Skip to main content

A Method for Searching Rationality in Pairwise Choices

  • Conference paper
Multiple Criteria Decision Making

Abstract

In this paper an operational method is presented for searching rationality into paired comparisons of the alternatives. We base our method on the decomposition of a binary relation in terms of families of quasi orders. With the “mixture of maximal quasi orders”, as the main concept, we attempt to use decision maker’s inconsistencies as a kind of information for modelling his preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aumann, R.: Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica. 30 (1962) 445–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fishburn, P.C.: Utility theory for Decision Making, Wiley. New York. 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fishburn, P.C.: Nontransitive measurable utility. J. Math. Psychol. 26 (1982) 31–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gonzélez Pachön, J.: ‘The doubt attitude in a multicriteria decision making problem’ (1994) Presented at the XI International Conference on MCDM, Coimbra.

    Google Scholar 

  5. MacCrimmon, K.R. and S. Larsson,: “Utility theory: axioms versus paradoxes”. In Allais, M. and O. Hagen (eds). Reidel,1979, pp. 333–409.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ponsard, C.: Some dissenting views on the transitivity of individual preference. Annals of Operation Research. 23 (1990) 278–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ríos, S., S. Ríos-Insua, D. Ríos Insua, J. González Pachön: “Experiments in robust decision making”. In: S. Ríos (ed): Decision Theory and Decision Analysis: Trends and Challenges, Kluwer A.P., Amsterdam (1994), pp. 233–242.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ríos Insua, D.: Sensitivity Analysis in Multiobjective Decision Making. LNEMS 347, Springer, Berlin etc. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roberts, F.: Measurement Theory. Addison Wesley, Massachusetts. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roubens, M. and Ph. Vincke: Preference Modelling. LNEMS 250, Springer, Berlin etc. 1985.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Acker, P.: Transitivity revisited. Annals of Operation Research. 23 (1990) 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

González-Pachón, J., Ríos-Insua, S. (1997). A Method for Searching Rationality in Pairwise Choices. In: Fandel, G., Gal, T. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 448. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59132-7_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59132-7_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62097-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59132-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics