Skip to main content

The interplay between d-wave superconductivity and antiferromagnetic fluctuations: a quantum Monte Carlo study

  • Conference paper
High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering ’98
  • 273 Accesses

Abstract

We consider the repulsive Hubbard model on a square lattice with an additional term, W, which depends upon the square of a single-particle nearest-neighbor hopping. At half-band filling, constant W, we show that enhancing U/t drives the system from a d-wave superconductor to an antiferromagnetic Mott insulator. At zero temperature in the superconducting phase, spin-spin correlations follow a powerlaw: e-ir.Q|r|. Here Q = (π,π) and α is in the range 1 < α < 2 and depends upon the coupling constants W and U. This results is reached on the basis of large scale quantum Monte-Carlo simulations on lattices up to 24 × 24, and is shown to be independent on the choice of the boundary conditions. We define a pairing (magnetic) scale by the temperature below which short range d-wave pairing correlations (antiferromagnetic fluctuations) start growing. With finite temperature quantum Monte Carlo simulations, we demonstrate that both scales are identical over a large energy range. Those results show the extreme compatibility and close interplay of antiferromagnetic fluctuations and d-wave superconductivity.

The understanding of the interplay between d-wave superconductivity and antiferromagnetism is a central issue for the understanding of the phase diagram of High-T c superconductors [1]. The aim of this work is to further study a model which shows a quantum transition between a d-wave superconductor and an antiferromagnetic Mott insulator. It thus enables us to address the above question. The model we consider, has been introduced in Ref. [2]. It is defined by:

$$ H = - \frac{t}{2}\sum\limits_i {{K_i}} - W\sum\limits_i {K_i^2} + U\sum\limits_i {\left( {{n_{i, \uparrow }} - \frac{1}{2}} \right)} \left( {{n_{i, \downarrow }} - \frac{1}{2}} \right) $$
(1)

with the hopping kinetic energy

$${{K}_{i}} = \sum\limits_{{\sigma ,\delta }} {(c_{{i,\sigma }}^{\dag }{{c}_{{i + \delta ,\sigma }}} + c_{{i + \delta ,\sigma }}^{\dag }{{c}_{{i,\sigma }}})}$$
(2)

Here, W ≥ 0, δ = ±a x , ±a y , and n i = c i,σ c i,σ where c i,σ (c i,σ ) creates (annihilates) an electron on site i with z-component of spin σ. We impose twisted boundary conditions:

$$ {c_{i + L{a_x},\sigma }} = \exp \left( {2\pi i\Phi /{\Phi _0}} \right){c_{i,\sigma }},{c_{i + L{a_y},\sigma }} = {c_{i,\sigma }} $$
(3)

We have equally shown that the energy scales at which d-wave pairing and antiferromagnetic fluctuations occur are identical. The further understanding of spin and charge dynamics, as well as the doping of the model remains for further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.G. Bednorz and K.A. Müller, Z. Phys. B 64, 189, (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. F.F. Assaad, M. Imada and D.J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4592, (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Phys. Rev. B, Phys. Rev. B 56, 15001, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F.F. Assaad and M. Imada Phys. Rev. B. 58, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Sugiyama and S.E. Koonin, Annals of Phys.168 (1986) 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Sorella, S. Baroni, R. Car, And M. Parrinello, Europhys. Lett. 8 (1989) 663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Sorella, E. Tosatti, S. Baroni, R. Car, and M. Parinello, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B1 (1989) 993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 31, 4403, (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S.R. White et al. Phys. Rev. B40, 506, (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 133A, 171, (1964).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. N. Byers and C.N. Yang, Phys Rev. Let.7, 46, (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C.N. Yang, Reviews of Mod. Phys. 34, 694 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F.F. Assaad, W. Hanke and D.J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1915 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Phys. Rev. B 49, 4327 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Flux quantization, measures directly the superfluid density which does not require the knowledge of the symmetry of pairing correlations, the form factor of the Cooper pair, or the nature of the quasiparticle which constitute the Cooper pair. We note however that we not yet established firmly the occurrence of a flux minima at Ф/Ф 0 = 0 [2].

    Google Scholar 

  16. At U/t = 2 and U/t = 1, one may show numerically that the vertex contribution to the d-wave pairing susceptibility grows quicker than the vertex contribution to the staggered spin susceptibility as a function of system size [15].

    Google Scholar 

  17. We note that obtaining the exponent a from the size scaling of S(Q) requires larger lattice sizes than the ones considered here. Short range spin-spin correlations included in S(Q)are still important for the considered lattice sizes.

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. F. Assaad et al. unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S.C. Zhang, Science, 275, 1089, (1997).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Assaad, F.F. (1999). The interplay between d-wave superconductivity and antiferromagnetic fluctuations: a quantum Monte Carlo study. In: Krause, E., Jäger, W. (eds) High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering ’98. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58600-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58600-2_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63661-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-58600-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics