Abstract
It is widely appreciated that American institutional economics (of the now “old” type) bears a family resemblance to the German, and even the English, historical schools. They share emphases on a broad conception of the economic system, an empirical rather than strictly deductive apriorist approach to knowledge, the importance of institutions, the conduct of case studies, and a deep sense of the historicity of the economic system and of economics as discipline. It is also widely appreciated that, although one can make strong exclusivist cases for rationalism and for empiricism, and for pure deduction and for pure induction, in practice these approaches to knowledge are not mutually exclusive; they are always used in some combination. Facts are always theory-laden and theory is always tied to some perception of facts/phenomena. All this applies to historicism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Commons, John R.: Legal Foundations of Capitalism, New York (Macmillan) 1924.
Samuels, Warren J.: “The Self-Referentiability of Thorstein Veblen’s Theory of the Preconceptions of Economic Science”, Journal of Economic Issues, 24 (September 1990), pp. 695–718.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Biddle, J., Samuels, W.J. (1997). The Historicism of John R. Commons’s Legal Foundations of Capitalism . In: Koslowski, P. (eds) Methodology of the Social Sciences, Ethics, and Economics in the Newer Historical School. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59095-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59095-5_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63849-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59095-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive