Skip to main content

Lateral Approach to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimal Soft Tissue Invasion

  • Chapter
Minimally Invasive Total Joint Arthroplasty

Abstract

Utilizing standard approaches to total knee replacements have led to excellent short-term and long-term results with survival rates over 95% at 10 years and greater in multiple studies [2, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, 16]. However, in the short term, these procedures lead to tremendous amount of morbidity with rehabilitative efforts that may take 3 months or more. There is a tremendous amount of pain associated with this procedure and patients will often need 1–2 h of physical therapy per day for the first 6 weeks after these procedures to lead to optimal results. In addition, some patients will need further operative procedures, i.e. manipulations, to obtain optimal results. Furthermore, the functional outcomes of patients with these procedures may not be as optimal as what has been reported in the literature. In a number of papers looking at patient-related outcomes, it appears that between 20 and 40% of patients are not completely satisfied with their total knee replacement [3, 4, 18]. The total knee replacement limits various functional activities. Multiple studies have described a discrepancy between how the surgeons perceive total knee replacement outcomes and how patients believe they have done.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bonutti PM, Neal, DJ, Kester MA. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty using the suspended leg technique. Orthopedics 2003; 26: 899–903

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buechel FF Sr. Long-term follow-up after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 2002; 404: 40–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 740–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dickstein R, Heffes Y, Shabtai El, Markowitz E. Total knee arthroplasty in the elderly: patients– self-appraisal 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Gerontology 1998; 44: 204–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1997; 345: 79–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanssen AD, Rand JA. A comparison of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the kinematic stabilizer prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70: 491–499

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iorio R, Healy WL. Unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 1351–1364

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keating EM, Meding JB, Faris PM, Ritter MA. Long-term follow-up of nonmodular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop 2002; 404: 34–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kolisek F, Bonutti P, Hozack W, Purtill J, Sharkey P, Zelicof S. A prospective, randomized comparison of total knee arthroplasties performed by the MIS technique compared to standard technique, (unpublished data)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mont MA, Ragland P. Functional results of patients with total knee replacements with excellent Knee Society Scores (unpublished data)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mont MA, Stuchin SA, Paley D, Sharkey PF, Parvisi J,Tria AJ Jr, Bonutti PM, Etienne G. Different surgical options for monocompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee: high tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: indications, techniques, results, and controversies. Instr Course Lect 2004; 53: 265–283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rand JA, llstrup DM. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty: Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 397–409

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Repicci JA. Mini-invasive knee unicompartmental arthroplasty: bone-sparing technique. Surg Technol Int 2003; 11: 280–284

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scott WN, Rubinstein M, Scuderi G. Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-substituting prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70: 1163–1173

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sculco TP. Orthopaedic crossfire - can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? In opposition. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 [Suppl 1]: 56–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stern SH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilized prosthesis: Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 980–986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stryker-Howmedica-OsteonicsTechnical Monograph on MISTKA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Trousdale RT, McGrory BJ, Berry DJ, Becker MW, Harmsen WS. Patients’ concerns prior to undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74: 978–982

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mont, M.A. et al. (2004). Lateral Approach to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimal Soft Tissue Invasion. In: Hozack, W.J., et al. Minimally Invasive Total Joint Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59298-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59298-0_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63926-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59298-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics