Advertisement

Nuclide Yields of Light Fission Products for 241Am(2nth,f) at Different Kinetic Energies

  • P. Siegler
  • T. Schunk
  • M. Mutterer
  • W. Schwab
  • J. P. Theobald
  • U. Quade
  • H. Faust
Part of the Research Reports in Physics book series (RESREPORTS)

Abstract

The yield of light fission products from the reaction 241Am(2nth,f) were measured as function of mass A, atomic number Z, and kinetic energy E, using the recoil mass separator LOHENGRIN of the Institute Laue-Langevin at Grenoble. Mass distributions summed over ionic charge states were determined within the mass range 85 ≤ A ≤ 110 at seven kinetic energies between 86.9 and 117.0 MeV. For the same range of masses, nuclear charge distributions were measured for five energy values between 98.0 and 116.2 MeV. From the data, we have also evaluated the energy integrated nuclear charge and mass yields, as well as isotonic and isotopic yields and their odd-even effects.

Keywords

241Am(2nth,f) 242Am mass separator LOHENGRIN light fission products mass and energy distribution fractional independent yields odd-even effects of elements and isotones 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. Wolfsberg and G.P. Ford, Phys. Rev. C3, 1333 (1971).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B.L. Tracy, J.E. Pleva, H.G. Thode, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 35, 2639 (1973).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.N. Gudkov et al., Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 41, 365 (1985).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Moll et al., Kerntechnik 19, 374 (1977).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    U. Quade et al., Nucl. Phys. A487 1 (1988).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Djebara et al., Nucl. Phys. A496, 346 (1989).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Martinez et al., Nucl. Phys. A515, 433 (1990).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.P. Bocquet, R. Brissot, H.R. Faust, Nucl. Instr. Meth. in Phys. Res. A267, 466 (1988).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Schillebeecks, PHD-Thesis, Gent (1989).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Schmitt et al., Nucl. Phys. A430, 21 (1984).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B.D. Wilkins, E.P. Steinberg, R.R. Chaseman, Phys. Rev. C14, 1832 (1976).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B.L. Tracy et al., Phys. Rev. C5, 222 (1972)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Stumpf, U. Guttler, H.O. Denschlag, contribution to this conference.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Siegler
    • 1
  • T. Schunk
    • 2
  • M. Mutterer
    • 2
  • W. Schwab
    • 2
  • J. P. Theobald
    • 2
  • U. Quade
    • 3
  • H. Faust
    • 4
  1. 1.Institut für KernphysikTechnische Hochschule DarmstadtGermany
  2. 2.Sektion PhysikUniversität MünchenGermany
  3. 3.Institute Laue-LangevinGrenobleFrance
  4. 4.JRC-CBNMGeelBelgium

Personalised recommendations