Advertisement

Exploration of Peptide Free Energy Surfaces

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering book series (LNCSE, volume 4)

Abstract

The Conformational Free Energy Thermodynamic Integration (CFTI) method, a new multidimensional approach for conformational free energy simulations, is presented. The method is applied to two problems of biochemical interest: exploration of the free energy surfaces of helical alanine (Ala) and α-methylalanine (Aib) homopeptides in vacuum and the cost of pre-organization of the opioid peptide Tyr-D-Pen-Gly-Phe-D-Pen (DPDPE) peptide for disulfide bond formation. In the CFTI approach a single molecular dynamics simulation with all ø and ψ dihedrals kept fixed yields the complete conformational free energy gradient for the studied peptides. For regular structures of model peptides (Ala)n and (Aib)n where n=6,8,10 and Aib is a-methylalanine in vacuum, free energy maps in the helical region of ø- ψ space are calculated, and used to roughly locate stable states. The locations of the free energy minima are further refined by the novel procedure of free energy optimization by steepest descent down the gradient, leading to structures in excellent agreement with experimental data. The stability of the minima with respect to deformations is studied by analysis of second derivatives of the free energy surface. Analysis of free energy components and molecular structures uncovers the molecular mechanism for the propensity of Aib peptides for the 310-helix structure in the interplay between the quality and quantity of hydrogen bonds. For the linear form of the DPDPE peptide in solution, free energy differences are calculated between four conformers: Cyc, representing the structure adopted by the linear peptide prior to disulfide bond formation, β c and β E, two slightly different β-turns previously identified as representative, stable structures of the peptide, and Ext, an extended structure. The simulations indicate that β E is the most stable of the studied conformers of linear DPDPE in aqueous solution, with β c , Cyc and Ext having free energies higher by 2.3, 6.3, and 28.2 kcal/mol, respectively. The free energy differences of 4.0 kcal/mol between β c and Cyc, and 6.3 kcal/mol between β E and Cyc, reflect the cost of pre-organizing the linear peptide into a conformation conducive for disulfide bond formation. Such a conformational change is a pre-requisite for the chemical reaction of S-S bond formation to proceed.

Keywords

Free Energy Free Energy Surface Free Energy Minimum Internal Strain Disulfide Bond Formation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. P. Straatsma and J. A. McCammon. Computational alchemy. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 43: 407–435, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Kuczera. One-and multidimensional conformational free energy simulations. J. Comp. Chem., 17: 1726–1749, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T.P. Straatsma and J.A. McCammon. Multiconfiguration thermodynamic integration. J. Chem. Phys., 95: 1175–1188, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. E. Smith and B. M. Pettitt. Amino acid side-chain populations in aqueous and saline solution: Bis(penicillamine) enkephalin. Biopolymers, 32: 1623–1629, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. E. Smith and A. D. J. Haymet. Free energy, entropy and internal energy of hydrophobic interactions: computer simulations. J. Chem. Phys., 98: 6445–6454, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. M. Boczko and C. L. Brooks III. First principles calculation of the folding free energy of a three helix bundle protein. Science, 269: 393–396, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Mezei and D. L. Beveridge. Free energy simulations. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 482: 1–23, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Wang and K. Kuczera. Exploration of conformational free energy surface of helical Alan and Aibn peptides. J. Phys. Chem. B, 101: 5205–5213, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Wang. Computational Approach to the Influence of the Bisulfide Bond on Peptide Properties. PhD thesis, University of Kansas, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Wang and K. Kuczera. Conformational free energy surface of the linear DPDPE peptide: Cost of pre-organization for disulfide bond formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc, submitted, 1997.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. I. Mosberg, R. Hurst, V. J. Hruby, K. Gee, H. I. Yamamura, J. J. Galligan, and T. F. Burks. Bis-penicillamine enkephalins possess highly improved specificity toward δ opioid receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 80: 5871–5874, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. A. Carter, G. Ciccotti, J. T. Hynes, and R. Kapral. Constrained reaction coordinate dynamics for the simulation of rare events. Chem. Phys. Lett, 156: 472–477, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. L. Brooks III, M. Karplus, and B. M. Petitt. Proteins: A Theoretical Perspective of Dynamics, Structure, and Thermodynamics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1988.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. Wang and K. Kuczera. Molecular dynamics simulations of cyclic and linear DPDPE: Influence of the disulfide bond on peptide flexibility. J. Phys. Chem., 100: 2555–2563, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Gao, K. Kuczera, B. Tidor, and M. Karplus. Hidden thermodynamics of mutant proteins: A molecular dynamics analysis. Science, 244: 1069–1072, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Kuczera, J. Gao, B. Tidor, and M. Karplus. Free energy of sickling: A simulation analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87: 8481–8485, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular BiologyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations