Abstract
Profitability studies for investment projects may use different methods to account for the manner in which the project is financed. These methods include the After Tax Weighted Average Cost of Capital (ATWACC, overall return), the equity residual method, the ARDITTI method (Before Tax Weighted Average Cost of Capital) and the Adjusted Present Value method. The discount rates and determination of cash flow differ for each method. For example, the ATWACC calculations, which are the most commonly used, are based on operating cash flows that exclude debt cash flows. Return on equity calculations are based on equity cash flows that include cash flows associated with the external financing, whereas the ARDITTI method (shadow interest) involves tax credits related to the deductibility of interest payments without reporting the credits from loans nor the corresponding principal repayments.
The method described in this paper involves cash flows that, in addition to operating cash flows, include the cash flows related to the payment of interest on loans and their incidence on tax. However it does not take into consideration loan cash inflows nor loan capital repayments.
The purpose of this paper is to compare this method with previous ones in order to determine the conditions required for its validation. An attempt is made to identify the possible fields of application.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arditti, F.D., The weighted average cost of capital; some question in its definition, interpretation and use, Journal of Finance, 28, n° 4, September 1973.
Babusiaux, D., Décision d’investissement et calcul économique dans l’entreprise, Technip-Economica, 1990
Babusiaux, D., Jaylet, J., “Calculs de rentabilité et mode de financement des investissements, ver s une nouvelle méthode ?”, Cahiers du CEG, n° 24, 1996, Investment Project Analysis and Financing Mix. A New Method ?.
Boudreaux, K.J., Long, H.W., The weighted average cost of capital as a cutoff rate: a further analysis, Financial Management, 8 n° 2, Summer 1979.
Breadley, R.A., Myers, S.C., Principle of corporate finance. MGraw Hill, New York, 1981.
Chambers, D.R., Harris, R.S., Pringle, J.J., Treatment of financing mix in analyzing investment opportunities, Financial Management, 8 n° 2, Summer 1979.
Guzman, G., Yafil, S., Étude d’une nouvelle méthode de calcul de rentabilité d’investissement, rapport interne IFP-ENSPM-CEG, septembre 1992.
Levy, H., Sarnat, M., Portfolio and investments selection: Theory and practice, Prentice Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, 1984.
Linke, C.M., Kim, M.K., More on the weighted average cost of capital: a comment and analysis, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 9, n° 4, December 1974.
Myers, S.C., Interactions of corporate financing and investment decisions. Implications for capital budgeting, Journal of Finance, 29, n° 1, March 1974.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Babusiaux, D., Jaylet, J. (1997). Investment Project Analysis and Financing Mix: A New Method in Sight?. In: Zopounidis, C. (eds) New Operational Approaches for Financial Modelling. Contributions to Management Science. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59270-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59270-6_16
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1043-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59270-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive