Abstract
To determine the number of modes in a one dimensional distribution, we compute for each m the Kolmogorov distance between the empirical distribution \({D_m} = {\text{in}}{{\text{f}}_{F \in {u_m}}}{\text{ su}}{{\text{p}}_x}\left| {{F_n}\left( x \right) - F\left( x \right)} \right|\) F n , and a distribution F ∈ U m ,the set of uniform mixtures with at most m modes. The m — 1 antimodes obtained in the best fitting m—modal distributions, collected for all m,form a hierarchical tree of intervals. To decide which of these empirical antimodes corresponds to an antimode in the true distribution, we define a test statistic based on a ‘shoulder interval’, a maximal interval of constant density that is neither a mode nor an antimode, in a best fitting m-modal uniform mixture. For each empirical antimode, there is a shoulder interval of minimum length including it, and the points in this shoulder interval are taken as a reference set for evaluating the antimode. The statistic is the maximum deviation of the empirical distribution from a monotone density fit in the shoulder interval, and the reference distribution for it is the maximum empirical excursion for a sample from the uniform with the same sample size as the number of points in the shoulder interval. We demonstrate that this reference distribution gives approximately valid significance tests for a range of population distributions, including some with several modes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
CHENG, M-Y. and HALL, P. (1999): Mode testing in difficult cases. Annals of Statistics, 27 1294–1315
BIRNBAUM, Z.W. (1952): Numerical Tabulation of the distribution of Kolmogorov’s statistic for finite sample size. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47 425–441
BOCK, H.H. (1996): Probability models and hypotheses testing in partitioning cluster analysis. In: Ph. Arabie, L. Hubert, G. De Soete (eds.) Clustering and classification. World Science Publishers, River Edge/NJ, 377–453.
HARTIGAN, J.A. and HARTIGAN, P.M. (1985): The dip test of unimodality Annals of Statistics, 13 70–84
HARTIGAN, J.A. (1987): Estimation of a convex density contour in two dimensions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82 267–270
IZENMAN, A.J. and SOMMER, C.J. (1988): Philatelic mixtures and multimodal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83 941–953
KENNEDY, D.P. (1976): The distribution of the Maximum Brownian Excursion. Journal of Applied Probability, 13 371–376.
KOMLOS, J., MAJOR, P. and TUSNADY, G. (1975): An approximation of partial sums of independent random variables, and the sample DF. I. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Gebiete, 32 111–131
MAMMEN, E., MARRON, J.S. and FISHER, N.I. (1992):. Some asymptotics for multimodality tests based on kernel density estimates. it Probability Theory and Related Fields, 91 115–132.
MINOTTE, M.C. and SCOTT, D.W. (1992): The mode tree: a tool for visualisation of nonparametric density features. Journal of Computational Graphics and Statistics, 2 51–68
MULLER, D.W. and SAWITZKI, G. (1987): Using excess mass estimates to investigate the modality of a distribution. Preprint no 938, Universitat Heidelberg, Sonderforschungsbereich 123 Stochastiche Mathematische Modelle.
MULLER, D.W. and SAWITZKI, G. (1991): Excess mass estimates and tests for multimodality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86 738–746
SILVERMAN, B.W. (1981): Using kernel density estimates to investigate multi-modality. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B., 43 97–99
Silverman, B.W.(1983): Some properties of a test for multimodality based on kernel density estimates. In: J.F.C.Kingman and G.E.H.Reuter(eds.) Probability, Statistics, and Analysis.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 248–259.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hartigan, J.A. (2000). Testing for Antimodes. In: Gaul, W., Opitz, O., Schader, M. (eds) Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58250-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58250-9_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67731-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-58250-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive