Advertisement

Situation Graphs as Tools for Ordering of Students’ Thinking and Understanding of Actual Existing Servo Mechanisms

  • Jorma Enkenberg
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 116)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss and evaluate an open-ended LEGO-LOGO prototype project designed to facilitate learning about the structure and function of actual existing servo mechanisms. The theory of cognitive apprenticeship was applied in the modeling of the seventh grade students’ learning and their teacher’s role. The project was divided into five consequent stages: open investigation of actual existing phenomena, the representation of different forms of actual existing servo mechanisms’ structures and functions, the construction of LEGO® models, programming the models with LOGO and writing and presenting reports. The situation graph was used as a tool for knowledge representation and reflection in several phases of the project. In this paper both the methodology and the results of the work done by students will be discussed and evaluated.

Keywords

Cognitive apprenticeship Control technology Constructivism Elementary education Evaluation Knowledge representation LOGO Longitudinal study Problem solving Pupil learning Pedagogical robotics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achtenhagen F. (1990) Development of problem solving skills in natural settings. In Carratero M., Pope M., Simons R. and Pozo J.(Eds.) Learning and Instruction. European Research in an International Context: Vol III. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson J.R. (1987) Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psychological Review, 94, 192–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bereiter C. (1990) Aspects of an educational learning theory. Review of Educational Research. 60(4), 603–624.Google Scholar
  4. Boy G. (1991) Intelligent assistant systems. Knowledge-based systems. Vol. 6. Cornwall: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown J.S., Collins A. and Duguid P. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.Google Scholar
  6. Carrager T.N., Carrager D.W. and Schlieman A.D. (1985) Mathematics in the streets and the schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins A., Brown J.S. and Newman S.E. (1989) Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In Resnick L. (Ed.) Knowing, learning and instruction. Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  8. De Corte E. (1990) Towards powerful learning environments for the acquisition of problem-solving skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Corte E. (1992) On the learning and teaching of problem-solving skills in mathematics and LOGO programming. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41(4), 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glaser R. (1987) Thoughts on expertise. In Schooler C., Schaic W. (Eds.) Cognitive Functioning and Social Structure over the Life Courses. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  11. Harel I. (1991) Children designers. Norwood NJ: AblexGoogle Scholar
  12. Larkin J., McDermott J., Simon D. and Simon H. (1980) Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Paliscar A.S., Brown A.L. (1984) Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Papert S. (1991) Situated constructionism. In Harel I., Papert S. (Eds.) Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  15. Resnick L. (1987) Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20.Google Scholar
  16. Resnick L., Klopfer L. (1989) Toward the thinking curriculum: An overview. In Resnick L., Klopfer L. (Eds.) Toward the Thinking Curriculum: Current Cognitive Research. 1989 ASCD Yearbook. ASCD.Google Scholar
  17. Rogoff B., Lave J. (1984) Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Scardamalia M., Bereiter C. (1985) Fostering the development of self regulation in children’s knowledge processing. In Chipman S., Segal J. and Glaser R. (Eds.) Thinking and Learning Skills. Vol 2. Research and Open Questions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Shaw L.G., Woodward J.B. (1990) Modeling expert knowledge. Knowledge Acquisition, 2, 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schoenfeld A.H. (1985) Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Schwartz S., Griffin T. (1986) Medical thinking: The psychology of medical judgement and decicion making. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Shuell T.J. (1990) Teaching and learning as problem solving. Theory into Practice, 29, 102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vygotsky L.S. (1978) Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorma Enkenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Subject Teacher and Study Adviser EducationUniversity of JoensuuJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations