesis. Clin Orthop, 1996(333): 217–225

    Google Scholar 

  35. Overgaard, S., et al. Hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite coatings for fixation of weight loaded implants. Clin Orthop, 1997(336): 286–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Delaunay, C., et al. Grit-blasted titanium femoral stem in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: a 5- to 10-year multicenter study. J Arthroplasty, 2001. 16 (1): 47–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim, Y.H., J.S. Kim, S.H. Cho, Primary total hip arthroplasty with a cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: 10- to 12-year results of prospective and consecutive series. J Arthroplasty, 1999. 14 (5): 538–548

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Berger, R.A., et al. Primary cementless acetabular reconstruction in patients younger than 50 years old. 7- to 11-year results. Clin Orthop, 1997(344): 216–226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cautilli, G.P, et al. A prospective review of 303 cementless universal cups with emphasis on wear as the cause of failure. Semin Arthroplasty, 1994. 5 (1): 25–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Dunkley, A.B., et al. Cementless acetabular replacement in the young. A 5- to 10-year prospective study. Clin Orthop, 2000(376): 149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Brodner, W,. B. Raffelsberger. Hüft-Total-Endoprothetik in Österreich. Eine bundesweite Umfrage mittels Fragebogen. Orthopäde, 2004. 33 (4): 462–471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Havelin, L.I., et al.The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand, 2000. 71 (4): 337–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. McNamara, B.P., et al. Relationship between bone-prosthesis bonding and load transfer in total hip reconstruction. J Biomech, 1997. 30 (6): 621–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Mont, M.A., D.S. Hungerford. Proxlmally coated Ingrowth prostheses. A review. Clin Orthop, 1997(344): 139–149

    Google Scholar 

  45. Daniel, J., P.B. Pynsent, DJ. McMlnn. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2004. 86 (2): 177–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Brindley, G.W., R. Adams. Cementless revision of total hip arthroplasty using proximal porous-coated femoral implants. J South Orthop Assoc, 1998. 7 (4): 246–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Chareancholvanich, K. et al. Cementless acetabular revision for aseptic failure of cemented hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 1999. 361: 140–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Engh, C.A., WJ. Culpepper, and, E. Kassapidis. Revision of loose cementless femoral prostheses to larger porous coated components. Clin Orthop, 1998. 347: 168–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mikhail, W.E., et al. Complex cemented revision using polished stem and morselized allograft. Minimum 5-years’follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1999. 119 (5–6): 288–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Dearborn, J.T., W.H. Harris. Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty, 2000. 15 (1): 8–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Garcia-Cimbrelo, E. Porous-coated cementless acetabular cups in revision surgery: a 6- to 11-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty, 1999. 14 (4): 397–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Burssens, P., et al. Acetabular bone stock reconstruction with frozen femoral head allografts and the use of a cementless screw cup in total hip revision surgery. A 5 years’ clinical, radiologic and scintigraphic follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg, 1989. 55 (1): 38–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Leopold, S.S., JJ. Jacobs, A.G. Rosenberg. Cancellous allograft in revision total hip arthroplasty. A clinical review. Clin Orthop, 2000 (371): 86–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Dai, X., et al. Serial measurement of polyethylene wear of well-fixed cementless metal- backed acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: an over 10 year follow-up study. Artif Organs, 2000. 24 (9): 746–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Elfick, A.P., S.L. Smith, A. Unsworth,Variation in the wear rate during the life of a total hip arthroplasty: a simulator and retrieval study. J Arthroplasty, 2000.15(7): 901 –908

    Google Scholar 

  56. Maloney, W.J., et al. Fixation, polyethylene wear, and pelvic osteolysis in primary total hip replacement. Clin Orthop, 1999 (369): 157–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Han, C.D., W.S. Choe, J.H. Yoo. Effect of polyethylene wear on osteolysis in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: minimal 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty, 1999. 14 (6): 714–723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Bitzer, E.M., H. Doming, F.W. Schwartz. Effects of rehabilitation after hip replacement surgery on postoperative complaints regarding the disease and limitation of function. Rehabilitation (Stuttg), 2001. 40 (1): 43–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Roos, E.M. Effectiveness and practice variation of rehabilitation after joint replacement. Curr Opin Rheumatol, 2003. 15 (2): 160–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. K. E. Dreinhöfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Puhl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Flören
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Jefferson Medical School, Rothman Institute Orthopedics, 925 Chestnut Street, 19107, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    William J. Hozack M.D. (Professor of Orthopedic Surgery) (Professor of Orthopedic Surgery)

  2. Department for Orthopaedics, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria

    Martin Krismer M.D. (Full Professor), Michael Nogler M.D., M.A., M.A.S., M.Sc. (Associate Professor) & Franz Rachbauer M.D., M.A.S., M.Sc. (Associate Professor) (Full Professor),  (Associate Professor) &  (Associate Professor)

  3. Bonutti Clinic, 1303 West Evergreen Avenue, 62401, Effingham, Illinois, USA

    Peter M. Bonutti MD, FACS (Associate Clinical Professor) (Associate Clinical Professor)

  4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas, USA

    Peter M. Bonutti MD, FACS (Associate Clinical Professor) (Associate Clinical Professor)

  5. Information Technology Division, e-Cleveland Clinic The Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A-41, 44195, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

    Jonathan L. Schaffer M.D., MBA (Managing Director) (Managing Director)

  6. Brisbane Orthopaedic Specialist Services, Holy Spirit Hospital, Level 7, Suite 1, Wickham Terrace, 4000, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    William J. Donnelly Dr. (Orthopedic Surgeon) (Orthopedic Surgeon)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dreinhöfer, K.E., Puhl, W., Flören, M. (2004). Treatment and Rehabilitation Concepts in Europe. In: Hozack, W.J., et al. Minimally Invasive Total Joint Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59298-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59298-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63926-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59298-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation