Abstract
Utilizing standard approaches to total knee replacements have led to excellent short-term and long-term results with survival rates over 95% at 10 years and greater in multiple studies [2, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, 16]. However, in the short term, these procedures lead to tremendous amount of morbidity with rehabilitative efforts that may take 3 months or more. There is a tremendous amount of pain associated with this procedure and patients will often need 1–2 h of physical therapy per day for the first 6 weeks after these procedures to lead to optimal results. In addition, some patients will need further operative procedures, i.e. manipulations, to obtain optimal results. Furthermore, the functional outcomes of patients with these procedures may not be as optimal as what has been reported in the literature. In a number of papers looking at patient-related outcomes, it appears that between 20 and 40% of patients are not completely satisfied with their total knee replacement [3, 4, 18]. The total knee replacement limits various functional activities. Multiple studies have described a discrepancy between how the surgeons perceive total knee replacement outcomes and how patients believe they have done.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bonutti PM, Neal, DJ, Kester MA. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty using the suspended leg technique. Orthopedics 2003; 26: 899–903
Buechel FF Sr. Long-term follow-up after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 2002; 404: 40–50
Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 740–747
Dickstein R, Heffes Y, Shabtai El, Markowitz E. Total knee arthroplasty in the elderly: patients– self-appraisal 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Gerontology 1998; 44: 204–210
Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1997; 345: 79–86
Hanssen AD, Rand JA. A comparison of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the kinematic stabilizer prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70: 491–499
Iorio R, Healy WL. Unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 1351–1364
Keating EM, Meding JB, Faris PM, Ritter MA. Long-term follow-up of nonmodular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop 2002; 404: 34–39
Kolisek F, Bonutti P, Hozack W, Purtill J, Sharkey P, Zelicof S. A prospective, randomized comparison of total knee arthroplasties performed by the MIS technique compared to standard technique, (unpublished data)
Mont MA, Ragland P. Functional results of patients with total knee replacements with excellent Knee Society Scores (unpublished data)
Mont MA, Stuchin SA, Paley D, Sharkey PF, Parvisi J,Tria AJ Jr, Bonutti PM, Etienne G. Different surgical options for monocompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee: high tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: indications, techniques, results, and controversies. Instr Course Lect 2004; 53: 265–283
Rand JA, llstrup DM. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty: Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 397–409
Repicci JA. Mini-invasive knee unicompartmental arthroplasty: bone-sparing technique. Surg Technol Int 2003; 11: 280–284
Scott WN, Rubinstein M, Scuderi G. Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-substituting prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70: 1163–1173
Sculco TP. Orthopaedic crossfire - can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? In opposition. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 [Suppl 1]: 56–58
Stern SH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilized prosthesis: Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 980–986
Stryker-Howmedica-OsteonicsTechnical Monograph on MISTKA
Trousdale RT, McGrory BJ, Berry DJ, Becker MW, Harmsen WS. Patients’ concerns prior to undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74: 978–982
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mont, M.A. et al. (2004). Lateral Approach to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimal Soft Tissue Invasion. In: Hozack, W.J., et al. Minimally Invasive Total Joint Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59298-0_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59298-0_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63926-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59298-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive