Skip to main content

Outranking-Driven Search Over a Nondominated Set

  • Conference paper
  • 1206 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 448))

Abstract

We consider the interactive exploration of implicitly or explicitly given large sets of alternatives. Upon review of classical interactive procedures, which usually assume a utility function preference model, we are distinguishing three typical operations used in various interactive procedures: contraction of the explored set, exploration of some neighbourhood of a current alternative, and reduction of a sample of the explored set. After pointing out some weak points of the traditional procedures, we describe three interactive procedures performing the three operations, respectively, using an outranking relation preference model. Due to proposed ways of building and exploiting the outranking relation, the weak points of traditional procedures can be overcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Debreu G. (1959), Theory of Value. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferhat A., Słowiński R., M’Silti M. (1994), Interactive method in MLP founded on the contraction of a non-dominated points set to the kernel of an outranking relation. Proc. CORS’94, Optimization Days, Montreal, Canada, June 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner L.R. and Steuer R.E. (1994), Unified interactive multiple objective programming. Eur. J. Opl Res., 74, 391–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang C.-L., Paidy S.R., Yoon K. and Masud A.S.M. (1980), Mathematical programming with multiple objectives: A tutorial. Comput. Oper. Res., 7, 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaszkiewicz A. and Słowiński R. (1992), Cone Contraction Method with Visual.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interaction for Multiple-Objective Non-Linear Programmes. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 1, 29-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaszkiewicz A. and Słowiński R. (1994), The Light Beam Search over a Non-Dominated Surface of a Multiple-Objective Programming Problem. In: G.H. Tzeng, H.F. Wang, V.P. Wen, P.L. Yu (ed.). Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Expand and Enrich the Domains of Thinking and Application, Springer Verlag, 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney R.L. and Raiffa H. (1976), Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce D. (1956), Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica, 24, 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal R.E. (1985), Principles of multiobjective optimization. Decision Sciences, 16, 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B. (1968), Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode Electre). Revue Francaise d’Informatique et de Recherche Opérationnelle, 8, 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy B. (1985), Méthodologie Multicritère d’Aide à la Décision, Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy B. and Bouyssou D. (1993), Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas. Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin W.S. and Ravindran A. (1991), Interactive multiple objective optimization: survey I — continuous case, Comput. Oper. Res., 18, 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Słowiński R. (1983), Preference modelling in multi-criteria decision problems, (in Polish). Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Slqskiej, ser. Automatyka, 67, 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Słowiński R. (1984), Review of multi-objective mathematical programming, (in Polish). Part I. Przegląd Statystyczny, XXXI, 47–63; Part II. Przegląd Statystyczny, XXXI, 303-317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Słowiński R. and Warczyński J. (1984), Application of the ellipsoid method in an interactive procedure for multicriteria linear programming. Ops. Res., 28, 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderpooten D. (1990a), The construction of prescription in outranking methods. In: Banae Costa C.A. (Ed.) Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderpooten D. (1990b), Multiobjective programming: basic concepts and approaches. In: Słowiński R. and Teghem J. (Eds.) Stochastic versus fuzzy approaches to multiobjective mathematical programming under uncertainty, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincke P. (1992), Multicriteria Decision-Aid. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jaszkiewicz, A., Słowiński, R. (1997). Outranking-Driven Search Over a Nondominated Set. In: Fandel, G., Gal, T. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 448. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59132-7_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59132-7_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62097-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59132-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics