Skip to main content

Subjective Uncertainty and the Structure of the Set of all Possible Events

  • Conference paper
Item Banking: Interactive Testing and Self-Assessment

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 112))

Abstract

Two approaches to the concept of uncertainty are presented here as complementary methods. The first approach studies the assessment of certainty or accuracy probability in knowledge questionnaires. The issue in this case is the structure of the questions and the knowledge, and the difficulty subjects experience when building an adequate representation of the different perspectives used to Widerstand the proposed choices. The results of several past and current studies are reported to illustrate the secondary nature of confidence ratings and the indicative role they can play. The second approach involves the analysis of how common expressions of uncertainty are coded. A rccent finding is used to demonstrate that the representation of uncertainty depends on the makcup of the reference universe. When the choices which constitute that universe are clearly distinguished and delineated, certainty and uncertainty are two distinct dimensions. The difference between certainty and uncertainty is not so obvious, however, when the context in which a choice becomes meaningful is not clearly defined. In conclusion, it is proposed that the concept of realism in confidence assessment be reconsidered and newly viewed as the relationship between a subjective rating scale showing uncertainty at one end and certainty at the other, and a representation of the problem context underlying each question.

Translation due to Vivian Waltz.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Evans, J. St. B. T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: causes and consequences. Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabre, J.-M. & Noizet, G. (1977). Jugement du vrai et du faux sur des énoncés affirmatifs et négatifs. In Psychologie expérimentale et comparé Hommagée à Paul Fraisse (pp. 411–426). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabre, J.-M. (1980). Jugement et certitude, Recherche sur l’évaluation des connaissances. Berne: Peter Lang, Collection Exploration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabre, J.-M. (1991). The expression of uncertainty: two contextual effects. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3, 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabre, J.-M. (1993), Contexte et jugement , de la psychophysique à la responsabilité, Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, P.J. (1959). The expression of certainty. American Journal of Psychology, 53, 614–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R.M. (1980). Judgment and choice, The psychology of decision. New-York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S. & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B. & Phillips, L.D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The State of art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases_ (pp. 306–334). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, A.G.R., Coulson, A.S. & Icke, S.E., (1990). Bias in meta-memory Performance and its implications for modeis of memory structure. In J.-P. Caverni, J.-M. Fabre & M. Gonzalez (eds), Cognitive Biases (pp. 511–519). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noizet, G. & Fabre, J.-M. (1975). Etude docimologique des questionnaires à choix multiple. Scientia Padagogica Experimentalis, 12, 38–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. (1983). Category ratings and the relational character of judgment. In H.-G. Geissler, H.F.J.M. Buffart, E.L.J. Lceuwenberg & V. Sarris (Eds.), Modern issues in perception (pp. 262–282). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. (1990). Response bias and contextual effects: when biased? In J.-P. Caverni, J.-M. Fabre & M. Gonzalez (eds), Cognitive Biases (pp. 208–219). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, J.E. (1974). Effects of decision importance on ability to generate warranted subjective uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 688–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fabre, JM. (1993). Subjective Uncertainty and the Structure of the Set of all Possible Events. In: Leclercq, D.A., Bruno, J.E. (eds) Item Banking: Interactive Testing and Self-Assessment. NATO ASI Series, vol 112. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58033-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58033-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63444-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-58033-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics