Skip to main content

Two-Mode Overlapping Clustering With Applications to Simultaneous Benefit Segmentation and Market Structuring

  • Conference paper
Classification and Knowledge Organization

Summary

A new two-mode overlapping clustering procedure is presented. This procedure includes solution possibilities for two-mode (non-)overlapping additive clustering as well as (non-)overlapping clusterwise regression with conjoint experiments and can be used for simultaneous benefit segmentation and market structuring. Applications of various cases of the new procedure to conjoint data are used for comparisons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AKAIKE, H. (1977): On Entropy Maximization Principle. In P. R. Krishnaiah (ed.): Applications of Statistics. North Holland, Amsterdam, 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARABIE, P. and CARROLL, J. D. (1980): MAPCLUS: A Mathematical Programming Approach to Fitting the ADCLUS Model. Psychometrika, 45, 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARABIE, P.; CARROLL, J. D.; DESARBO, W. S. and WIND, J. (1981): Overlapping Clustering: A New Method for Product Positioning. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 310–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BAIER, D. and GAUL, W. (1995): Classification and Representation Using Conjoint Data. In: W. GAUL, M. SCHADER (eds.): From Data to Knowledge. Springer, Berlin, 298–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • BAIER, D. and GAUL, W. (1996): Analyzing Paired Comparisons Data Using Probabilistic Ideal Point and Vector Models. In: H.-H. BOCK, W. POLASEK (eds.): Data Analysis and Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, 163–174.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • BAUER, H. H. (1989): Marktabgrenzung. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOTH, M. and GAUL, W. (1987): Ein Vergleich zweimodaler Clusteranalyseverfahren. Methods of Operations Research, 57, 593–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOZDOGAN, H. (1987): Model Selection and Akaike’s Information Criterion: The General Theory and Its Analytical Extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CARROLL, j. D. and ARABIE, P. (1983): An Individual Differences Generalization of the ADCLUS Model and the MAPCLUS Algorithm. Psychometrika, 48, 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CHATURVEDI, A and CARROLL, J. D. (1994): An Alternating Combinatorial Optimization Approach to Fitting the INDCLUS and Generalized INDCLUS Models. Journal of Classification, 11, 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CHATURVEDI, A.; CARROLL, J. D. and GREEN, P. E. (1994): A Feature Based Approach to Market Segmentation via Overlapping k-Centroids Clustering. Discussion Paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAY, G.S., SHOCKER, A.D., and SRIVASTAVA, R.K. (1979): Customer-Oriented Approaches to Identifying Product-Markets. Journal of Marketing, 43, 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DESARBO, W. S. (1982): GENNCLUS: New Models for General Nonhierarchical Clustering Analysis. Psychometrika, 47, 449–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GAUL, W. and SCHADER, M. (1994): Pyramidal Classification Based on Incomplete Dissimilarity Data. Journal of Classification, 11, 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GAUL, W and SCHADER, M. (1996): A New Algorithm for Two-Mode Clustering. In: H.-H. BOCK, W. POLASEK (eds.): Data Analysis and Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • HRUSCHKA, H. (1986): Market Definition and Segmentation Using Fuzzy Clustering Methods. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 3, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OPITZ, O. and BAUSCH, T. (1986): Nichtdisjunkte Klassifikation mit qualitativen Daten. Studien zur Klassifikation, 17, 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHEPARD, R. K. and ARABIE, P. (1979): Additive Clustering Representation of Similarities as Combinations of Discrete Overlapping Properties. Psychological Review, 86, 87–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SRIVASTAVA, R. K. and ALPERT, M. I., and SHOCKER, A.D. (1984): A Customer-Oriented Approach for Determining Market Structures. Journal of Marketing, 48, 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEDEL, M. and STEENKAMP, J. B. (1991): A Clusterwise Regression Method for Simultaneous Fuzzy Market Structuring and Benefit Segmentation, Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baier, D., Gaul, W., Schader, M. (1997). Two-Mode Overlapping Clustering With Applications to Simultaneous Benefit Segmentation and Market Structuring. In: Klar, R., Opitz, O. (eds) Classification and Knowledge Organization. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59051-1_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59051-1_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62981-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59051-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics