Skip to main content

Central and Renal Hemodynamic Effects of Diltiazem in Chronic Heart Failure

  • Conference paper
Heart Failure Mechanisms and Management
  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

There has been recent interest in attempting to use the arterial vasodilating activity of calcium channel blocking drugs to decrease left ventricular (LV) afterload in patients with severe heart failure (CHF). However, unlike other vasodilators used in the treatment of CHF, calcium channel blocking drugs possess intrinsic negative inotropic activity as well; clinical studies have shown that both verapamil [1] and nifedipine [2,3] may lead to marked clinical deterioration in patients with severe CHF. Diltiazem, the third presently available calcium channel blocking agent, has less intrinsic negative inotropic effect than verapamil and nifedipine [4,5] and has been shown in one study to be acutely beneficial in patients with severe CHF [6].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chew CY, Hecht HS, Collett JT, McAllister RG, Singh BN (1981) Influence of severity of ventricular dysfunction on hemodynamic responses to intravenously administered verapamil in ischemic heart disease. Am J Cardiol 47: 917–922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Elkayam U, Weber L, McKay CR, Rahimtoola SH (1985) Spectrum of acute hemodynamic effects of nifedipine in severe congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 56: 560–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks N, Cattell M, Pidgeon J, Balcon R (1980) Unpredictable response to nifedipine in severe cardiac failure. Br Med J 281: 1324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Henry PD(1980) Comparative pharmacology ofcalcium antagonists: nifedipinc. verapamil. and diltiazem. Am J Cardiol 46:1047–1058

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stone PH, Antman EM, Muller JE, Braunwald E (1980) Calcium channel blocking agents in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders. II. Hemodynamic effects and clinical applications. Ann Intern Med 93: 886–904

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Walsh RA, Porter CB, Starling MR, O’Rourke RA (1984) Beneficial hemodynamic effects of intravenous and oral diltiazem in severe congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 3: 1044–1050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Packer M, Lee WH, Medina N, Yushak M (1985) Comparative negative inotropic effects of nifedipine and diltiazem in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (abstract). Circulation 72: III - 275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elkayam U, Weber L, Torkan B, McKay CR, Rahimtoola SH (1984) Comparison of hemodynamic responses to nifedipine and nitroprusside in severe chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 53: 1321–1325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Elkayam U, Weber L, McKay CR, Rahimtoola SH (1984) Differences in hemodynamic response to vasodilation due to calcium channel antagonism with nifedipine and direct-acting agonism with hydralazine in chronic refractory congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 54: 126–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leithe ME, Margorien RD, Hermiller JB, Unverferth DV, Leier CV (1984) Relationship between central hemodynamics and regional blood flow in normal subjects and in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 69: 57–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cogan JJ, Humphreys MH, Carlson CJ, Rapaport E (1980) Renal effects of nitroprusside and hydralazine in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 61: 316–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Creager MA, Halperin JL, Bernard DB, Faxon DP, Melidossian CD, Gavras H, Ryan TJ (1981) Acute regional circulatory and renal hemodynamic effects of converting-enzyme inhibition in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 64: 483–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Elkayam U, Weber L, Campese VM, Massry SG, Rahimtoola SH (1984) Renal hemodynamic effects of vasodilation with nifedipine and hydralazine in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 4: 1261–1267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohn JN, Levine TB, Francis GS, Goldsmith S (1981) Neurohumoral control mechanisms in congestive heart failure. Am Heart J 102: 509–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohn JN, Levine TB, Olivari MT, Garberg V, Lura D, Francis GS, Simon AB, Rector T (1984) Plasma norepinephrine as a guide to prognosis in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 311: 819–823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kulick, D.L., Elkayam, U. (1991). Central and Renal Hemodynamic Effects of Diltiazem in Chronic Heart Failure. In: Lewis, B.S., Kimchi, A. (eds) Heart Failure Mechanisms and Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58231-8_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58231-8_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63509-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-58231-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics